Literature DB >> 12521364

Male versus female breast cancers. A population-based comparative immunohistochemical analysis.

D Muir1, R Kanthan, S C Kanthan.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The rate of male breast cancer is a small fraction of that observed in females, thus severely limiting our understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition. It remains unclear whether the biological behavior and tumor progression associated with male breast cancer parallel that of the female form.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immunohistochemical profile of male breast carcinomas and to compare this profile with that of stage-matched female breast cancers.
DESIGN: Seventy-five cases of primary male breast cancer were identified using the records of the Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation over a period of 26 years (1970-1996). Fifty-nine of these cases had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks available for the purposes of this study. All cases were reviewed and a standardized modified Bloom-Richardson grading criterion was applied. Estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, c-Erb-B2 expression, p53 expression, and Bcl-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results from 240 consecutive cases of stage-matched female breast cancers analyzed in the same laboratory were used as a standard set for comparison.
RESULTS: Male breast cancers tended to be high grade (85% grade 3) in comparison with the female breast cancers (50% grade 3). In descriptive analysis across all stages of disease, male carcinomas were more frequently estrogen receptor positive (81% vs 69%) than their female counterparts. Despite their high grade, they were less likely to overexpress p53 (9% vs 28%) and Erb-B2 (5% vs 17%) than the female counterparts. There was no significant difference in either progesterone receptor (63% vs 56%) or Bcl-2 (79% vs 76%) overexpression. Stratified analysis by stage-matched controls showed no statistically significant differences among the men and women with stage I disease. However, in stage II-matched samples, statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups. The male cancers were more likely to overexpress estrogen receptor (81.6% vs 64.4%, P = .04), progesterone receptor (71.1% vs 47.5%, P = .01), and Bcl-2 (78.9% vs 69.4%, P = .20). They also showed statistically significant lower expression of p53 (7.9% vs 36.3%, P = .001) and Erb-B2 (5.3% vs 23.8% P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Male breast cancers display distinct immunophenotypic differences from those occurring in women, implying a different pathogenesis in the evolution and progression of this disease. Such differences may play key roles in therapeutic management, warranting different treatment strategies in comparison to female breast cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12521364     DOI: 10.5858/2003-127-36-MVFB

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  38 in total

1.  Outcome of non-metastatic male breast cancer: 118 patients.

Authors:  Ulkü Yalçıntaş Arslan; Berna Oksüzoğlu; Nuriye Ozdemir; Sercan Aksoy; Necati Alkış; Ayşe Gök; Mehmet Ali Kaplan; Mahmut Gümüş; Veli Berk; Doğan Uncu; Meltem Baykara; Dilşen Colak; Ummügül Uyetürk; Ibrahim Türker; Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  BRCAPRO 6.0 Model Validation in Male Patients Presenting for BRCA Testing.

Authors:  Zahi I Mitri; Michelle Jackson; Carolyn Garby; Juhee Song; Sharon H Giordano; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Claire N Singletary; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Banu K Arun; Jennifer K Litton
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-06

Review 3.  Is routine pathological evaluation of tissue from gynecomastia necessary? A 15-year retrospective pathological and literature review.

Authors:  Jenna-Lynn Senger; Geethan Chandran; Rani Kanthan
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

4.  Intracystic Papillary Carcinoma of the Breast in Males. In Search of the Optimal Treatment for this Rare Disease.

Authors:  Michael Stamatakos; Charikleia Stefanaki; Theodora Stasinou; Evaggelia Papantoni; Ioannis Alexiou; Konstantinos Kontzoglou
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Treatment of invasive male breast cancer: a 40-year single-institution experience.

Authors:  Icro Meattini; L Livi; D Franceschini; C Saieva; V Scotti; D Casella; V Criscenti; I Zanna; F Meacci; E Gerlain; B Agresti; M Mangoni; F Paiar; G Simontacchi; D Greto; J Nori; S Bianchi; L Cataliotti; G Biti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Lobular Breast Cancer in a Male Patient with a Previous History of Irradiation Due to Hodgkin's Disease.

Authors:  Srdjan Ninkovic; Goran Azanjac; Milan Knezevic; Dragce Radovanovic; Dragan Canovic; Jasmina Nedovic; Slobodanka Mitrovic
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  HER2-positive male breast cancer: an update.

Authors:  Laura Ottini; Carlo Capalbo; Piera Rizzolo; Valentina Silvestri; Giuseppe Bronte; Sergio Rizzo; Antonio Russo
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2010-10-04

8.  Male breast cancer according to tumor subtype and race: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Christina A Clarke; Daphne Lichtensztajn; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Investigation of adverse-event-related costs for patients with metastatic breast cancer in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Sara Hurvitz; Annie Guerin; Melissa Brammer; Ellie Guardino; Zheng-Yi Zhou; Dominick Latremouille Viau; Eric Q Wu; Deepa Lalla
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-08-01

10.  Clinicopathological study of male breast carcinoma: 24 years of experience.

Authors:  Parveen Shah; Irfan Robbani; Omar Shah
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.