Literature DB >> 25950748

A comparison of fluctuations of Campylobacter and Escherichia coli concentrations on broiler chicken carcasses during processing in two slaughterhouses.

Ewa Pacholewicz1, Arno Swart2, Maarten Schipper2, Betty G M Gortemaker3, Jaap A Wagenaar4, Arie H Havelaar5, Len J A Lipman3.   

Abstract

The causes of differences in Campylobacter and Escherichia coli concentrations on broiler chicken carcasses after chilling between slaughterhouses are not fully identified. Therefore, it is a challenge for slaughterhouses to comply with Process Hygiene Criteria for broiler meat. The aim of the study was to identify which processing steps contribute to increases or decreases in Campylobacter and E. coli concentrations within and between two slaughterhouses. Identifying the processing steps with variable performance could explain the differences in bacterial concentrations after chilling between slaughterhouses. Thermotolerant Campylobacter and E. coli concentrations on carcasses during broiler processing were measured during the summer period in 21 trials after bleeding, scalding, defeathering, evisceration and chilling. In two slaughterhouses with comparable Campylobacter and E. coli concentrations in the incoming batches (after bleeding), the mean log10 concentrations are found to be significantly different after chilling. Campylobacter concentrations decreased by 1.40 log10 in Slaughterhouse 1 and by 1.86 log10 in Slaughterhouse 2, whereas E. coli decreased by 2.19 log10 in Slaughterhouse 1 and by 2.84 log10 in Slaughterhouse 2. Higher concentrations of Campylobacter and E. coli on carcasses after chilling were observed in Slaughterhouse 1 in which an increase in concentrations was observed after evisceration. The effect of processing on Campylobacter and E. coli concentrations in Slaughterhouse 1 did not differ between batches. In Slaughterhouse 2, the effect of processing on the concentrations of both bacteria varied over batches. Changes in E. coli concentration levels during processing were similar to Campylobacter except for defeathering. E. coli concentration significantly decreased after defeathering in both slaughterhouses, whereas Campylobacter increased in Slaughterhouse 2 and in Slaughterhouse 1 no significant changes were observed. The patterns of increases and decreases in bacterial concentrations during processing are specific for each slaughterhouse. Inhomogeneous patterns potentially explain the differences in concentrations after chilling between slaughterhouses. Critical processing steps should be validated in each slaughterhouse by longitudinal studies and potentially based on E. coli. E. coli has a potential to be used as an indicator of processing hygiene, because the impact of most of the studied processing steps was similar as for Campylobacter.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Poultry; Process Hygiene Criteria; Slaughter hygiene

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25950748     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  6 in total

1.  Management Strategies for Prevention of Campylobacter Infections Through the Poultry Food Chain: A European Perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Alter; Felix Reich
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Bacterial contamination of chicken meat in slaughterhouses and the associated risk factors: A nationwide study in Thailand.

Authors:  Kunnanut Klaharn; Duangporn Pichpol; Tongkorn Meeyam; Thanida Harintharanon; Patpong Lohaanukul; Veerasak Punyapornwithaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Adaptation response of Pseudomonas fragi on refrigerated solid matrix to a moderate electric field.

Authors:  Wenbo Chen; Honghai Hu; Chunjiang Zhang; Feng Huang; Dequan Zhang; Hong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Analysis of a poultry slaughter process: Influence of process stages on the microbiological contamination of broiler carcasses.

Authors:  Denise Althaus; Claudio Zweifel; Roger Stephan
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2017-11-06

Review 5.  Reviewing Interventions against Enterobacteriaceae in Broiler Processing: Using Old Techniques for Meeting the New Challenges of ESBL E. coli?

Authors:  Michaela Projahn; Ewa Pacholewicz; Evelyne Becker; Guido Correia-Carreira; Niels Bandick; Annemarie Kaesbohrer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Antimicrobial resistance genes aph(3')-III, erm(B), sul2 and tet(W) abundance in animal faeces, meat, production environments and human faeces in Europe.

Authors:  Dongsheng Yang; Dick J J Heederik; Peter Scherpenisse; Liese Van Gompel; Roosmarijn E C Luiken; Katharina Wadepohl; Magdalena Skarżyńska; Eri Van Heijnsbergen; Inge M Wouters; Gerdit D Greve; Betty G M Jongerius-Gortemaker; Monique Tersteeg-Zijderveld; Lützen Portengen; Katharina Juraschek; Jennie Fischer; Magdalena Zając; Dariusz Wasyl; Jaap A Wagenaar; Dik J Mevius; Lidwien A M Smit; Heike Schmitt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.758

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.