Literature DB >> 25937134

Evidence for differential modulation of primary and nonprimary auditory cortex by forward masking in tinnitus.

Larry E Roberts1, Daniel J Bosnyak2, Ian C Bruce3, Phillip E Gander4, Brandon T Paul5.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that tinnitus is generated by aberrant neural activity that develops among neurons in tonotopic of regions of primary auditory cortex (A1) affected by hearing loss, which is also the frequency region where tinnitus percepts localize (Eggermont and Roberts 2004; Roberts et al., 2010, 2013). These models suggest (1) that differences between tinnitus and control groups of similar age and audiometric function should depend on whether A1 is probed in tinnitus frequency region (TFR) or below it, and (2) that brain responses evoked from A1 should track changes in the tinnitus percept when residual inhibition (RI) is induced by forward masking. We tested these predictions by measuring (128-channel EEG) the sound-evoked 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) known to localize tonotopically to neural sources in A1. For comparison the N1 transient response localizing to distributed neural sources in nonprimary cortex (A2) was also studied. When tested under baseline conditions where tinnitus subjects would have heard their tinnitus, ASSR responses were larger in a tinnitus group than in controls when evoked by 500 Hz probes while the reverse was true for tinnitus and control groups tested with 5 kHz probes, confirming frequency-dependent group differences in this measure. On subsequent trials where RI was induced by masking (narrow band noise centered at 5 kHz), ASSR amplitude increased in the tinnitus group probed at 5 kHz but not in the tinnitus group probed at 500 Hz. When collapsed into a single sample tinnitus subjects reporting comparatively greater RI depth and duration showed comparatively larger ASSR increases after masking regardless of probe frequency. Effects of masking on ASSR amplitude in the control groups were completely reversed from those in the tinnitus groups, with no change seen to 5 kHz probes but ASSR increases to 500 Hz probes even though the masking sound contained no energy at 500 Hz (an "off-frequency" masking effect). In contrast to these findings for the ASSR, N1 amplitude was larger in tinnitus than control groups at both probe frequencies under baseline conditions, decreased after masking in all conditions, and did not relate to RI. These results suggest that aberrant neural activity occurring in the TFR of A1 underlies tinnitus and its modulation during RI. They indicate further that while neural changes occur in A2 in tinnitus, these changes do not reflect the tinnitus percept. Models for tinnitus and forward masking are described that integrate these findings within a common framework.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25937134     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Long-Lasting forward Suppression of Spontaneous Firing in Auditory Neurons: Implication to the Residual Inhibition of Tinnitus.

Authors:  A V Galazyuk; S V Voytenko; R J Longenecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 2.  Neural plasticity and its initiating conditions in tinnitus.

Authors:  L E Roberts
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Maladaptive plasticity in tinnitus--triggers, mechanisms and treatment.

Authors:  Susan E Shore; Larry E Roberts; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses.

Authors:  Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Broadened population-level frequency tuning in the auditory cortex of tinnitus patients.

Authors:  Kenichi Sekiya; Mariko Takahashi; Shingo Murakami; Ryusuke Kakigi; Hidehiko Okamoto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Impairments of Speech Comprehension in Patients with Tinnitus-A Review.

Authors:  Daniela Ivansic; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Boris Müller; Gerd F Volk; Gerlind Schneider; Christian Dobel
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.750

7.  Estimating multiple latencies in the auditory system from auditory steady-state responses on a single EEG channel.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Elisabeth Noordanus; A John van Opstal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Susceptibility to Residual Inhibition Is Associated With Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Chronicity.

Authors:  S Hu; L Anschuetz; D A Hall; M Caversaccio; W Wimmer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Cortical Activation Patterns of Different Masking Noises and Correlation With Their Masking Efficacy, Determined by Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Qiyang Sun; Xianren Wang; Bixue Huang; JinCangjian Sun; Jiahui Li; Huiwen Zhuang; Guanxia Xiong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.