Johannes Töger1,2, Sebastian Bidhult1,3, Johan Revstedt4, Marcus Carlsson1, Håkan Arheden1, Einar Heiberg1,2,3. 1. Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 2. Department of Numerical Analysis, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 4. Department of Energy Sciences, Faculty of Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to: (i) present and characterize a phantom setup for validation of four-dimensional (4D) flow using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF); (ii) validate 4D flow velocity measurements using PIV; and (iii) validate 4D flow vortex ring volume (VV) using PLIF. METHODS: A pulsatile pump and a tank with a 25-mm nozzle were constructed. PIV measurements (1.5 × 1.5 mm pixels, temporal resolution 10 ms) were obtained on two occasions. The 4D flow (3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels, temporal resolution 50 ms) was acquired using SENSE = 2. VV was quantified using PLIF and 4D flow. RESULTS: PIV showed excellent day-to-day stability (R(2) = 0.99, bias -0.04 ± 0.72 cm/s). The 4D flow mean velocities agreed well with PIV (R(2) = 0.95, bias 0.16 ± 2.65 cm/s). Peak velocities in 4D flow were underestimated by 7-18% compared with PIV (y = 0.79x + 2.7, R(2) = 0.96, -12 ± 5%). VV showed excellent agreement between PLIF and 4D flow (R(2) = 0.99, 2.4 ± 1.5 mL). CONCLUSION: This study shows: (i) The proposed phantom enables reliable validation of 4D flow. (ii) 4D flow velocities show good agreement with PIV, but peak velocities were underestimated due to low spatial and temporal resolution. (iii) Vortex ring volume (VV) can be quantified using 4D flow.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to: (i) present and characterize a phantom setup for validation of four-dimensional (4D) flow using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF); (ii) validate 4D flow velocity measurements using PIV; and (iii) validate 4D flow vortex ring volume (VV) using PLIF. METHODS: A pulsatile pump and a tank with a 25-mm nozzle were constructed. PIV measurements (1.5 × 1.5 mm pixels, temporal resolution 10 ms) were obtained on two occasions. The 4D flow (3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels, temporal resolution 50 ms) was acquired using SENSE = 2. VV was quantified using PLIF and 4D flow. RESULTS: PIV showed excellent day-to-day stability (R(2) = 0.99, bias -0.04 ± 0.72 cm/s). The 4D flow mean velocities agreed well with PIV (R(2) = 0.95, bias 0.16 ± 2.65 cm/s). Peak velocities in 4D flow were underestimated by 7-18% compared with PIV (y = 0.79x + 2.7, R(2) = 0.96, -12 ± 5%). VV showed excellent agreement between PLIF and 4D flow (R(2) = 0.99, 2.4 ± 1.5 mL). CONCLUSION: This study shows: (i) The proposed phantom enables reliable validation of 4D flow. (ii) 4D flow velocities show good agreement with PIV, but peak velocities were underestimated due to low spatial and temporal resolution. (iii) Vortex ring volume (VV) can be quantified using 4D flow.
Authors: Philip A Corrado; Rafael Medero; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Oliver Wieben Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Mikael Kanski; Per M Arvidsson; Johannes Töger; Rasmus Borgquist; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-12-20 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Per M Arvidsson; Sándor J Kovács; Johannes Töger; Rasmus Borgquist; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Johannes Töger; Per M Arvidsson; Jelena Bock; Mikael Kanski; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sebastian Bidhult; Johannes Töger; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Anthony H Aletras; Erik Hedström Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sebastian Bidhult; Erik Hedström; Marcus Carlsson; Johannes Töger; Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg; Håkan Arheden; Anthony H Aletras; Einar Heiberg Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 2.273