| Literature DB >> 25935650 |
Jacob H Kristensen1,2, Morten A Karsdal3, Jannie Mb Sand4, Nicholas Willumsen5, Claudia Diefenbach6, Birte Svensson7, Per Hägglund8, Diana J Oersnes-Leeming9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During the pathological destruction of lung tissue, neutrophil elastase (NE) degrades elastin, one of the major constituents of lung parenchyma. However there are no non-invasive methods to quantify NE degradation of elastin. We selected specific elastin fragments generated by NE for antibody generation and developed an ELISA assay (EL-NE) for the quantification of NE-degraded elastin.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25935650 PMCID: PMC4426538 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-015-0048-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Figure 1Characterization and Specificity of the EL-NE Monoclonal Antibody. (A): Competitive ELISA showing inhibition of free peptide (GGPGFGPGVV), elongated peptide (GGPGFGPGVVG), nonsense peptide (VGAGVPGLGV) and nonsense screening peptide (Biotin-KK- VGAGVPGLGV). (B): EL-NE fragment levels after 48 hours in vitro incubation of intact human elastin separately in buffer (ELN), elastin incubated in the presence of NE, MMP-2, MMP-7, MMP-9 and MMP-12. NE incubated for 48 hours separately in buffer was added as control. Abbreviations: ELN, elastin; NE, Neutrophil elastase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase.
Figure 2Cross-Reactivity to Cathepsin. EL-NE fragment levels after 24 hours in vitro incubation of intact human elastin separately in buffer (ELN) and elastin incubated with CatG and NE. EL-NE levels in NE and CatG separately in buffer are also shown. Abbreviations: ELN, elastin; NE, Neutrophil elastase; CatG, Cathepsin G.
Technical validation of the EL-NE assay
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Detection range | 0.90 nM – 119 nM |
| Lower limit of quantification | 1.9 nM |
| Intra-assay variation | 7% |
| Inter-assay variation | 11% |
| Dilution range of serum samples | 1:2 (recommended) |
| Dilution range of plasma samples | 1:2 (recommended) |
| Dilution recovery in serum | 104% |
| Dilution recovery in plasma (Heparin) | 86% |
| Dilution recovery in plasma (Citrate) | 108% |
| Freeze-thaw recovery in serum | 96% |
| Freeze-thaw recovery in plasma (Heparin) | 87% |
| Freeze-thaw recovery in plasma (Citrate) | 104% |
| Analyte stability serum (24 h, 4°C/20°C) | 88%/77% |
| Analyte stability plasma (Heparin) (24 h, 4°C/20°C) | 95%/111% |
| Analyte stability plasma (Citrate) (24 h, 4°C/20°C) | 85%/77% |
Figure 3Degradation of Elastin in IPF and lung cancer. (A): EL-NE fragment levels in serum from patients with IPF (n = 10) compared with controls (n = 9). ** p < 0.01. (B): EL-NE fragment levels in serum from patients diagnosed with lung cancer (n = 40 in total), SCC (n = 16), adenocarcinoma (n = 16) and SCLC (n = 8) compared with controls (n = 12). **** p < 0.0001. Groups were compared by T-test with Welch correction. Data are shown as the geometric mean (95% CI). Abbreviations: IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma.