Literature DB >> 25940239

Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.

Johannes Töger1,2, Sebastian Bidhult1,3, Johan Revstedt4, Marcus Carlsson1, Håkan Arheden1, Einar Heiberg1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to: (i) present and characterize a phantom setup for validation of four-dimensional (4D) flow using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF); (ii) validate 4D flow velocity measurements using PIV; and (iii) validate 4D flow vortex ring volume (VV) using PLIF.
METHODS: A pulsatile pump and a tank with a 25-mm nozzle were constructed. PIV measurements (1.5 × 1.5 mm pixels, temporal resolution 10 ms) were obtained on two occasions. The 4D flow (3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels, temporal resolution 50 ms) was acquired using SENSE = 2. VV was quantified using PLIF and 4D flow.
RESULTS: PIV showed excellent day-to-day stability (R(2) = 0.99, bias -0.04 ± 0.72 cm/s). The 4D flow mean velocities agreed well with PIV (R(2) = 0.95, bias 0.16 ± 2.65 cm/s). Peak velocities in 4D flow were underestimated by 7-18% compared with PIV (y = 0.79x + 2.7, R(2) = 0.96, -12 ± 5%). VV showed excellent agreement between PLIF and 4D flow (R(2) = 0.99, 2.4 ± 1.5 mL).
CONCLUSION: This study shows: (i) The proposed phantom enables reliable validation of 4D flow. (ii) 4D flow velocities show good agreement with PIV, but peak velocities were underestimated due to low spatial and temporal resolution. (iii) Vortex ring volume (VV) can be quantified using 4D flow.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  4D flow; CMR; blood flow; particle imaging velocimetry; validation; vortex ring formation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940239     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  7 in total

1.  A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference.

Authors:  Philip A Corrado; Rafael Medero; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.737

2.  Left ventricular fluid kinetic energy time curves in heart failure from cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D flow data.

Authors:  Mikael Kanski; Per M Arvidsson; Johannes Töger; Rasmus Borgquist; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  Vortex ring behavior provides the epigenetic blueprint for the human heart.

Authors:  Per M Arvidsson; Sándor J Kovács; Johannes Töger; Rasmus Borgquist; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Decreased Diastolic Ventricular Kinetic Energy in Young Patients with Fontan Circulation Demonstrated by Four-Dimensional Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Pia Sjöberg; Einar Heiberg; Pär Wingren; Jens Ramgren Johansson; Torsten Malm; Håkan Arheden; Petru Liuba; Marcus Carlsson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Hemodynamic forces in the left and right ventricles of the human heart using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging: Phantom validation, reproducibility, sensitivity to respiratory gating and free analysis software.

Authors:  Johannes Töger; Per M Arvidsson; Jelena Bock; Mikael Kanski; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Independent validation of metric optimized gating for fetal cardiovascular phase-contrast flow imaging.

Authors:  Sebastian Bidhult; Johannes Töger; Einar Heiberg; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Anthony H Aletras; Erik Hedström
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  A new vessel segmentation algorithm for robust blood flow quantification from two-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Sebastian Bidhult; Erik Hedström; Marcus Carlsson; Johannes Töger; Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg; Håkan Arheden; Anthony H Aletras; Einar Heiberg
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.273

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.