Literature DB >> 33856509

Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents.

Anum Aslam1, Amita Kamath2, Bradley Spieler3, Mark Maschiocchi4, Carl F Sabottke5, Victoria Chernyak6, Sara C Lewis7.   

Abstract

Cross-sectional imaging with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to assess tumor response to locoregional therapy (LRT). Current response assessment algorithms, such as the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA), allow assessment using conventional gadolinium-based extracellular contrast agents (ECA) for accurate tumor response assessment following LRT. MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA) allows an acquisition of hepatobiliary phase (HBP), which is proven to increase sensitivity for detection of observations in at-risk patients, particularly for findings < 2 cm. The use of HBA is not yet incorporated into the TRA; however, it is increasingly used in clinical practice. Few published studies have evaluated the performance of LI-RADS TRA by applying ancillary features related to HBP that has resulted in category adjustment, enabling more sensitive and unequivocal diagnosis. This may help timely management of viable cases, without a significant loss of specificity in comparison with the ECA-based LI-RADS TRA assessment. In this review, we will describe and compare the imaging appearance of treated HCC on MRI using extracellular and hepatobiliary contrast agents and discuss emerging evidence and pitfalls in the assessment of tumor response following LRT with HBA.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracellular contrast agent; Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Locoregional treatment response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33856509     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03076-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  70 in total

1.  Downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

Authors:  T Clark Gamblin; David A Geller
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 2.  Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Byrne; Jorge Rakela
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 3.  Hepatocyte-specific contrast media: not so simple.

Authors:  Andrew T Trout; Alexander J Towbin; Ethan A Smith; Anita Gupta; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

4.  The role of imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma: the present and future.

Authors:  Amir H Davarpanah; Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Jorge A Marrero; Laura M Kulik; Claude B Sirlin; Andrew X Zhu; Richard S Finn; Michael M Abecassis; Lewis R Roberts; Julie K Heimbach
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree.

Authors:  Melanie K Seale; Onofrio A Catalano; Sanjay Saini; Peter F Hahn; Dushyant V Sahani
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  Bridging locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jason T Heckman; Michael B Devera; J Wallis Marsh; Paulo Fontes; Nikhil B Amesur; Shane E Holloway; Michael Nalesnik; David A Geller; Jennifer L Steel; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  The role of interventional radiology in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  N Molla; N AlMenieir; E Simoneau; M Aljiffry; D Valenti; P Metrakos; L M Boucher; M Hassanain
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Consensus report from the 8th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Thomas Berg; Hersh Chandarana; Gar-Yang Chau; Luigi Grazioli; Myeong-Jin Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Elmar M Merkle; Takamichi Murakami; Jens Ricke; Claude B Sirlin; Bin Song; Bachir Taouli; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment.

Authors:  Marco Gatti; Cesare Maino; Fatemeh Darvizeh; Alessandro Serafini; Eleonora Tricarico; Alessia Guarneri; Riccardo Inchingolo; Davide Ippolito; Umberto Ricardi; Paolo Fonio; Riccardo Faletti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.