Kelli Gruber1, Amr S Soliman1, Kendra Schmid2, Bryan Rettig3, June Ryan4,5, Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Nebraska. 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Public Health, Omaha, Nebraska. 3. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, Nebraska. 4. Nebraska Cancer Coalition, Omaha, Nebraska. 5. Nebraska Comprehensive Cancer Control Program, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Lincoln, Nebraska.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advances in medical technology are changing surgical standards for colon cancer treatment. The laparoscopic colectomy is equivalent to the standard open colectomy while providing additional benefits. It is currently unknown what factors influence utilization of laparoscopic surgery in rural areas and if treatment disparities exist. The objectives of this study were to examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with receiving laparoscopic colectomy and to examine the differences between rural and urban patients who received either procedure. METHODS: This study utilized a linked data set of Nebraska Cancer Registry and hospital discharge data on colon cancer patients diagnosed and treated in the entire state of Nebraska from 2008 to 2011 (N = 1,062). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of receiving the laparoscopic treatment. RESULTS: Rural colon cancer patients were 40% less likely to receive laparoscopic colectomy compared to urban patients. Independent predictors of receiving laparoscopic colectomy were younger age (<60), urban residence, ≥3 comorbidities, elective admission, smaller tumor size, and early stage at diagnosis. Additionally, rural patients varied demographically compared to urban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is becoming the new standard of treatment for colon cancer and important disparities exist for rural cancer patients in accessing the specialized treatment. As cancer treatment becomes more specialized, the importance of training and placement of general surgeons in rural communities must be a priority for health care planning and professional training institutions.
BACKGROUND: Advances in medical technology are changing surgical standards for colon cancer treatment. The laparoscopic colectomy is equivalent to the standard open colectomy while providing additional benefits. It is currently unknown what factors influence utilization of laparoscopic surgery in rural areas and if treatment disparities exist. The objectives of this study were to examine demographic and clinical characteristics associated with receiving laparoscopic colectomy and to examine the differences between rural and urban patients who received either procedure. METHODS: This study utilized a linked data set of Nebraska Cancer Registry and hospital discharge data on colon cancerpatients diagnosed and treated in the entire state of Nebraska from 2008 to 2011 (N = 1,062). Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of receiving the laparoscopic treatment. RESULTS:Rural colon cancerpatients were 40% less likely to receive laparoscopic colectomy compared to urban patients. Independent predictors of receiving laparoscopic colectomy were younger age (<60), urban residence, ≥3 comorbidities, elective admission, smaller tumor size, and early stage at diagnosis. Additionally, rural patients varied demographically compared to urban patients. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is becoming the new standard of treatment for colon cancer and important disparities exist for rural cancerpatients in accessing the specialized treatment. As cancer treatment becomes more specialized, the importance of training and placement of general surgeons in rural communities must be a priority for health care planning and professional training institutions.
Authors: Marco Braga; Nicolò Pecorelli; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Valerio Di Carlo Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2011-03-15
Authors: Celia N Robinson; G John Chen; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; Christy L Marshall; Daniel A Anaya; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-01-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Abraham Markin; Elizabeth B Habermann; Christopher J Chow; Yanrong Zhu; Selwyn M Vickers; Waddah B Al-Refaie Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Laura-Mae Baldwin; Yong Cai; Eric H Larson; Sharon A Dobie; George E Wright; David C Goodman; Barbara Matthews; L Gary Hart Journal: J Rural Health Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.333
Authors: Rittal Mehta; Kota Sahara; Katiuscha Merath; J Madison Hyer; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Anghela Z Paredes; Aslam Ejaz; Jordan M Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Allan Tsung; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Erik J DeAngelis; James A Zebley; Ikechukwu S Ileka; Sangrag Ganguli; Armon Panahi; Richard L Amdur; Khashayar Vaziri; Juliet Lee; Hope T Jackson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jordan Baker; Hope Krebill; Hanluen Kuo; Ronald C Chen; Jeffrey A Thompson; Matthew S Mayo; Dinesh Pal Mudaranthakam; Lynn Chollet-Hinton Journal: Health Equity Date: 2022-05-20
Authors: Caleb J Fan; Hung-Lun Chien; Matthew J Weiss; Jin He; Christopher L Wolfgang; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik; Martin A Makary Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-02-26 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mesnad Alyabsi; Mary Charlton; Jane Meza; K M Monirul Islam; Amr Soliman; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 3.302