Literature DB >> 25935572

Health care justice and its implications for current policy of a mandatory waiting period for elective tubal sterilization.

Amirhossein Moaddab1, Laurence B McCullough2, Frank A Chervenak3, Karin A Fox1, Kjersti Marie Aagaard1, Bahram Salmanian1, Susan P Raine1, Alireza A Shamshirsaz1.   

Abstract

Tubal sterilization during the immediate postpartum period is 1 of the most common forms of contraception in the United States. This time of the procedure has the advantage of 1-time hospitalization, which results in ease and convenience for the woman. The US Collaborative Review of Sterilization Study indicates the high efficacy and effectiveness of postpartum tubal sterilization. Oral and written informed consent is the ethical and legal standard for the performance of elective tubal sterilization for permanent contraception for all patients, regardless of source of payment. Current health care policy and practice regarding elective tubal sterilization for Medicaid beneficiaries places a unique requirement on these patients and their obstetricians: a mandatory waiting period. This requirement originates in decades-old legislation, which we briefly describe. We then introduce the concept of health care justice in professional obstetric ethics and explain how it originates in the ethical concepts of medicine as a profession and of being a patient and its deontologic and consequentialist dimensions. We next identify the implications of health care justice for the current policy of a mandatory 30-day waiting period. We conclude that Medicaid policy allocates access to elective tubal sterilization differently, based on source of payment and gender, which violates health care justice in both its deontologic and consequentialist dimensions. Obstetricians should invoke health care justice in women's health care as the basis for advocacy for needed change in law and health policy, to eliminate health care injustice in women's access to elective tubal sterilization.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethics; health care justice; health policy; medicine as a profession; tubal sterilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25935572     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Desired Sterilization Procedure at the Time of Cesarean Delivery According to Insurance Status.

Authors:  Jane Morris; Mustafa Ascha; Barbara Wilkinson; Emily Verbus; Mary Montague; Brian M Mercer; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Update on permanent contraception options for women.

Authors:  Eva Patil; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  An updated assessment of postpartum sterilization fulfillment after vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Kristen K Wolfe; Machelle D Wilson; Melody Y Hou; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Perceptions and practice of state Medicaid officials regarding informed consent for female sterilization.

Authors:  Heather Bouma-Johnston; Roselle Ponsaran; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 5.  Recent developments have made female permanent contraception an increasingly attractive option, and pregnant women in particular ought to be counselled about it.

Authors:  Douwe A A Verkuyl
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-12-12

6.  Association between neighborhood disadvantage and fulfillment of desired postpartum sterilization.

Authors:  Kavita Shah Arora; Mustafa Ascha; Barbara Wilkinson; Emily Verbus; Mary Montague; Jane Morris; Douglas Einstadter
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.135

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.