Literature DB >> 25936739

Multifactorial intervention in diabetes care using real-time monitoring and tailored feedback in type 2 diabetes.

Soo Lim1,2, Seon Mee Kang1,2, Kyoung Min Kim1,2, Jae Hoon Moon1,2, Sung Hee Choi1,2, Hee Hwang1,2, Hye Seung Jung3, Kyong Soo Park3, Jun Oh Ryu4, Hak Chul Jang5,6.   

Abstract

AIMS: In 2011, we demonstrated that an individualized health management system employing advanced medical information technology, designated ubiquitous (u)-healthcare, was helpful in achieving glycemic control without hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes. Following this, we generated a new multidisciplinary u-healthcare system by upgrading our clinical decision support system (CDSS) rule engine and integrating a physical activity-monitoring device and dietary feedback into a comprehensive package.
METHODS: In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, patients with type 2 diabetes aged over 60 years were assigned randomly to a self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) group (N = 50) or u-healthcare group (N = 50) for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7 % without hypoglycemia. Changes in body composition and lipid profiles were also investigated. The u-healthcare group was educated to use a specially designed glucometer and an activity monitor that automatically transferred test results to a hospital-based server. An automated CDSS rule engine generated and sent patient-specific messages about glucose, diet, and physical activity to their mobile phones and a Web site.
RESULTS: After 6 months of follow-up, the HbA1c level was significantly decreased in the u-healthcare group [8.0 ± 0.7 % (64.2 ± 8.8 mmol/mol) to 7.3 ± 0.9 % (56.7 ± 9.9 mmol/mol)] compared with the SMBG group [8.1 ± 0.8 % (64.9 ± 9.1 mmol/mol) to 7.9 ± 1.2 % (63.2 ± 12.3 mmol/mol)] (P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with HbA1c < 7 % without hypoglycemia was greater in the u-healthcare group (26 %) than in the SMBG group (12 %; P < 0.05). Body fat mass decreased and lipid profiles improved in the u-healthcare group but not in the SMBG group.
CONCLUSION: This u-healthcare service provided effective management for older patients with type 2 diabetes (ClinicalTrial.Gov: NCT01137058).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision support system; Telemedicine; Ubiquitous healthcare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25936739     DOI: 10.1007/s00592-015-0754-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Diabetol        ISSN: 0940-5429            Impact factor:   4.280


  35 in total

Review 1.  mHealth Interventions for Disadvantaged and Vulnerable People with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lindsay Satterwhite Mayberry; Courtney R Lyles; Brian Oldenburg; Chandra Y Osborn; Makenzie Parks; Monica E Peek
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  mHealth Technology and CVD Risk Reduction.

Authors:  Maan Isabella Cajita; Yaguang Zheng; Jacob Kigo Kariuki; Karen M Vuckovic; Lora E Burke
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Use of self-monitoring tools in a clinic sample of adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Molly L Tanenbaum; Harikrashna B Bhatt; Valerie A Thomas; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Exploring app features with outcomes in mHealth studies involving chronic respiratory diseases, diabetes, and hypertension: a targeted exploration of the literature.

Authors:  Sara Belle Donevant; Robin Dawson Estrada; Joan Marie Culley; Brian Habing; Swann Arp Adams
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Primary Care Clinic Nurse Activities with a Telehealth Monitoring System.

Authors:  Chelsea Howland; Laurel Despins; Jeri Sindt; Bonnie Wakefield; David R Mehr
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 6.  Technology Interventions to Manage Food Intake: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Luke Gemming
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 7.  How can clinical practices pragmatically increase physical activity for patients with type 2 diabetes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Kelsey A Luoma; Ian M Leavitt; Joel C Marrs; Andrea L Nederveld; Judith G Regensteiner; Andrea L Dunn; Russell E Glasgow; Amy G Huebschmann
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Home Telemonitoring of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xu Zhu; Myia Williams; Kayla Finuf; Vidhi Patel; Liron Sinvani; Gisele Wolf-Klein; Allison Marziliano; Christian Nouryan; Amgad Makaryus; Roman Zeltser; Leanne Tortez; Tanya Shkolnikov; Alyson Myers; Renee Pekmezaris
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 9.  Effects of consumer-oriented health information technologies in diabetes management over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Da Tao; Tieyan Wang; Tieshan Wang; Shuang Liu; Xingda Qu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Effectiveness of a ketogenic diet and virtual coaching intervention for patients with diabetes: A difference-in-differences analysis.

Authors:  Kiersten L Strombotne; Jessica Lum; Nambi J Ndugga; Anne E Utech; Steven D Pizer; Austin B Frakt; Paul R Conlin
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.577

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.