Literature DB >> 12499870

Perceptual and response bias in visuospatial neglect due to frontal and parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.

Filippo Brighina1, Edoardo Bisiach, Aurelio Piazza, Massimiliano Oliveri, Vincenzo La Bua, Ornella Daniele, Brigida Fierro.   

Abstract

Recently some authors have challenged the conventional association of directional motor neglect with damage of frontal structures, showing that pure sensory perceptual neglect (classically associated with parietal lesion) can follow damage of right frontal cortex. The aim of the present study was to assess the type of defect in visuo-spatial attention consequent upon a virtual frontal or parietal lesion induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects. To this purpose eleven subjects performed a visuo-spatial task requiring judgement about the length of the two segments of asymmetrically bisected horizontal lines, presented for 50 ms on a computer monitor. After each visual stimulus, subjects made a binary forced choice decision according to two different response conditions: A and B. In condition A, they had to name (right or left) the longer segment and in B the shorter segment of the line. The task was given in baseline condition and during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Trains of 10 stimuli at 25 Hz of frequency were applied over right frontal premotor and right posterior parietal areas, synchronously with visual stimuli. Parietal and frontal magnetic stimulation gave rise to significant perceptual bias as compared to baseline performance (i.e. subjects made opposite errors in the two response conditions). No significant response bias (i.e. the tendency to name the same side of the line in the two response conditions) was induced by magnetic stimulation on parietal and frontal sites. The present study highlights both the relevant contribution of frontal cortex in the determinism of neglect and the predominant role of sensory perceptual factors in parietal and frontal neglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12499870     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200212200-00038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  13 in total

1.  Modulation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits for visual awareness in the human right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Sara Torriero; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Right hemispatial neglect: frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Jonathan T Kleinman; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Is neuroenhancement by noninvasive brain stimulation a net zero-sum proposition?

Authors:  Anna-Katharine Brem; Peter J Fried; Jared C Horvath; Edwin M Robertson; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The role of the left posterior parietal lobule in top-down modulation on space-based attention: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; Lin Chen; Ke Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Adaptation to leftward-shifting prisms enhances local processing in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Scott A Reed; Paul Dassonville
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Intraparietal regions play a material general role in working memory: Evidence supporting an internal attentional role.

Authors:  Kyle Killebrew; Ryan Mruczek; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Shifting attentional priorities: control of spatial attention through hemispheric competition.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  What have We Learned from "Perturbing" the Human Cortical Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Tomáš Paus
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Imaging the neural mechanisms of TMS neglect-like bias in healthy volunteers with the interleaved TMS/fMRI technique: preliminary evidence.

Authors:  Raffaella Ricci; Adriana Salatino; Xingbao Li; Agnes P Funk; Sarah L Logan; Qiwen Mu; Kevin A Johnson; Daryl E Bohning; Mark S George
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.