Literature DB >> 25936606

The pros and cons of vertebrate animal models for functional and therapeutic research on inherited retinal dystrophies.

Ralph W N Slijkerman1, Fei Song2, Galuh D N Astuti3, Martijn A Huynen4, Erwin van Wijk5, Knut Stieger6, Rob W J Collin7.   

Abstract

Over the last decade, huge progress has been made in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD), as well as in the development and implementation of novel therapies, especially in the field of gene therapy. The use of mutant animal models, either naturally occurring or generated by genetic modification, have contributed greatly to our knowledge on IRD. Yet, these mutant animal models do not always mimic the retinal phenotype that is observed in humans with mutations in the orthologous gene, often due to species-specific characteristics of the retina, and/or diverse functions of the gene products in different species. In this manuscript, we compare general and ocular characteristics of a series of widely used vertebrate animal models, i.e. zebrafish, chicken, rodents, cats, dogs, sheep, pigs and monkeys, in terms of genetic architecture and sequence homology, methods to modify genomes, anatomy of the eye, and structural details of the retina. Furthermore, we present an overview of mutant vertebrate animal models that have been used to study or develop treatments for the various genetic subtypes of IRD, and correlate the suitability of these models to the specific characteristics of each animal. Herewith, we provide tools that will help to select the most suitable animal model for specific research questions on IRDs in the future, and thereby assist in an optimal use of animals and resources to further increase our understanding of inherited retinal dystrophies, and develop novel treatments for these disorders.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Gene therapy; Inherited retinal dystrophies; Photoreceptors; Retina

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25936606     DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res        ISSN: 1350-9462            Impact factor:   21.198


  28 in total

1.  Unraveling the mysteries of pre-mRNA splicing in the retina via stem cell technology.

Authors:  Rob W J Collin
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2016-11-04

Review 2.  The chick eye in vision research: An excellent model for the study of ocular disease.

Authors:  C Ellis Wisely; Javed A Sayed; Heather Tamez; Chris Zelinka; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Andy J Fischer; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  Modeling intraocular bacterial infections.

Authors:  Roger A Astley; Phillip S Coburn; Salai Madhumathi Parkunan; Michelle C Callegan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 4.  Restoring Vision to the Blind with Chemical Photoswitches.

Authors:  Ivan Tochitsky; Michael A Kienzler; Ehud Isacoff; Richard H Kramer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Generation of Humanized Zebrafish Models for the In Vivo Assessment of Antisense Oligonucleotide-Based Splice Modulation Therapies.

Authors:  Renske Schellens; Erik de Vrieze; Ralph Slijkerman; Hannie Kremer; Erwin van Wijk
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Usherin defects lead to early-onset retinal dysfunction in zebrafish.

Authors:  Margo Dona; Ralph Slijkerman; Kimberly Lerner; Sanne Broekman; Jeremy Wegner; Taylor Howat; Theo Peters; Lisette Hetterschijt; Nanda Boon; Erik de Vrieze; Nasrin Sorusch; Uwe Wolfrum; Hannie Kremer; Stephan Neuhauss; Jingjing Zang; Maarten Kamermans; Monte Westerfield; Jennifer Phillips; Erwin van Wijk
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 7.  Use of Zebrafish in Drug Discovery Toxicology.

Authors:  Steven Cassar; Isaac Adatto; Jennifer L Freeman; Joshua T Gamse; Iñaki Iturria; Christian Lawrence; Arantza Muriana; Randall T Peterson; Steven Van Cruchten; Leonard I Zon
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 3.739

8.  Optical control of endogenous receptors and cellular excitability using targeted covalent photoswitches.

Authors:  Mercè Izquierdo-Serra; Antoni Bautista-Barrufet; Ana Trapero; Aida Garrido-Charles; Ariadna Díaz-Tahoces; Nuria Camarero; Silvia Pittolo; Sergio Valbuena; Ariadna Pérez-Jiménez; Marina Gay; Alejandro García-Moll; Carles Rodríguez-Escrich; Juan Lerma; Pedro de la Villa; Eduardo Fernández; Miquel À Pericàs; Amadeu Llebaria; Pau Gorostiza
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Genetics, pathogenesis and therapeutic developments for Usher syndrome type 2.

Authors:  M Stemerdink; B García-Bohórquez; R Schellens; G Garcia-Garcia; E Van Wijk; J M Millan
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Cone photoreceptor reflectance variation in the northern tree shrew and thirteen-lined ground squirrel.

Authors:  Mina Gaffney; Robert F Cooper; Jenna A Cava; Hannah M Follett; Alexander E Salmon; Susan Freling; Ching T Yu; Dana K Merriman; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.