| Literature DB >> 25948064 |
Alexander Yaw Debrah1, Sabine Specht2, Ute Klarmann-Schulz3, Linda Batsa4, Sabine Mand2, Yeboah Marfo-Debrekyei4, Rolf Fimmers5, Bettina Dubben2, Alexander Kwarteng4, Mike Osei-Atweneboana6, Daniel Boakye7, Arcangelo Ricchiuto3, Marcelle Büttner8, Ohene Adjei9, Charles D Mackenzie10, Achim Hoerauf2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ivermectin (IVM) has been the drug of choice for the treatment of onchocerciasis. However, there have been reports of persistent microfilaridermia in individuals from an endemic area in Ghana after many rounds of IVM, raising concerns of suboptimal response or even the emergence of drug resistance. Because it is considered risky to continue relying only on IVM to combat this phenomenon, we assessed the effect of targeting the Onchocerca volvulus Wolbachia endosymbionts with doxycycline for these individuals with suboptimal response.Entities:
Keywords: Onchocerca volvulus; Wolbachia; doxycycline; ivermectin; suboptimal response
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25948064 PMCID: PMC4518165 DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Infect Dis ISSN: 1058-4838 Impact factor: 9.079
Patient Baseline Data
| Characteristic | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Doxycycline | Placebo | ||
| No. of patients | 84 | 83 | |
| Age, y | |||
| Mean ± SD | 35.45 ± 9.46 | 39.60 ± 9.08 | |
| Weight, kg | |||
| Mean ± SD | 59.44 ± 8.25 | 57.23 ± 7.89 | |
| Sex, No. | |||
| Female | 18 (21.4%) | 24 (28.9%) | |
| Male | 66 (78.6%) | 59 (71.1%) | |
| IVM rounds | |||
| Mean ± SD | 10.40 ± 3.52 | 10.72 ± 3.36 | |
| Min–Max | 4–17 | 0–17 | |
| Median | 10 | 10 | |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 7.0, 13.8 | 9.0, 13.0 | |
| No. of rounds | |||
| 0 | 0 (0%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
| 4 | 3 (3.6%) | 2 (2.4%) | |
| 5 | 3 (3.6%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
| 6 | 8 (9.5%) | 4 (4.8%) | |
| 7 | 8 (9.5%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
| 8 | 3 (3.6%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
| 9 | 10 (11.9%) | 8 (9.6%) | |
| 10 | 9 (10.7%) | 18 (21.7%) | |
| 11 | 9 (10.7%) | 11 (13.3%) | |
| 12 | 8 (9.5%) | 7 (8.4%) | |
| 13 | 2 (2.4%) | 3 (3.6%) | |
| 14 | 7 (8.3%) | 7 (8.4%) | |
| 15 | 8 (9.5%) | 8 (9.6%) | |
| 16 | 2 (2.4%) | 1 (1.2%) | |
| 17 | 4 (4.8%) | 4 (4.8%) | |
| No. of palpated nodules | |||
| Total No. | 206 | 198 | |
| Mean ± SD | 2.45 ± 1.41 | 2.39 ± 1.79 | |
| Median | 2 | 2 | |
| No. of palpated sites | |||
| Total No. | 136 | 127 | |
| Mean ± SD | 1.62 ± 0.79 | 1.53 ± 0.80 | |
| Median | 1 | 1 | |
Abbreviations: IVM, ivermectin; SD, standard deviation.
a Student t test.
b Fisher exact test.
c Mann–Whitney U test.
