Literature DB >> 25944701

Assessment of phthalates/phthalate alternatives in children's toys and childcare articles: Review of the report including conclusions and recommendation of the Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Paul J Lioy1, Russ Hauser2, Chris Gennings3, Holger M Koch4, Philip E Mirkes5, Bernard A Schwetz6, Andreas Kortenkamp7.   

Abstract

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) convened a Chronic Hazard Advisory Panel (CHAP) on Phthalates found in children's toys, and childcare products, and in products used by women of childbearing age. The CHAP conducted a risk assessment on phthalates and phthalate substitutes, and made recommendations to either ban, impose an interim ban, or allow the continued use of phthalates and phthalate substitutes in the above products. After a review of the literature, the evaluation included toxic end points of primary concern, biomonitoring results, extant exposure reconstruction, and epidemiological results. The health end points chosen were associated with the rat phthalate syndrome, which is characterized by malformations of the epididymis, vas deferens, seminal vesicles, prostate, external genitalia (hypospadias), and by cryptorchidism (undescended testes), retention of nipples/areolae, and demasculinization (~incomplete masculinization) of the perineum, resulting in reduced anogenital distance. Risk assessment demonstrated that some phthalates should be permanently banned, removed from the banned list, or remain interim banned. Biomonitoring and toxicology data provided the strongest basis for a mixture risk assessment. In contrast, external exposure data were the weakest and need to be upgraded for epidemiological studies and risk assessments. Such studies would focus on routes and sources. The review presents recommendations and uncertainties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25944701     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2015.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  53 in total

1.  The relationship between anogenital distance and reproductive hormone levels in adult men.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Tina K Jensen; R Chanc Walters; Niels E Skakkebaek; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Disruption of androgen-regulated male reproductive development by di(n-butyl) phthalate during late gestation in rats is different from flutamide.

Authors:  E Mylchreest; M Sar; R C Cattley; P M Foster
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Do phthalates affect steroidogenesis by the human fetal testis? Exposure of human fetal testis xenografts to di-n-butyl phthalate.

Authors:  R T Mitchell; A J Childs; R A Anderson; S van den Driesche; P T K Saunders; C McKinnell; W H B Wallace; C J H Kelnar; R M Sharpe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Environmental phthalate exposure in relation to reproductive outcomes and other health endpoints in humans.

Authors:  Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Intake of phthalates and di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate: results of the Integrated Exposure Assessment Survey based on duplicate diet samples and biomonitoring data.

Authors:  Hermann Fromme; Ludwig Gruber; Martin Schlummer; Gerd Wolz; Sigrun Böhmer; Jürgen Angerer; Richard Mayer; Bernhard Liebl; Gabriele Bolte
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Maternal and infant urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations: are they related?

Authors:  S Sathyanarayana; A M Calafat; F Liu; S H Swan
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Association between prenatal exposure to phthalates and the health of newborns.

Authors:  Po-Chin Huang; Pao-Lin Kuo; Yen-Yin Chou; Shio-Jean Lin; Ching-Chang Lee
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-18

9.  Estimated daily phthalate exposures in a population of mothers of male infants exhibiting reduced anogenital distance.

Authors:  Kevin Marsee; Tracey J Woodruff; Daniel A Axelrad; Antonia M Calafat; Shanna H Swan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Phthalates impair germ cell development in the human fetal testis in vitro without change in testosterone production.

Authors:  Romain Lambrot; Vincent Muczynski; Charlotte Lécureuil; Gaëlle Angenard; Hervé Coffigny; Catherine Pairault; Delphine Moison; René Frydman; René Habert; Virginie Rouiller-Fabre
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Cumulative effects of antiandrogenic chemical mixtures and their relevance to human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Kembra L Howdeshell; Andrew K Hotchkiss; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 5.840

2.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of human and animal evidence of prenatal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure and changes in male anogenital distance.

Authors:  David C Dorman; Weihsueh Chiu; Barbara F Hales; Russ Hauser; Kamin J Johnson; Ellen Mantus; Susan Martel; Karen A Robinson; Andrew A Rooney; Ruthann Rudel; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Susan L Schantz; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.393

3.  Temporal Trends of Exposure to Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives in California Pregnant Women during 2007-2013: Comparison with Other Populations.

Authors:  Hyeong-Moo Shin; Upasana Dhar; Antonia M Calafat; Vy Nguyen; Rebecca J Schmidt; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Dose Addition Models Based on Biologically Relevant Reductions in Fetal Testosterone Accurately Predict Postnatal Reproductive Tract Alterations by a Phthalate Mixture in Rats.

Authors:  Kembra L Howdeshell; Cynthia V Rider; Vickie S Wilson; Johnathan R Furr; Christy R Lambright; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Effects of oral exposure to the phthalate substitute acetyl tributyl citrate on female reproduction in mice.

Authors:  Lindsay M Rasmussen; Nivedita Sen; Xiaosong Liu; Zelieann R Craig
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Ordinal dose-response modeling approach for the phthalate syndrome.

Authors:  Todd D Blessinger; Susan Y Euling; Lily Wang; Karen A Hogan; Christine Cai; Gary Klinefelter; Anne-Marie Saillenfait
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Phthalates and alternative plasticizers and potential for contact exposure from children's backpacks and toys.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Yaoxing Wu; John C Little; Linsey C Marr
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Determinants of phthalate exposure among a U.S.-based group of Latino workers.

Authors:  Janice A Allotey; Meleah Boyle; Amir Sapkota; Linyan Zhu; Roger D Peng; Mary A Garza; Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.840

9.  Medical Device Industry Approaches for Addressing Sources of Failing Cytotoxicity Scores.

Authors:  Helin Räägel; Audrey Turley; Trevor Fish; Jeralyn Franson; Thor Rollins; Sarah Campbell; Matthew R Jorgensen
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 10.  Approaches to Children's Exposure Assessment: Case Study with Diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP).

Authors:  Gary Ginsberg; Justine Ginsberg; Brenda Foos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.