David A Turner1, Geoffrey M Fleming2, Margaret Winkler3, K Jane Lee4, Melinda F Hamilton5, Christoph P Hornik6, Toni Petrillo-Albarano7, Katherine Mason8, Richard Mink9. 1. Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Duke Children's Hospital, Durham, NC. Electronic address: David.turner@duke.edu. 2. Pediatric Critical Care, Monroe Carroll Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn. 3. Pediatric Critical Care, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Ala. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Critical Care, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis. 5. Pediatric Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa. 6. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC. 7. Pediatric Critical Care, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 8. Pediatric Critical Care, Rainbow Babies and Children, Cleveland, Ohio. 9. Pediatric Critical Care, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute, Torrance, Calif.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Communication and professionalism are often challenging to teach, and the impact of the use of a given approach is not known. We undertook this investigation to establish pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) trainee perception of education in professionalism and communication and to compare their responses from those obtained from PCCM fellowship program directors. METHODS: The Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (E.P.I.C.) Investigators used the modified Delphi technique to develop a survey examining teaching of professionalism and communication. After piloting, the survey was sent to all 283 PCCM fellows in training in the United States. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 47% (133 of 283). Despite high rates of teaching overall, deficiencies were noted in all areas of communication and professionalism assessed. The largest areas of deficiency included not being specifically taught how to communicate: as a member of a nonclinical group (reported in 24%), across a broad range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds (19%) or how to provide consultation outside of the intensive care unit (17%). Only 50% of fellows rated education in communication as "very good/excellent." However, most felt confident in their communication abilities. For professionalism, fellows reported not being taught accountability (12%), how to conduct a peer review (12%), and how to handle potential conflict between personal beliefs, circumstances, and professional values (10%). Fifty-seven percent of fellows felt that their professionalism education was "very good/excellent," but nearly all expressed confidence in these skills. Compared with program directors, fellows reported more deficiencies in both communication and professionalism. CONCLUSIONS: There are numerous components of communication and professionalism that PCCM fellows perceive as not being specifically taught. Despite these deficiencies, fellow confidence remains high. Substantial opportunities exist to improve teaching in these areas.
OBJECTIVE: Communication and professionalism are often challenging to teach, and the impact of the use of a given approach is not known. We undertook this investigation to establish pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) trainee perception of education in professionalism and communication and to compare their responses from those obtained from PCCM fellowship program directors. METHODS: The Education in Pediatric Intensive Care (E.P.I.C.) Investigators used the modified Delphi technique to develop a survey examining teaching of professionalism and communication. After piloting, the survey was sent to all 283 PCCM fellows in training in the United States. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 47% (133 of 283). Despite high rates of teaching overall, deficiencies were noted in all areas of communication and professionalism assessed. The largest areas of deficiency included not being specifically taught how to communicate: as a member of a nonclinical group (reported in 24%), across a broad range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds (19%) or how to provide consultation outside of the intensive care unit (17%). Only 50% of fellows rated education in communication as "very good/excellent." However, most felt confident in their communication abilities. For professionalism, fellows reported not being taught accountability (12%), how to conduct a peer review (12%), and how to handle potential conflict between personal beliefs, circumstances, and professional values (10%). Fifty-seven percent of fellows felt that their professionalism education was "very good/excellent," but nearly all expressed confidence in these skills. Compared with program directors, fellows reported more deficiencies in both communication and professionalism. CONCLUSIONS: There are numerous components of communication and professionalism that PCCM fellows perceive as not being specifically taught. Despite these deficiencies, fellow confidence remains high. Substantial opportunities exist to improve teaching in these areas.
Authors: Kimberly Ephgrave; R Brent Stansfield; Jerold Woodhead; W John Sharp; Thomas George; John Lawrence Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Erin M Johnson; Melinda F Hamilton; R Scott Watson; Rene Claxton; Michael Barnett; Ann E Thompson; Robert Arnold Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Alisa Khan; Stephannie L Furtak; Patrice Melvin; Jayne E Rogers; Mark A Schuster; Christopher P Landrigan Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2017-08-02
Authors: Michael P Mendez; Harin Patel; Jordan Talan; Michelle Doering; Jared Chiarchiaro; Rebecca M Sternschein; Trevor C Steinbach; Jacqueline O'Toole; Abdulghani Sankari; Jennifer W McCallister; May M Lee; W Graham Carlos; Patrick G Lyons Journal: ATS Sch Date: 2020-07-14