Microfilarial Densitiesa
| Study Time Point | ITT (n = 167) | Treatment-PP (n = 147) | Treatment and-IVM-PP (n = 87) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doxycycline | Placebo | Doxycycline | Placebo | Doxycycline | Placebo | |
| Baseline | ||||||
| Mf positive | 47/84 (56.0%) | 48/83 (57.8%) | 40/71 (56.3%) | 43/76 (56.6%) | 20/42 (47.6%) | 23/45 (51.1%) |
| | ||||||
| Mean ± SD | 2.30 ± 6.29 | 3.23 ± 8.69 | 1.90 ± 4.35 | 3.46 ± 9.05 | 0.84 ± 2.66 | 3.27 ± 10.51 |
| GMc | 0.78 | 1.03 | 0.75 | 1.08 | 0.4 | 0.82 |
| Min–Max | 0–45.62 | 0–65.99 | 0–24.87 | 0–65.99 | 0–17.02 | 0–65.99 |
| Median | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0 | 0.13 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 0, 1.11 | 0, 1.94 | 0, 1.11 | 0, 2.00 | 0, 0.63 | 0, 0.97 |
| | ||||||
| 12 mo | ||||||
| Mf positive | 8/73 (11.0%) | 44/72 (61.1%) | 7/69 (10.1%) | 42/70 (60.0%) | 1/40 (2.5%) | 24/44 (54.5%) |
| | ||||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.87 ± 3.74 | 4.50 ± 8.11 | 0.90 ± 3.85 | 4.33 ± 8.10 | 0.70 ± 4.43 | 4.01 ± 7.24 |
| GMc | 0.21 | 1.68 | 0.21 | 1.58 | 0.09 | 1.47 |
| Min–Max | 0–28.00 | 0–38.63 | 0–28.00 | 0–38.63 | 0–28.00 | 0–33.86 |
| Median | 0 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.81 | 0 | 0.52 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 0, 0 | 0, 4.50 | 0, 0 | 0, 4.11 | 0, 0 | 0, 5.71 |
| | ||||||
| 20 mo | ||||||
| Mf positive | 5/76 (6.6%) | 50/74 (67.6%) | 2/67 (3.0%) | 47/70 (67.1%) | 1/42 (2.4%) | 27/45 (60.0%) |
| | ||||||
| Mean ± SD | 0.75 ± 4.57 | 3.99 ± 9.05 | 0.56 ± 4.35 | 3.88 ± 9.12 | 0.85 ± 5.49 | 1.87 ± 4.24 |
| GMc | 0.12 | 1.35 | 0.07 | 1.29 | 0.09 | 0.83 |
| Min–Max | 0–35.60 | 0–46.58 | 0–35.60 | 0–46.58 | 0–35.60 | 0–24.46 |
| Median | 0 | 0.65 | 0 | 0.52 | 0 | 0.21 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 0, 0 | 0, 2.91 | 0, 0 | 0, 2.41 | 0, 0 | 0, 1.24 |
| | ||||||
| Persistently Mf positivee | 1/69 (1.4%) | 24/69 (34.8%) | 0/65 (0%) | 24/68 (35.3%) | 0/40 (0%) | 15/44 (34.1%) |
Abbreviations: GM, geometric mean; ITT, intention to treat; IVM, ivermectin; Mf, microfilariae; PP, per protocol; SD, standard deviation.
a The ITT set includes all patients who received the study drugs for at least 1 day. The Treatment-PP set includes all people who took the treatment according to protocol and on this basis another set was created, only including people who also took part in both rounds of mass drug administration between treatment and 20 months of follow-up (Treatment and IVM-PP).
b Fisher exact test.
c The GM was calculated by adding 1 to all values and after the calculation 1 was again subtracted from the result.
d Mann–Whitney U test.
e Number of participants who were persistently Mf positive over all 3 timepoints.
Effect of Doxycycline Treatment on Presence of Wolbachia in Worms
| Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/ Nodulesa | No. of Living Female Wormsb | No. of Living Male Wormsb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allc | With | Allc | With | |||||||
| Many | Few | None | Many | Few | None | |||||
| Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/152 | 117 | 1 | 5 | 111 | 41 | 0 | 3 | 36 |
| Placebo | 20 | 63/199 | 184 | 60 | 80 | 35 | 54 | 5 | 19 | 26 |
a Only evaluable patients/nodules are included; nodules with newly acquired worms only are subtracted.
b Newly acquired worms were subtracted (doxycycline, n = 8 females; placebo, n = 7 females).
c Although the number of all living worms is given to make the numbers consistent to the other tables, in 15 worms, it was not possible to distinguish if the worm had many, few, or no Wolbachia, due to too little worm material in the respective histological sections. Therefore, “All” is not always a summary of the 3 categories.
d Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding absence of Wolbachia (bP < .001 for female and male worms respectively, Fisher exact test).
