Literature DB >> 25939596

Somatic and gastrointestinal in vivo biotransformation rates of hydrophobic chemicals in fish.

Justin C Lo1, David A Campbell2, Christopher J Kennedy1, Frank A P C Gobas3.   

Abstract

To improve current bioaccumulation assessment methods, a methodology is developed, applied, and investigated for measuring in vivo biotransformation rates of hydrophobic organic substances in the body (soma) and gastrointestinal tract of the fish. The method resembles the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 305 dietary bioaccumulation test but includes reference chemicals to determine both somatic and gastrointestinal biotransformation rates of test chemicals. Somatic biotransformation rate constants for the test chemicals ranged between 0 d(-1) and 0.38 (standard error [SE] 0.03)/d(-1) . Gastrointestinal biotransformation rate constants varied from 0 d(-1) to 46 (SE 7) d(-1) . Gastrointestinal biotransformation contributed more to the overall biotransformation in fish than somatic biotransformation for all test substances but 1. Results suggest that biomagnification tests can reveal the full extent of biotransformation in fish. The common presumption that the liver is the main site of biotransformation may not apply to many substances exposed through the diet. The results suggest that the application of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for somatic biotransformation rates and hepatic in vitro models to assess the effect of biotransformation on bioaccumulation can underestimate biotransformation rates and overestimate the biomagnification potential of chemicals that are biotransformed in the gastrointestinal tract. With some modifications, the OECD 305 test can generate somatic and gastrointestinal biotransformation data to develop biotransformation QSARs and test in vitro-in vivo biotransformation extrapolation methods.
© 2015 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioaccumulation; Biotransformation; Hydrophobic chemicals; In vivo

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25939596     DOI: 10.1002/etc.3050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  6 in total

1.  Concentration dependence of in vitro biotransformation rates of hydrophobic organic sunscreen agents in rainbow trout S9 fractions: Implications for bioaccumulation assessment.

Authors:  Leslie J Saunders; Simon Fontanay; John W Nichols; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Assessing the bioaccumulation potential of ionizable organic compounds: Current knowledge and research priorities.

Authors:  James M Armitage; Russell J Erickson; Till Luckenbach; Carla A Ng; Ryan S Prosser; Jon A Arnot; Kristin Schirmer; John W Nichols
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic and gastrointestinal biotransformation rates of hydrophobic chemicals in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Leslie J Saunders; Patrick N Fitzsimmons; John W Nichols; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Assimilation efficiency of sediment-bound PCBs ingested by fish impacted by strong sorption.

Authors:  Hilda Fadaei; Ernest Williams; Allen R Place; John P Connolly; Upal Ghosh
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Dietary Bioaccumulation and Biotransformation of Hydrophobic Organic Sunscreen Agents in Rainbow Trout.

Authors:  Leslie J Saunders; Alex D Hoffman; John W Nichols; Frank A P C Gobas
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 4.218

6.  Growth-Correcting the Bioconcentration Factor and Biomagnification Factor in Bioaccumulation Assessments.

Authors:  Frank A P C Gobas; Yung-Shan Lee
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.