| Literature DB >> 25937956 |
Shweta Kumari1, Akhilesh Kumar Verma1, Sumit Rungta2, Rahul Mitra3, Ragini Srivastava1, Narender Kumar1.
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with increased oxidative stress and serum prolidase activity (SPA) in many diseases. We aimed to observe SPA and oxidative stress in nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) infected with and without H. pylori among eastern Indians. 106 patients with H. pylori positive NUD, 82 patients with H. pylori negative NUD, and 50 healthy individuals were selected. SPA, total antioxidant capacity (TAOC), and total oxidant status (TOS) were measured with the use of spectrophotometer and an automated measurement method. SPA, TOS, and oxidative stress index (OSI) were significantly higher in patients with H. pylori positive than H. pylori negative NUD and healthy individuals (all P < 0.0001), whereas TAOC was significantly lower (P < 0.0001). Nonsignificant, increased SPA (P value = 0.6083) and decreased TAOC (P value = 0.1186) were observed in patients with H. pylori negative NUD than healthy individuals, while increased TOS and OSI were significant (P < 0.0001). Weak, nonsignificant correlations were observed between serum prolidase activity and TAOC, TOS, and OSI in H. pylori positive cases. Thus, increased SPA along with increased oxidative stress was observed, which seem to be closely associated with H. pylori infection. SPA and oxidative stress seem to be used as biomarkers for H. pylori infection in NUD.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 25937956 PMCID: PMC4392986 DOI: 10.1155/2013/182601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Biochem ISSN: 2090-7729
Histopathological examination of gastritis in cases, control-1, and control-2 (chronic inflammation and intensity of neutrophilic infiltration); for this scoring standard upgraded Sydney criteria were used [28]. No—numbers, %—percent.
| Grading | Chronic inflammation | Intensity of neutrophilic infiltration | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| For cases | For control-1 | For control-2 | For cases | For control-1 | For control-2 | |||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
| Grade 0 | 18 | 17.0 | 82 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 20 | 18.9 | 82 | 100 | 50 | 100 |
| Grade 1 (mild) | 32 | 30.2 | Nil | Zero | Nil | Zero | 30 | 28.2 | Nil | Zero | Nil | Zero |
| Grade 2 (moderate) | 34 | 32.0 | Nil | Zero | Nil | Zero | 36 | 34.0 | Nil | Zero | Nil | Zero |
| Grade 3 (severe) | 22 | 20.8 | Nil | Zero | Nil | Zero | 20 | 18.9 | Nil | Zero | Nil | Zero |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Total | 106 | 100 | 82 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 106 | 100 | 82 | 100 | 50 | 100 |
Representation of serum prolidase activity, total antioxidant capacity, total oxidant status, and oxidative stress index in the cases, control-1, and control-2. Data is represented as mean ± standard deviation with their respective units. P-value of less than 0.05 showed significant changes. Cases have significantly more increased serum prolidase activity, total oxidant status, and oxidative stress index than control-1 and control-2, while total anti-oxidant capacity significantly decreased.
| Subjects/statistical parameters | Number of subjects/condition | Serum prolidase activity (mmol min−1 L−1, | Total antioxidant capacity (mmol Trolox Eq/L, mean ± SD) | Total oxidant status ( | Oxidative stress index (arbitrary unit, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | 106 | 37.91 ± 3.19 | 1.39 ± 0.36 | 13.29 ± 1.29 | 10.25 ± 3.12 |
| Control-1 | 82 | 32.19 ± 3.43 | 1.79 ± 0.37 | 11.57 ± 1.06 | 6.71 ± 1.47 |
| Control-2 | 50 | 31.92 ± 3.10 | 1.88 ± 0.21 | 10.65 ± 0.21 | 5.72 ± 0.56 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 238 | — | — | — | — |
|
| |||||
|
| Cases versus control-1 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 |
| Cases versus control-2 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | |
| Control-1 versus control-2 | Equal to 0.6083 | Equal to 0.1186 | ≤0.0001 | ≤0.0001 | |
Representation of correlation of serum prolidase activity and TAOC, TOS, and OSI for the cases, control-1, and control-2. Correlation coefficients of ≤0.01 are considered as significant correlation. Negative sign for correlation coefficients indicated that serum prolidase activity increased with decrease in TAOC in cases, control-1, and control-2, while positive values indicated that serum prolidase activity increased with increase in TOS and OSI in respective cases, control-1, and control-2. In our above correlation study, all correlations have non-significant values.
| Statistics/correlative | Serum prolidase activity versus TAOC | Serum prolidase activity versus TOS | Serum prolidase activity versus OSI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Control-1 | Control-2 | Cases | Control-1 | Control-2 | Cases | Control-1 | Control-2 | |
| Pearson correlation coefficients | |||||||||
| Coefficients, | −0.131 | −0.013 | −0.170 | 0.029 | 0.093 | 0.029 | 0.107 | 0.087 | 0.152 |
| Sig. (two-tailed), | 0.181 | 0.907 | 0.238 | 0.770 | 0.407 | 0.840 | 0.277 | 0.437 | 0.292 |