Effect of Doxycycline Treatment on Embryogenesis
| Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/Nodulesa | No. of Living Female Wormsb | No. of Nodules | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Embryosc | Sperms in Uterusd | All | With Intact Microfilariaee | ||||||
| Not Judgeable | Uterus Empty, Oocytes Only | Normal | Degenerated | |||||||
| Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/152 | 117 | 13 | 93 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 152 | 0 |
| Placebo | 20 | 63/199 | 184 | 16 | 76 | 89 | 3 | 54 | 199 | 61 |
a Only evaluable patients/nodules are included; nodules with newly acquired worms only are subtracted.
b Newly acquired worms were subtracted (doxycycline, n = 8 females; placebo, n = 7 females).
c Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the presence of normal vs degenerated embryogenesis (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
d Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the number of worms found with sperms within the uterus (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
e Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the proportion of nodules with intact microfilariae (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
Macrofilaricidal Effect of Doxycycline Treatment
| Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/Nodulesa | No. of Female Wormsb | No. of Male Wormsb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Dead Femalesc (%) | All | Dead Males (%) | |||
| Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/152 | 253 | 136 (54%) | 50 | 9 (18%) |
| Placebo | 20 | 63/199 | 300 | 116 (39%) | 58 | 4 (7%) |
a Only evaluable patients/nodules are included; nodules with newly acquired worms only were subtracted.
b Newly acquired worms were subtracted (doxycycline, n = 8 females; placebo, n = 7 females).
c Significant difference between the doxycycline and the placebo group regarding the proportion of dead female worms (P < .001, Fisher exact test).
Age Pattern of Wormsa
| Treatment Group | Time, mo | No. of Patients/Nodulesb | No. of Living Female Worms | No. of Living Male Worms | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Age | Allc | Age | |||||||||
| Newly Acquired | Young | Middle | Old | Newly Acquired | Young | Middle | Old | |||||
| Doxycycline (6 wk) | 20 | 56/157 | 125 | 8 | 12 | 48 | 57 | 41 | 0 | 2 | 27 | 10 |
| Placebo | 20 | 63/205 | 191 | 7 | 30 | 73 | 81 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 34 | 17 |
a Characteristics for the age of a worm included loss of body wall integrity, loss of nuclei of all organs, and absence of aspartic protease (APR) staining. Very degenerated worms, still APR positive, were classified as moribund and grouped in the category “dead.” Older worms were larger and presented degenerated tissues. Gomori iron stain showed that the worms accumulated more iron with increasing age, first in the gut and later in other organs. Using an antibody against O. volvulus lysosomal aspartic protease, the gut of young worms was stained only weakly, whereas it was stronger in older worms, accompanied by additional staining of hypodermis and epithelia. These criteria as well as morphological findings (diameter, position within the nodule) were used to discriminate newly acquired worms [4, 15].
b Only evaluable patients/nodules are included. In contrast to Tables 4–6, newly acquired worms are included.
c In 3 male worms, it was not possible to distinguish the age pattern of the worm in the respective histological sections. Therefore, “All” is not always a summary of the 4 categories.
