Literature DB >> 24445673

The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Chun-Li Wang1, Gang Qu, Hong-Wei Xu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Published randomized controlled trial (RCT) reports of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for colorectal cancer were searched, and short- and long-term factors were extracted to perform meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 15 RCT reports (6,557 colorectal cancer patients) were included in this study. Blood loss of laparoscopic surgery was less by 91.06 ml than open surgery (p = 0.044). Operation time was longer by 49.34 min (p = 0.000). The length of hospital stay was shorter by 2.64 days (p = 0.003). Incisional length was shorter by 9.23 cm (p = 0.000). Fluid intake was shorter by 0.70 day (p = 0.001). Bowel movement was earlier by 0.95 day (p = 0.000). Incidence of complications, blood transfusion, and 30 days death were significantly lower in laparoscopic surgery than in open surgery (p = 0.011, 0.000, 0.01). But there was no significant difference in lymph nodes (p = 0.535) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.924). There was also no significant difference in 3 and 5 years overall survival (p = 0.298, 0.966), disease-free survival (p = 0.487, 0.356), local recurrence (p = 0.270, 0.649), and no difference in 5 years distant recurrence (p = 0.838).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is a mini-injured approach which can cure colorectal cancer safely and radically, and it is not different from conventional open surgery in long-term effectiveness, so laparoscopic surgery can be tried to widely use in colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445673     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1827-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ohtani; Yutaka Tamamori; Takashi Azuma; Yoshihiro Mori; Yukio Nishiguchi; Kiyoshi Maeda; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

4.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection.

Authors:  M Braga; M Frasson; W Zuliani; A Vignali; N Pecorelli; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Jing Gong; De-Bing Shi; Xin-Xiang Li; San-Jun Cai; Zu-Qing Guan; Ye Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Oxidative stress markers in laparoscopic versus open colectomy for cancer: a double-blind randomized study.

Authors:  George Pappas-Gogos; Constantinos Tellis; Konstantinos Lasithiotakis; Alexandros D Tselepis; Konstantinos Tsimogiannis; Evangelos Tsimoyiannis; George Chalkiadakis; Emmanuel Chrysos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Neudecker; F Klein; R Bittner; T Carus; A Stroux; W Schwenk
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  24 in total

1.  Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery results in reduced wound complication and overall morbidity.

Authors:  Young-Kyu Park
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-08

2.  Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Hayashi; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Katsuhiro Ogawa; Yoshiaki Ikuta; Hideyuki Tanaka; Kenichi Ogata; Koichi Doi; Hiroshi Takamori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Endoscopic tattooing to aid tumour localisation in colon cancer: the need for standardisation.

Authors:  I S Reynolds; M H Majeed; I Soric; M Whelan; J Deasy; D A McNamara
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: comparative analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Weizheng Sheng; Bo Zhang; Weifeng Chen; Dayong Gu; Weidong Gao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

5.  Risk factors affecting hospital stay among patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miren Orive; Urko Aguirre; Nerea Gonzalez; Santiago Lázaro; Maximino Redondo; Marisa Bare; Rocío Anula; Eduardo Briones; Antonio Escobar; Cristina Sarasqueta; Susana Garcia-Gutierrez; José M Quintana
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Disparities in the Utilization of Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Cancer in Rural Nebraska: A Call for Placement and Training of Rural General Surgeons.

Authors:  Kelli Gruber; Amr S Soliman; Kendra Schmid; Bryan Rettig; June Ryan; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Lymph node yield in right colectomy for cancer: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

Authors:  M Widmar; M Keskin; P Strombom; P Beltran; O S Chow; J J Smith; G M Nash; J Shia; D Russell; J Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Risk of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic versus open colectomy.

Authors:  Alice C A Murray; Cody Chiuzan; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Surgical technology and pharmacology of hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker; Kurt Van der Speeten
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02

10.  Short- and Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Rectal Cancer Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Open Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Nienhüser; Patrick Heger; Robin Schmitz; Yakup Kulu; Markus K Diener; Johannes Klose; Martin Schneider; Beat P Müller-Stich; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Andre L Mihaljevic; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.