Literature DB >> 25936491

Unreliability of home blood pressure measurement and the effect of a patient-oriented intervention.

Jean-Philippe Milot1, Leora Birnbaum1, Pierre Larochelle1, Robert Wistaff1, Mikhael Laskine1, Paul Van Nguyen1, Maxime Lamarre-Cliche2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure (BP) measurement (HBPM) is recommended for the diagnosis and follow-up of high BP. It is unclear how this aspect of BP monitoring has evolved over the years and whether interventions could influence patient adherence to HBPM guidelines.
METHODS: After a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study performed in 2010, a passive, multimodal intervention, focused on improving adherence to HBPM guidelines, was implemented. A second study was conducted in 2014 to measure its effect.
RESULTS: In 2010 and 2014, 1010 and 1005 patients, respectively, completed the questionnaire. In 2010 and 2014, 82% and 84% of patients, respectively, self-measured their BP. Reporting of HBPM and adherence to recommended procedures was suboptimal. Only 34.0% of patients in 2010 and 31.7% in 2014 brought > 80% of their measurements to their doctor. Only 49.6% in 2010 and 52.9% in 2014 prepared > 80% of the time for HBPM. Only 48.1% in 2010 and 52.1% in 2014 rested for 5 minutes > 80% of the time before HBPM. Only 15% of patients in 2010 and 18% in 2014 were defined as sufficiently compliant with all HBPM procedures. Paired analysis of a subset of 535 patients who participated in the 2010 and 2014 studies showed no clinically significant differences in reliability between the 2 surveys.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to HBPM guidelines was suboptimal in 2010 and still is in 2014 despite a passive, multimodal intervention. Active training in HBPM procedures should be studied. Greater automation could improve HBPM reliability.
Copyright © 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25936491     DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  13 in total

1.  The impact of unrecorded readings on the precision and diagnostic performance of home blood pressure monitoring: a statistical study.

Authors:  Félix Rinfret; Franck Ouattara; Lyne Cloutier; Pierre Larochelle; Monica Ilinca; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Adherence Scale for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Yamin Wang; Kun Li; Huiqun Li; Wenbo Zhao; Yanru Chen; Hongli Shang; Min Zhang; Jing Zheng
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  The Accuracy in Measurement of Blood Pressure (AIM-BP) collaborative: Background and rationale.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Norm R C Campbell; Michael A Weber; Daniel Lackland; Daichi Shimbo; Xin-Hua Zhang; Aletta E Schutte; Michael Rakotz; Gregory Wozniak; Raymond Townsend; Richard McManus; Kei Asayama; Dean Picone; Jordy Cohen; Tammy Brady; Michael Hecht-Olsen; Christian Delles; Bruce Alpert; Richard Dart; Donald J DiPette; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  How to ensure personalized accuracy in home blood pressure devices: Should we play it by ear?

Authors:  Jennifer Ringrose; Raj Padwal
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  The elegance of simplicity.

Authors:  Jennifer Ringrose; Sangita Sridar
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Feasibility of a New Cuffless Device for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients With Hypertension: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Paula Am Ogink; Jelske M de Jong; Mats Koeneman; Mariska Weenk; Lucien Jlpg Engelen; Harry van Goor; Tom H van de Belt; Sebastian Jh Bredie
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Optimizing observer performance of clinic blood pressure measurement: a position statement from the Lancet Commission on Hypertension Group.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Norm R C Campbell; Aletta E Schutte; Michael Hecht Olsen; Christian Delles; Anthony Etyang; J Kennedy Cruickshank; George Stergiou; Michael K Rakotz; Gregory Wozniak; Marc G Jaffe; Ivor Benjamin; Gianfranco Parati; James E Sharman
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Scaling up the use of home blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension in low-income countries: A step towards curbing the burden of hypertension.

Authors:  Valirie Ndip Agbor; Mazou N Temgoua; Jean Jacques N Noubiap
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Telemonitoring and Protocolized Case Management for Hypertensive Community-Dwelling Seniors With Diabetes: Protocol of the TECHNOMED Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Raj Padwal; Finlay Aleck McAlister; Peter William Wood; Pierre Boulanger; Miriam Fradette; Scott Klarenbach; Alun L Edwards; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan; Doreen Rabi; Sumit Ranjan Majumdar
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-06-24

10.  Adherence to blood pressure measurement guidelines in long-term care facilities: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Sachiko Ozone; Mikiya Sato; Ayumi Takayashiki; Naoto Sakamoto; Hisashi Yoshimoto; Tetsuhiro Maeno
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2018-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.