Literature DB >> 25943846

Carotid and vertebral injury study (CAVIS) technique for characterization of blunt traumatic aneurysms with reliability assessment.

Christoph J Griessenauer1, Paul Foreman2, Mohammadali M Shoja2, Kimberly P Kicielinski2, John P Deveikis2, Beverly C Walters2, Mark R Harrigan2.   

Abstract

Traumatic aneurysms occur in up to 20% of blunt traumatic extracranial carotid artery injuries. Currently there is no standardized method for characterization of traumatic aneurysms. For the carotid and vertebral injury study (CAVIS), a prospective study of traumatic cerebrovascular injury, we established a method for aneurysm characterization and tested its reliability. Saccular aneurysm size was defined as the greatest linear distance between the expected location of the normal artery wall and the outer edge of the aneurysm lumen ("depth"). Fusiform aneurysm size was defined as the "depth" and longitudinal distance ("length") paralleling the normal artery. The size of the aneurysm relative to the normal artery was also assessed. Reliability measurements were made using four raters who independently reviewed 15 computed tomographic angiograms (CTAs) and 13 digital subtraction angiograms (DSAs) demonstrating a traumatic aneurysm of the internal carotid artery. Raters categorized the aneurysms as either "saccular" or "fusiform" and made measurements. Five scans of each imaging modality were repeated to evaluate intra-rater reliability. Fleiss's free-marginal multi-rater kappa (κ), Cohen's kappa (κ), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined inter- and intra-rater reliability. Inter-rater agreement as to the aneurysm "shape" was almost perfect for CTA (κ = 0.82) and DSA (κ = 0.897). Agreements on aneurysm "depth," "length," "aneurysm plus parent artery," and "parent artery" for CTA and DSA were excellent (ICC > 0.75). Intra-rater agreement as to aneurysm "shape" was substantial to almost perfect (κ > 0.60). The CAVIS method of traumatic aneurysm characterization has remarkable inter- and intra-rater reliability and will facilitate further studies of the natural history and management of extracranial cerebrovascular traumatic aneurysms.
© The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid artery; blunt trauma; dissecting aneurysm; pseudoaneurysm; traumatic aneurysm; traumatic cerebrovascular injury

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25943846      PMCID: PMC4757231          DOI: 10.1177/1591019915582165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  21 in total

1.  Unruptured intracranial aneurysms--risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.

Authors:  S D Walter; M Eliasziw; A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Treatment of posttraumatic internal carotid arterial pseudoaneurysms with endovascular stents.

Authors:  D M Coldwell; Z Novak; R K Ryu; K E Brega; W L Biffl; P J Offner; R J Franciose; J M Burch; E E Moore
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-03

4.  Size ratio can highly predict rupture risk in intracranial small (<5 mm) aneurysms.

Authors:  Daina Kashiwazaki; Satoshi Kuroda
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Endovascular stenting for the treatment of traumatic internal carotid injuries: expanding experience.

Authors:  Joseph DuBose; Gustavo Recinos; Pedro G R Teixeira; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-12

6.  Endovascular repair of traumatic cervical internal carotid artery injuries: a safe and effective treatment option.

Authors:  R Seth; A M Obuchowski; G H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Antithrombotic therapy and endovascular stents are effective treatment for blunt carotid injuries: results from longterm followup.

Authors:  Norma M Edwards; Timothy C Fabian; Jeffrey A Claridge; Shelly D Timmons; Peter E Fischer; Martin A Croce
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Size ratio: a morphological factor predictive of the rupture of cerebral aneurysm?

Authors:  Meihua Li; Zhiqun Jiang; Huiqiang Yu; Tao Hong
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Sujan Dhar; Markus Tremmel; J Mocco; Minsuok Kim; Junichi Yamamoto; Adnan H Siddiqui; L Nelson Hopkins; Hui Meng
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Extracranial traumatic aneurysms due to blunt cerebrovascular injury.

Authors:  Paul M Foreman; Christoph J Griessenauer; Michael Falola; Mark R Harrigan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  2 in total

1.  Wall enhancement of intracranial saccular and fusiform aneurysms may differ in intensity and extension: a pilot study using 7-T high-resolution black-blood MRI.

Authors:  Xinke Liu; Zihao Zhang; Chengcheng Zhu; Junqiang Feng; Peng Liu; Qingle Kong; Xianchang Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Hengwei Jin; Huijian Ge; Yuhua Jiang; David Saloner; Youxiang Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Endovascular treatment of blunt injury of the extracranial internal carotid artery: the prospect and dilemma.

Authors:  Guangming Wang; Chao Li; Jianmin Piao; Baofeng Xu; Jinlu Yu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.