Literature DB >> 25937155

Single incision transumbilical laparoscopic varicocelectomy versus the conventional laparoscopic technique: A randomized clinical study.

Tamer Youssef1, Emad Abdalla2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Varicocele is the most common correctable cause of infertility. We analyzed the outcomes of single incision laparoscopic varicocelectomy (SIL-V) in comparison with conventional transperitoneal varicocelectomy (CTL-V).
METHODS: Patients with clinically palpable varicocele treated by laparoscopic varicocelectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: SIL-V and CTL-V group. The primary outcome measures were improvement in semen parameters and resolution of testicular pain. Secondary outcome measures included operating time, postoperative pain scores, time to return to normal activity, patient satisfaction and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Eighty patients completed the study. No vascular or intestinal complications occurred during both procedures. All patients were discharged 24 h postoperatively. The parameters measuring the success of varicocelectomy had improved for the majority of patients with no significant difference between the two groups. There was significantly longer operating time in SIL-V group (44.6 ± 5.4 min) than in CTL-V group (41.3 ± 8.5 min) (P = 0.03). The difference in operating time was lost when bilateral procedures were compared (P = 0.21). The mean VAS scores for pain at 3, 24 and 48 h postoperatively were significantly lower in SIL-V group (P = 0.02, P = 0.03 and P < 0.001 respectively). Time to return to normal activity was significantly shorter in SIL-V (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in SIL-V group (P < 0.01). Postoperative complications were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: SIL-V is a safe and effective straightforward alternative to the well-established and accepted CTL-V. The tendency toward decreased postoperative pain, rapid return to normal activity and the high patients' satisfaction rate regarding cosmetic results are potential benefits of SIL-V procedure. CLINICAL TRIAL: (NCT02335385).
Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infertility; Single incision laparoscopic varicocelectomy; Varicocele; Varicocelectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25937155     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  10 in total

1.  Subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation of spermatic vessels (SEAL-SV) using an epidural-&-spinal needle: a novel technique to repair adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Furan Wang; Yi Chen; Junfeng Zhao; Hongji Zhong; Yan Li; Zhan Shi
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Incidence of incisional hernias following single-incision versus traditional laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M B Connell; R Selvam; S V Patel
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Outcome of Gynecologic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery with a Homemade Device and Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments in a Chinese Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Xianghui Su; Xiaolong Jin; Canliang Wen; Qiong Xu; Chunfang Cai; Zhuohui Zhong; Xiang Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.

Authors:  Emma Persad; Clare Aa O'Loughlin; Simi Kaur; Gernot Wagner; Nina Matyas; Melanie Rosalia Hassler-Di Fratta; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-23

5.  Laparoscopic entry techniques.

Authors:  Gaity Ahmad; Jade Baker; John Finnerty; Kevin Phillips; Andrew Watson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

6.  Modified Inguinal Microscope-Assisted Varicocelectomy under Local Anesthesia: A Non-randomised Controlled Study of 3565 Cases.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Qian Liu; Xun Wang; Rijian Guan; Sen Li; Youpeng Zhang; Yongbiao Cheng; Hanqing Zeng; Yong Tang; Zhaohui Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Outcome reporting across randomized controlled trials evaluating potential treatments for male infertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael P Rimmer; Ruth A Howie; Venkatesh Subramanian; Richard A Anderson; Ricardo Pimenta Bertolla; Yusuf Beebeejaun; Pietro Bortoletto; Sesh K Sunkara; Rod T Mitchell; Allan Pacey; Madelon van Wely; Cindy M Farquhar; James M N Duffy; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-03-04

Review 8.  The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery.

Authors:  Joel L Marmar
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 9.  Laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Xi Duan; Xuesong Yang; Xianzhong Deng; Shu Cui
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-05

Review 10.  Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Zhang; Shu-Juan Zheng; Wen Yu; You-Feng Han; Hai Chen; Yun Chen; Yu-Tian Dai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.