Palpated, Operated, and Evaluated Nodules and Sitesa
| Study Time Point | No. of Nodules | No. of Sites | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doxycycline | Placebo | Doxycycline | Placebo | |
| Baseline | ||||
| No. of patients | 71 | 76 | 71 | 76 |
| Total No. of nodules/sites | 178 | 182 | 114 | 116 |
| Mean ± SD | 2.51 ± 1.40 | 2.39 ± 1.86 | 1.61 ± 0.78 | 1.53 ± 0.81 |
| Min–Max | 1–6 | 1–11 | 1–4 | 1–4 |
| Median | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 1, 3 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
| | ||||
| 20 mo | ||||
| No. of patients | 67 | 69 | 67 | 69 |
| Total No. of nodules/sites | 137 | 150 | 98 | 104 |
| Mean ± SD | 2.04 ± 1.32 | 2.17 ± 1.68 | 1.46 ± 0.68 | 1.51 ± 0.87 |
| Min–Max | 1–6 | 0–8 | 1–4 | 0–4 |
| Median | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
| | ||||
| Difference 20 mo – baseline | ||||
| No. of patients | 67 | 69 | 67 | 69 |
| Mean ± SD | −0.43 ± 1.03 | −0.09 ± 1.00 | −0.12 ± 0.54 | 0.01 ± 0.56 |
| Min–Max | −5 to 2 | −4 to 2 | −1 to 1 | −2 to 1 |
| Median | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | −1, 0 | 0, 0 | 0, 0 | 0, 0 |
| | ||||
| Operatedc | ||||
| No. of patients | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 |
| Total No. of nodules/sites | 182 | 227 | 99 | 108 |
| Mean ± SD | 2.76 ± 2.18 | 3.44 ± 2.79 | 1.5 ± 0.75 | 1.64 ± 0.97 |
| Min–Max | 1–13 | 1–14 | 1–4 | 1–5 |
| Median | 2 | 2.5 | 1 | 1 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 2, 4 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
| | ||||
| Evaluatedd | ||||
| No. of patients | 56 | 63 | 56 | 63 |
| Total No. of nodules/sites | 152 | 199 | 79 | 97 |
| Mean ± SD | 2.71 ± 2.02 | 3.16 ± 2.39 | 1.41 ± 0.73 | 1.54 ± 0.84 |
| Min–Max | 1–11 | 1–12 | 1–4 | 1–4 |
| Median | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 25th, 75th percentiles | 1, 3 | 2, 4 | 1, 2 | 1, 2 |
| | ||||
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
a The set used here (Treatment-per protocol) includes all people who took the treatment (doxycycline or placebo) according to protocol.
b Mann–Whitney U test.
c In 4 participants, no nodule was found before or after incision.
d Thirteen participants and, in total, 11.5% (n = 47) of all nodules could not be analyzed for parasitic status; the reasons for this exclusion included extensive calcification of the nodule, or being of nononchocercal origin (eg, foreign body granulomas, lipomas, or lymph nodes). An additional 11 nodules were subtracted for containing newly acquired worms only.
Additional Statistical Analysisa
| Per Patientb | Per Single Wormc | Regression Analysisd (Repeated Factor: Patient) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP | ITT | PP | ITT | PP | ITT | |
| Dead females | ||||||
| OR = 1.8438 | OR = 1.6987 | OR = 1.9809 | OR = 1.8134 | |||
| Live females | ||||||
| OR = 0.5424 | OR = 0.5887 | OR = 0.5048 | OR = 0.5514 | |||
| Many bacteria (vs no bacteria) | ||||||
| OR = 0.0053 | OR = 0.0609 | OR = 0.0056 | OR = 0.0949 | |||
| Few bacteria (vs no bacteria) | ||||||
| OR = 0.0197 | OR = 0.0444 | OR = 0.019 | OR = 0.044 | |||
| No bacteria (vs few ± many bacteria) | ||||||
| OR = 74 | OR = 19.2287 | OR = 67.3149 | OR = 15.561 | |||
| Normal vs degenerated embryogenesis | ||||||
| OR = 0.0193 | OR = 0.0666 | OR = 0.0234 | OR = 0.0844 | |||
| Sperms in uterus | n.d.e | n.d.e | n.d.e | |||
| OR = 0.2006 | OR = 0.1337 | |||||
Abbreviations: ITT, intention to treat; n.d., not done; OR, odds ratio; PP, per protocol.
a The PP data set included all participants who took the treatment according to protocol and were present for the nodulectomies at 20 months. This data set was used for the primary analyses of all histological data. The ITT set included all patients who received the study drugs for at least 1 day. This data set was used to describe all baseline data and the adverse reactions. It was additionally used to confirm the primary PP analysis. In this case, missing values from participants who were not present for nodulectomies (n = 19) were replaced by a worst-case scenario (1 nodule containing 1 live female, Wolbachia-positive worm with normal embryogenesis and intact microfilariae).
b Analysis was performed on the per-patient level using the Mann–Whitney U test.
c Analysis was performed on the single-worm level using Fisher exact test.
d Analysis was performed by regression analysis (Proc Genmod) with the patient as repeated factor to account for dependence within patient. ORs are given for the doxycycline group.
e Not done as the ITT worst-case scenario was not defined for this parameter.