Literature DB >> 25941372

Stable long-range interhemispheric coordination is supported by direct anatomical projections.

Kelly Shen1, Bratislav Mišić2, Ben N Cipollini3, Gleb Bezgin4, Martin Buschkuehl5, R Matthew Hutchison6, Susanne M Jaeggi7, Ethan Kross8, Scott J Peltier9, Stefan Everling10, John Jonides8, Anthony R McIntosh11, Marc G Berman12.   

Abstract

The functional interaction between the brain's two hemispheres includes a unique set of connections between corresponding regions in opposite hemispheres (i.e., homotopic regions) that are consistently reported to be exceptionally strong compared with other interhemispheric (i.e., heterotopic) connections. The strength of homotopic functional connectivity (FC) is thought to be mediated by the regions' shared functional roles and their structural connectivity. Recently, homotopic FC was reported to be stable over time despite the presence of dynamic FC across both intrahemispheric and heterotopic connections. Here we build on this work by considering whether homotopic FC is also stable across conditions. We additionally test the hypothesis that strong and stable homotopic FC is supported by the underlying structural connectivity. Consistent with previous findings, interhemispheric FC between homotopic regions were significantly stronger in both humans and macaques. Across conditions, homotopic FC was most resistant to change and therefore was more stable than heterotopic or intrahemispheric connections. Across time, homotopic FC had significantly greater temporal stability than other types of connections. Temporal stability of homotopic FC was facilitated by direct anatomical projections. Importantly, temporal stability varied with the change in conductive properties of callosal axons along the anterior-posterior axis. Taken together, these findings suggest a notable role for the corpus callosum in maintaining stable functional communication between hemispheres.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamics; functional connectivity; homotopy; structural connectivity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25941372      PMCID: PMC4443345          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503436112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  60 in total

1.  Differential expansion of neural projection systems in primate brain evolution.

Authors:  J K Rilling; T R Insel
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Cross-species and intraspecies morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  R Olivares; S Michalland; F Aboitiz
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum.

Authors:  F Aboitiz; A B Scheibel; R S Fisher; E Zaidel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-12-11       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Causal effect of disconnection lesions on interhemispheric functional connectivity in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jill X O'Reilly; Paula L Croxson; Saad Jbabdi; Jerome Sallet; Maryann P Noonan; Rogier B Mars; Philip G F Browning; Charles R E Wilson; Anna S Mitchell; Karla L Miller; Matthew F S Rushworth; Mark G Baxter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The retinotopy of visual spatial attention.

Authors:  R B Tootell; N Hadjikhani; E K Hall; S Marrett; W Vanduffel; J T Vaughan; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Identification of optimal structural connectivity using functional connectivity and neural modeling.

Authors:  Gustavo Deco; Anthony R McIntosh; Kelly Shen; R Matthew Hutchison; Ravi S Menon; Stefan Everling; Patric Hagmann; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Topographic organization of V1 projections through the corpus callosum in humans.

Authors:  M Saenz; I Fine
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Loss of resting interhemispheric functional connectivity after complete section of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  James M Johnston; S Neil Vaishnavi; Matthew D Smyth; Dongyang Zhang; Biyu J He; John M Zempel; Joshua S Shimony; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Structural and functional brain rewiring clarifies preserved interhemispheric transfer in humans born without the corpus callosum.

Authors:  Fernanda Tovar-Moll; Myriam Monteiro; Juliana Andrade; Ivanei E Bramati; Rodrigo Vianna-Barbosa; Theo Marins; Erika Rodrigues; Natalia Dantas; Timothy E J Behrens; Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza; Jorge Moll; Roberto Lent
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain.

Authors:  Raymond Salvador; John Suckling; Martin R Coleman; John D Pickard; David Menon; Ed Bullmore
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  44 in total

1.  Disentangling Brain Graphs: A Note on the Conflation of Network and Connectivity Analyses.

Authors:  Sean L Simpson; Paul J Laurienti
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Linking Functional Connectivity and Structural Connectivity Quantitatively: A Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Haiqing Huang; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2016-01-07

3.  Structural-functional decoupling predicts suicide attempts in bipolar disorder patients with a current major depressive episode.

Authors:  Haiteng Jiang; Rongxin Zhu; Shui Tian; Huan Wang; Zhilu Chen; Xinyi Wang; Junneng Shao; Jiaolong Qin; Jiabo Shi; Haiyan Liu; Yu Chen; Zhijian Yao; Qing Lu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Inter-Subject Variability of Axonal Injury in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Ware; Tessa Hart; John Whyte; Amanda Rabinowitz; John A Detre; Junghoon Kim
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Mapping complementary features of cross-species structural connectivity to construct realistic "Virtual Brains".

Authors:  Gleb Bezgin; Ana Solodkin; Rembrandt Bakker; Petra Ritter; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Unique Mapping of Structural and Functional Connectivity on Cognition.

Authors:  Joelle Zimmermann; John D Griffiths; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke.

Authors:  Joshua Sarfaty Siegel; Lenny E Ramsey; Abraham Z Snyder; Nicholas V Metcalf; Ravi V Chacko; Kilian Weinberger; Antonello Baldassarre; Carl D Hacker; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Xuhong Liao; Mingrui Xia; Yong He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Damage to the shortest structural paths between brain regions is associated with disruptions of resting-state functional connectivity after stroke.

Authors:  Joseph C Griffis; Nicholas V Metcalf; Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Structural Disconnections Explain Brain Network Dysfunction after Stroke.

Authors:  Joseph C Griffis; Nicholas V Metcalf; Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.