Juliane Schelhorn1, Jan Best2, Marcus P Reinboldt3, Guido Gerken2, Marcus Ruhlmann4, Thomas C Lauenstein3, Gerald Antoch5, Sonja Kinner3. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany. Electronic address: Juliane.Schelhorn@uk-essen.de. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany. 4. Department of Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, Essen 45147, Germany. 5. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (G.A.), Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the utility of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), a liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent, versus gadobutrol for treatment response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 patients with HCC undergoing radioembolization. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and MR imaging with gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA on 2 consecutive days before radioembolization and 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 270 days after radioembolization. The standard of reference indicating tumor progression was CT combined with either α-fetoprotein or γ-glutamyltransferase. Gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging without late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-), and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA+) were evaluated by 2 radiologists in consensus using a 4-point scale: 1 = definitely no tumor progression; 2 = probably no tumor progression; 3 = probably tumor progression; 4 = definitely tumor progression. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Tumor progression was detected in 14 of 82 study visits according to the reference standard. Pairwise comparison of the area under the curve showed a tendency toward a larger area under the curve for Gd-EOB-DTPA+ compared with gadobutrol (P = .056). Sensitivity and specificity were higher in Gd-EOB-DTPA+ (0.929 and 0.971) than in Gd-EOB-DTPA- (0.786 and 0.941) or gadobutrol (0.643 and 0.956). In 2 cases, tumor progression was detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA+ and by an increase in α-fetoprotein, but not by CT, gadobutrol, or Gd-EOB-DTPA-. CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA+ MR imaging was not inferior to gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging in therapy response evaluation after radioembolization and may allow a more accurate detection of early HCC recurrence in single cases.
PURPOSE: To compare the utility of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA), a liver-specific magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent, versus gadobutrol for treatment response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 patients with HCC undergoing radioembolization. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and MR imaging with gadobutrol and Gd-EOB-DTPA on 2 consecutive days before radioembolization and 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, and 270 days after radioembolization. The standard of reference indicating tumor progression was CT combined with either α-fetoprotein or γ-glutamyltransferase. Gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging without late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-), and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging with late phase imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA+) were evaluated by 2 radiologists in consensus using a 4-point scale: 1 = definitely no tumor progression; 2 = probably no tumor progression; 3 = probably tumor progression; 4 = definitely tumor progression. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS:Tumor progression was detected in 14 of 82 study visits according to the reference standard. Pairwise comparison of the area under the curve showed a tendency toward a larger area under the curve for Gd-EOB-DTPA+ compared with gadobutrol (P = .056). Sensitivity and specificity were higher in Gd-EOB-DTPA+ (0.929 and 0.971) than in Gd-EOB-DTPA- (0.786 and 0.941) or gadobutrol (0.643 and 0.956). In 2 cases, tumor progression was detected by Gd-EOB-DTPA+ and by an increase in α-fetoprotein, but not by CT, gadobutrol, or Gd-EOB-DTPA-. CONCLUSIONS:Gd-EOB-DTPA+ MR imaging was not inferior to gadobutrol-enhanced MR imaging in therapy response evaluation after radioembolization and may allow a more accurate detection of early HCC recurrence in single cases.
Authors: Anum Aslam; Amita Kamath; Bradley Spieler; Mark Maschiocchi; Carl F Sabottke; Victoria Chernyak; Sara C Lewis Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-04-15