Literature DB >> 25942386

A Comparison of Accelerometer Accuracy in Older Adults.

Lorraine J Phillips, Gregory F Petroski, Natalie E Markis.   

Abstract

Older adults' gait disorders present challenges for accurate activity monitoring. The current study compared the accuracy of accelerometer-detected to hand-tallied steps in 50 residential care/assisted living residents. Participants completed two walking trials wearing a Fitbit® Tracker and waist-, wrist-, and ankle-mounted Actigraph GT1M. Agreement between accelerometer and observed counts was calculated using concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), accelerometer to observed count ratios, accelerometer and observed count differences, and Bland-Altman plots. Classification and Regression Tree analysis identified minimum gait speed thresholds to achieve accelerometer accuracy ≥0.80. Participants' mean age was 84.2 and gait speed was 0.64 m/s. All accelerometers underestimated true steps. Only the ankle-mounted GT1M demonstrated positive agreement with observed counts (CCC = 0.205). Thresholds for 0.80 accuracy were gait speeds ≥0.56 m/s for the Fitbit and gait speeds ≥0.71 m/s for the ankle-mounted GT1M. Gait speed and accelerometer placement affected activity monitor accuracy in older adults. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25942386     DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20150429-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs        ISSN: 1938-2464            Impact factor:   1.571


  12 in total

1.  Validity of the Fitbit One for Measuring Activity in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors.

Authors:  Jonathan Hui; Richard Heyden; Tim Bao; Nicholas Accettone; Catherine McBay; Julie Richardson; Ada Tang
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 2.  Assessing Daily Physical Activity in Older Adults: Unraveling the Complexity of Monitors, Measures, and Methods.

Authors:  Jennifer A Schrack; Rachel Cooper; Annemarie Koster; Eric J Shiroma; Joanne M Murabito; W Jack Rejeski; Luigi Ferrucci; Tamara B Harris
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 3.  Assessment of Physical Activity in Adults Using Wrist Accelerometers.

Authors:  Fangyu Liu; Amal A Wanigatunga; Jennifer A Schrack
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 4.  Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Michelle M Goto; Robert D Furberg
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 5.  Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data.

Authors:  Lynne M Feehan; Jasmina Geldman; Eric C Sayre; Chance Park; Allison M Ezzat; Ju Young Yoo; Clayon B Hamilton; Linda C Li
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.

Authors:  Salvatore Tedesco; Marco Sica; Andrea Ancillao; Suzanne Timmons; John Barton; Brendan O'Flynn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Older adults' satisfaction of wearing consumer-level activity monitors.

Authors:  Nicolas Farina; Ruth G Lowry
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-10-31

8.  Criterion validity for step counting in four consumer-grade physical activity monitors among older adults with and without rollators.

Authors:  Rasmus Tolstrup Larsen; Christoffer Brun Korfitsen; Carsten Bogh Juhl; Henning Boje Andersen; Henning Langberg; Jan Christensen
Journal:  Eur Rev Aging Phys Act       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.878

9.  Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Its Association with Functional Independence, Quality of Life and In-Hospital Course of Recovery in Elderly Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Laureen V Marsault; Jesper Ryg; Carsten Fladmose Madsen; Anders Holsgaard-Larsen; Jens Lauritsen; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-01-27

10.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.