Literature DB >> 25943954

Frequency and socio-psychological impact of taunting in school-age patients with cleft lip-palate surgical repair.

A Lorot-Marchand1, P Guerreschi2, P Pellerin2, V Martinot2, C C Gbaguidi3, C Neiva3, B Devauchelle3, C Frochisse2, M L Poli-Merol1, C Francois-Fiquet4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cleft lip-palate (CLP) is a "social" pathology because of its impact on the child's facial appearance and speech. School is the first place where children are confronted to others and when they start socializing. Taunting and bullying are common and their psychological impact remains hard to assess. The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of taunting in school and its impact in CLP patients who had surgical repair.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective study where we consecutively included patients ≥ 12 years who had CLP repair. During a multidisciplinary consultation they were asked to complete a questionnaire (3 parts: surgical outcomes, taunting and its impact, socio-economic status) previously approved by our psychologists.
RESULTS: 55 patients were included (37 B, 18 G) (mean age 15.5 years): 11 CL, 13 CP and 31 CLP. 69% of patients reported having suffered from taunting and peer victimization in school. In 84% of the cases, taunting was linked to the CLP defect itself. The teasing started in primary school to reach a peak of aggressiveness in middle school. 42% of patients reported that bullying occurred at least once a day (16/38). Regarding the psychological impact of taunting, 50% of patients reported sadness, 31% depression and 26.3% were marked for life. At one time or another 29% of patients did not want to attend school because of the teasing. The grade retention rate amounted to 37.7% (20/53), and 2 patients were in special education classes. As a matter of fact, 50% of these children repeated their 1st or 2nd year of primary school. Furthermore, 47% of patients wanted to change something to their face, but 63% of them never spoke to their surgeon about additional surgeries even though they were teased in school.
CONCLUSIONS: Taunting is common in children with CLP. This study highlights the high frequency and impact of taunting on the daily lives and self-perception of patients with CLP or CLP repair. It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of this issue in the context of a multidisciplinary approach.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft lip; Cleft palate; School; Self-perception; Stigmatization; Teasing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25943954     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  10 in total

1.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal.

Authors:  Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo J De Clerck; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Academic outcomes of children with orofacial clefts: A review of the literature and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Joanne Constantin; George L Wehby
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.068

3.  Nasolabial Appearance in 5-Year-Old Patients with Repaired Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Lip Repair.

Authors:  Sonja Lux; Matthias Mayr; Michael Schwaiger; Sarah-Jayne Edmondson; Christoph Steiner; Peter Schachner; Alexander Gaggl
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  A Population-Based Exploration of the Social Implications Associated with Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Adam D Glener; Alexander C Allori; Ronnie L Shammas; Anna R Carlson; Irene J Pien; Arthur S Aylsworth; Robert Meyer; Luiz Pimenta; Ronald Strauss; Stephanie Watkins; Jeffrey R Marcus
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-06-29

5.  Volumetric lipoinjection of the fronto-orbital and temporal complex with adipose stem cells for the aesthetic restoration of sequelae of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Yanko Castro-Govea; Amin Vela-Martinez; Luis Alberto Treviño-Garcia
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

Review 6.  Effects of cleft lip and palate on children's psychological health: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abeer Al-Namankany; Abrar Alhubaishi
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-05

7.  The Impact of Cleft Lip/Palate and Surgical Intervention on Adolescent Life Outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce Wydick; Mustafa Zahid; Sam Manning; Jeremiah Maller; Kira Evsanaa; Susann Skjoldhorne; Matthew Bloom; Abhishek Das; Gaurav Deshpande
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.462

8.  Psychiatric Diagnoses in Individuals with Non-Syndromic Oral Clefts: A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dorthe Almind Pedersen; George L Wehby; Jeffrey C Murray; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Appearance and Speech Satisfaction and Their Associations With Psychosocial Difficulties Among Young People With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Sarah N Kelly; Joanna Shearer
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-05-28

10.  Cleft lip/palate and educational attainment: cause, consequence or correlation? A Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Christina Dardani; Laurence J Howe; Nandita Mukhopadhyay; Evie Stergiakouli; Yvonne Wren; Kerry Humphries; Amy Davies; Karen Ho; Seth M Weinberg; Mary L Marazita; Elisabeth Mangold; Kerstin U Ludwig; Caroline L Relton; George Davey Smith; Sarah J Lewis; Jonathan Sandy; Neil M Davies; Gemma C Sharp
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.