Literature DB >> 2594373

Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract?

D B Elliott1, J Gilchrist, D Whitaker.   

Abstract

LogMAR visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity measurements were made on 39 eyes of 18 cataractous subjects and compared against normative data. Only cataracts of one of the main three morphological cataract types were used--cortical, nuclear and posterior subcapsular. Results indicate that contrast sensitivity decline with cataract is an intermediate and high spatial frequency loss. For nuclear and cortical cataracts with a LogMAR visual acuity of less than 0.5 (Snellen equivalent better than 6/18), there was no loss of contrast sensitivity at the lowest spatial frequency (1 c/deg). For posterior subcapsular cataracts, low spatial frequency contrast sensitivity loss did occur but was unrelated to visual acuity. Glare sensitivity increased for all cataract types. This was related to visual acuity for both cortical and nuclear cataracts but was not for the posterior subcapsular type. It was concluded that contrast and glare sensitivity measurements are a useful part of the assessment of visual function in patients with posterior subcapsular cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2594373     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00800.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  19 in total

Review 1.  Why HID headlights bother older drivers.

Authors:  M A Mainster; G T Timberlake
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Aging and vision.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  On the relation between glare and straylight.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  TuebingenCSTest - a useful method to assess the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Tim Schilling; Arne Ohlendorf; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Paolo Calcatelli; Eleonora Funaro; Marialuisa Martelli; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  The influence of cortical, nuclear, subcortical posterior, and mixed cataract on the results of microperimetry.

Authors:  S Richter-Mueksch; S Sacu; B Weingessel; V P Vécsei-Marlovits; U Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Contrast sensitivity and its determinants in people with diabetes: SN-DREAMS-II, Report No 6.

Authors:  L Gella; R Raman; S S Pal; S Ganesan; T Sharma
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Glare sensitivity in early cataracts.

Authors:  M S Lasa; M J Podgor; M B Datiles; R C Caruso; B V Magno
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Persistent biases in subjective image focus following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Khatuna Parkosadze; Teona Kalmakhelidze; Marina Tolmacheva; Georgi Chichua; Archil Kezeli; Michael A Webster; John S Werner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Loss of contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with LOCS II classified cataracts.

Authors:  L T Chylack; N Padhye; P M Khu; C Wehner; J Wolfe; D McCarthy; B Rosner; J Friend
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.