Literature DB >> 25948709

Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Variation in stomatal conductance and its genetic correlation with crop productivity.

J Basnayake1, P A Jackson2, N G Inman-Bamber3, P Lakshmanan4.   

Abstract

Stomatal conductance (g(s)) and canopy temperature have been used to estimate plant water status in many crops. The behaviour of g(s) in sugarcane indicates that the internal leaf water status is controlled by regular opening and closing of stomata. A large number of g(s) measurements obtained across varying moisture regimes, locations, and crop cycles with a diverse sugarcane germplasm composed of introgression, and commercial clones indicated that there is a high genetic variation for g(s) that can be exploited in a breeding programme. Regardless of the environmental influences on the expression of this trait, moderate heritability was observed across 51 sets of individual measurements made on replicated trials over 3 years. The clone×water status interaction (G×E) variation was smaller than the clone (G) variation on many occasions. A wide range of genetic correlations (r(g)= -0.29 to 0.94) between g(s) and yield were observed across test environments in all three different production regions used. Canopy conductance (g(c)) based on g(s) and leaf area index (LAI) showed a stronger genetic correlation than the g(s) with cane yield (tonnes of cane per hectare; TCH) at 12 months (mature crop). The regression analysis of input weather data for the duration of measurements showed that the predicted values of r(g) correlated with the maximum temperature (r=0.47) during the measurements and less with other environmental variables. These results confirm that the g(c) could have potential as a criterion for early-stage selection of clones in sugarcane breeding programmes.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conductance; genetic correlation; genetic variances; heritability; sugarcane.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948709     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current breeding and genomic approaches to enhance the cane and sugar productivity under abiotic stress conditions.

Authors:  Mintu Ram Meena; Ravinder Kumar; Appunu Chinnaswamy; Ramaiyan Karuppaiyan; Neeraj Kulshreshtha; Bakshi Ram
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.893

2.  Bioinformatic analyses to uncover genes involved in trehalose metabolism in the polyploid sugarcane.

Authors:  Lauana Pereira de Oliveira; Bruno Viana Navarro; João Pedro de Jesus Pereira; Adriana Rios Lopes; Marina C M Martins; Diego Mauricio Riaño-Pachón; Marcos Silveira Buckeridge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Sugarcane Water Stress Tolerance Mechanisms and Its Implications on Developing Biotechnology Solutions.

Authors:  Thais H S Ferreira; Max S Tsunada; Denis Bassi; Pedro Araújo; Lucia Mattiello; Giovanna V Guidelli; Germanna L Righetto; Vanessa R Gonçalves; Prakash Lakshmanan; Marcelo Menossi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Effects of Water Regime, Genotype, and Formative Stages on the Agro-Physiological Response of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) to Drought.

Authors:  Jose Arnel O Reyes; Arvin S Carpentero; Primitivo Jose A Santos; Evelyn F Delfin
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-23

5.  Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with canopy temperature in soybean.

Authors:  Sumandeep K Bazzer; Larry C Purcell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Genetic controls of short- and long-term stomatal CO2 responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Karin S L Johansson; Mohamed El-Soda; Ellen Pagel; Rhonda C Meyer; Kadri Tõldsepp; Anders K Nilsson; Mikael Brosché; Hannes Kollist; Johan Uddling; Mats X Andersson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Physiological, nutritional, and molecular responses of Brazilian sugarcane cultivars under stress by aluminum.

Authors:  Mariane de Souza Oliveira; Sâmara Vieira Rocha; Vanessa Karine Schneider; Flavio Henrique-Silva; Marcio Roberto Soares; Andrea Soares-Costa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.