Tal Iluz1, Aner Weiss1, Eran Gazit1, Ariel Tankus1,2, Marina Brozgol1, Moran Dorfman1, Anat Mirelman1, Nir Giladi1,3,4,5, Jeffrey M Hausdorff6,4,7. 1. Center for the Study of Movement, Department of Neurology, Cognition and Mobility and. 2. Functional Neurosurgery Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel. 3. Department of Neurology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine. 4. Sagol School of Neuroscience. 5. Sieratzki Chair in Neurology, Tel Aviv University, and. 6. Center for the Study of Movement, Department of Neurology, Cognition and Mobility and jhausdor@tlvmc.gov.il. 7. Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional performance-based tests like the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and its subtasks have been associated with fall risk, future disability, nursing home admission, and other poor outcomes in older adults. However, a single measurement in the laboratory may not fully reflect the subject's condition and everyday performance. To begin to validate an approach based on long-term, continuous monitoring, we investigated the sit-to-walk and walk-to-sit transitions performed spontaneously and naturally during daily living. METHODS: Thirty young adults, 38 older adults, and 33 elderly (idiopathic) fallers were studied. After evaluating mobility and functional performance in the laboratory, participants wore an accelerometer on their lower back for 3 days. We analyzed the sit-to-walk and walk-to-sit transitions using temporal and distribution-related features. Machine learning algorithms assessed the feature set's ability to discriminate between the different cohorts. RESULTS: 5,027 transitions were analyzed. Significant differences were observed between the young and older adults (p < .044) and between the fallers and older adults (p < .032). Machine learning algorithms classified the young and older adult with an accuracy of about 98% and the fallers and the older adults at 88%, which was better than the results achieved using traditional laboratory assessments (~72%). CONCLUSIONS: Features extracted from the multiple transitions recorded during daily living apparently reflect changes associated with aging and fall risk. Long-term monitoring of temporal features and their distribution may be helpful to provide a more complete and accurate assessment of the effects of aging and fall risk on daily function and mobility.
BACKGROUND: Functional performance-based tests like the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and its subtasks have been associated with fall risk, future disability, nursing home admission, and other poor outcomes in older adults. However, a single measurement in the laboratory may not fully reflect the subject's condition and everyday performance. To begin to validate an approach based on long-term, continuous monitoring, we investigated the sit-to-walk and walk-to-sit transitions performed spontaneously and naturally during daily living. METHODS: Thirty young adults, 38 older adults, and 33 elderly (idiopathic) fallers were studied. After evaluating mobility and functional performance in the laboratory, participants wore an accelerometer on their lower back for 3 days. We analyzed the sit-to-walk and walk-to-sit transitions using temporal and distribution-related features. Machine learning algorithms assessed the feature set's ability to discriminate between the different cohorts. RESULTS: 5,027 transitions were analyzed. Significant differences were observed between the young and older adults (p < .044) and between the fallers and older adults (p < .032). Machine learning algorithms classified the young and older adult with an accuracy of about 98% and the fallers and the older adults at 88%, which was better than the results achieved using traditional laboratory assessments (~72%). CONCLUSIONS: Features extracted from the multiple transitions recorded during daily living apparently reflect changes associated with aging and fall risk. Long-term monitoring of temporal features and their distribution may be helpful to provide a more complete and accurate assessment of the effects of aging and fall risk on daily function and mobility.
Authors: Jaime Lynn Speiser; Kathryn E Callahan; Denise K Houston; Jason Fanning; Thomas M Gill; Jack M Guralnik; Anne B Newman; Marco Pahor; W Jack Rejeski; Michael E Miller Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lauro V Ojeda; Peter G Adamczyk; John R Rebula; Linda V Nyquist; Debra M Strasburg; Neil B Alexander Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Matin Kheirkhahan; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Robert Axtell; Matthew P Buman; Roger A Fielding; Nancy W Glynn; Jack M Guralnik; Abby C King; Daniel K White; Michael E Miller; Juned Siddique; Peter Brubaker; W Jack Rejeski; Stephen Ranshous; Marco Pahor; Sanjay Ranka; Todd M Manini Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.833