Literature DB >> 27653966

Actigraphy features for predicting mobility disability in older adults.

Matin Kheirkhahan1, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Robert Axtell, Matthew P Buman, Roger A Fielding, Nancy W Glynn, Jack M Guralnik, Abby C King, Daniel K White, Michael E Miller, Juned Siddique, Peter Brubaker, W Jack Rejeski, Stephen Ranshous, Marco Pahor, Sanjay Ranka, Todd M Manini.   

Abstract

Actigraphy has attracted much attention for assessing physical activity in the past decade. Many algorithms have been developed to automate the analysis process, but none has targeted a general model to discover related features for detecting or predicting mobility function, or more specifically, mobility impairment and major mobility disability (MMD). Men (N  =  357) and women (N  =  778) aged 70-89 years wore a tri-axial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X) on the right hip during free-living conditions for 8.4  ±  3.0 d. One-second epoch data were summarized into 67 features. Several machine learning techniques were used to select features from the free-living condition to predict mobility impairment, defined as 400 m walking speed  <0.80 m s-1. Selected features were also included in a model to predict the first occurrence of MMD-defined as the loss in the ability to walk 400 m. Each method yielded a similar estimate of 400 m walking speed with a root mean square error of ~0.07 m s-1 and an R-squared values ranging from 0.37-0.41. Sensitivity and specificity of identifying slow walkers was approximately 70% and 80% for all methods, respectively. The top five features, which were related to movement pace and amount (activity counts and steps), length in activity engagement (bout length), accumulation patterns of activity, and movement variability significantly improved the prediction of MMD beyond that found with common covariates (age, diseases, anthropometry, etc). This study identified a subset of actigraphy features collected in free-living conditions that are moderately accurate in identifying persons with clinically-assessed mobility impaired and significantly improve the prediction of MMD. These findings suggest that the combination of features as opposed to a specific feature is important to consider when choosing features and/or combinations of features for prediction of mobility phenotypes in older adults.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27653966      PMCID: PMC5360536          DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/10/1813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  44 in total

1.  Objective measures of activity level and mortality in older men.

Authors:  Kristine E Ensrud; Terri L Blackwell; Jane A Cauley; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; John T Schousboe; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Katie L Stone; Douglas C Bauer; James M Shikany; Dawn C Mackey
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Toward automated, at-home assessment of mobility among patients with Parkinson disease, using a body-worn accelerometer.

Authors:  Aner Weiss; Sarvi Sharifi; Meir Plotnik; Jeroen P P van Vugt; Nir Giladi; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.

Authors:  Katherine Ellis; Jacqueline Kerr; Suneeta Godbole; Gert Lanckriet; David Wing; Simon Marshall
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking.

Authors:  N Y J M Leenders; T E Nelson; W M Sherman
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: relationship to Parkinsonian features, falls and response to levodopa.

Authors:  Joanna D Schaafsma; Nir Giladi; Yacov Balash; Anna L Bartels; Tanya Gurevich; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.181

6.  Sedentary lifestyle, poor cardiorespiratory fitness, and the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Timo A Lakka; David E Laaksonen; Hanna-Maaria Lakka; Niko Männikkö; Leo K Niskanen; Rainer Rauramaa; Jukka T Salonen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  A Validated Smartphone-Based Assessment of Gait and Gait Variability in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Robert J Ellis; Yee Sien Ng; Shenggao Zhu; Dawn M Tan; Boyd Anderson; Gottfried Schlaug; Ye Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using a body-fixed sensor to identify subclinical gait difficulties in older adults with IADL disability: maximizing the output of the timed up and go.

Authors:  Aner Weiss; Anat Mirelman; Aron S Buchman; David A Bennett; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mobility disability and the pattern of accelerometer-derived sedentary and physical activity behaviors in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Victor Ezeugwu; Rachel E Klaren; Elizabeth A Hubbard; Patricia Trish Manns; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-04-01

10.  Association between Community Ambulation Walking Patterns and Cognitive Function in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Further Insights into Motor-Cognitive Links.

Authors:  Aner Weiss; Talia Herman; Nir Giladi; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2015-10-29
View more
  6 in total

1.  A Case for Promoting Movement Medicine: Preventing Disability in the LIFE Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jason Fanning; W Jack Rejeski; Shyh-Huei Chen; Barbara J Nicklas; Michael P Walkup; Robert S Axtell; Roger A Fielding; Nancy W Glynn; Abby C King; Todd M Manini; Mary M McDermott; Anne B Newman; Marco Pahor; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Michael E Miller
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  A comparison of accelerometry analysis methods for physical activity in older adult women and associations with health outcomes over time.

Authors:  Katie J Thralls; Suneeta Godbole; Todd M Manini; Eileen Johnson; Loki Natarajan; Jacqueline Kerr
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  A smartwatch-based framework for real-time and online assessment and mobility monitoring.

Authors:  Matin Kheirkhahan; Sanjay Nair; Anis Davoudi; Parisa Rashidi; Amal A Wanigatunga; Duane B Corbett; Tonatiuh Mendoza; Todd M Manini; Sanjay Ranka
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  A review of physiological and behavioral monitoring with digital sensors for neuropsychiatric illnesses.

Authors:  Erik Reinertsen; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Wrist accelerometer shape feature derivation methods for assessing activities of daily living.

Authors:  Matin Kheirkhahan; Avirup Chakraborty; Amal A Wanigatunga; Duane B Corbett; Todd M Manini; Sanjay Ranka
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Multimodal Imaging of Brain Activity to Investigate Walking and Mobility Decline in Older Adults (Mind in Motion Study): Hypothesis, Theory, and Methods.

Authors:  David J Clark; Todd M Manini; Daniel P Ferris; Chris J Hass; Babette A Brumback; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Marco Pahor; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.