Literature DB >> 24856481

Biochemical recurrence rates are similar for pT2-positive surgical margins and pT3a.

Katia R M Leite1, Carolina Hartmann2, Sabrina T Reis3, Nayara Viana3, Marcos F Dall'Oglio3, Alexandre C Sant'Anna3, Adriano Nesrallah3, Luciano Nesrallah1, Alberto A Antunes3, Luiz H Camara-Lopes2, Miguel Srougi3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Histological details of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens have been related to outcome after surgery in rare studies recently published. Our objective is to assess whether the status of surgical margins, the extent and the Gleason score of positive margins, and the extent of the extraprostatic extension are predictive of biochemical recurrence post-radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred sixty-five radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed. The length of the positive surgical margin and extraprostatic extension and the Gleason score of the margin were recorded. Statistical analyses examined the predictive value of these variables for biochemical recurrence.
RESULTS: 236 patients were stage pT2R0, 58 pT2R1, 25 pT3R0 and 46 pT3R1. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 11%, 31%, 20% and 45.7% of pT2R0, pT2R1, pT3R0 and pT3R1, respectively. The extent of the positive surgical margins and the Gleason score of the positive surgical margins were not associated with biochemical recurrence in univariate analysis in a mean follow up period of 35.9 months. In multivariate analyses, only the status of the surgical margins and the global Gleason score were associated with biochemical recurrence, with a risk of recurrence of 3.1 for positive surgical margins and of 3.8 for a Gleason score > 7.
CONCLUSION: Positive surgical margin and the global Gleason score are significant risk factors for biochemical recurrence post-radical prostatectomy, regardless of the extent of the surgical margin, the extent of the extraprostatic extension, or the local Gleason score of the positive surgical margin or extraprostatic tissue. pT2R1 disease behaves as pT3R0 and should be treated similarly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24856481     DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.02.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  3 in total

1.  Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?

Authors:  Caroline Pettenati; Yann Neuzillet; Camelia Radulescu; Jean-Marie Hervé; Vincent Molinié; Thierry Lebret
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ismail Evren; Ahmet Hacıislamoğlu; Mithat Ekşi; Abdullah Hizir Yavuzsan; Firat Baytekin; Yunus Çolakoğlu; Didem Canoğlu; Volkan Tugcu
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Biochemical recurrence of pathological T2+ localized prostate cancer after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A 10-year surveillance.

Authors:  Che Hseuh Yang; Yi Sheng Lin; Yen Chuan Ou; Wei Chun Weng; Li Hua Huang; Chin Heng Lu; Chao Yu Hsu; Min Che Tung
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.