Literature DB >> 25934629

Ruminal Bacterial Community Composition in Dairy Cows Is Dynamic over the Course of Two Lactations and Correlates with Feed Efficiency.

Kelsea A Jewell1, Caroline A McCormick1, Christine L Odt2, Paul J Weimer3, Garret Suen4.   

Abstract

Fourteen Holstein cows of similar ages were monitored through their first two lactation cycles, during which ruminal solids and liquids, milk samples, production data, and feed consumption data were collected for each cow during early (76 to 82 days in milk [DIM]), middle (151 to 157 DIM), and late (251 to 257 DIM) lactation periods. The bacterial community of each ruminal sample was determined by sequencing the region from V6 to V8 of the 16S rRNA gene using 454 pyrosequencing. Gross feed efficiency (GFE) for each cow was calculated by dividing her energy-corrected milk by dry matter intake (ECM/DMI) for each period of both lactation cycles. Four pairs of cows were identified that differed in milk production efficiency, as defined by residual feed intake (RFI), at the same level of ECM production. The most abundant phyla detected for all cows were Bacteroidetes (49.42%), Firmicutes (39.32%), Proteobacteria (5.67%), and Tenericutes (2.17%), and the most abundant genera included Prevotella (40.15%), Butyrivibrio (2.38%), Ruminococcus (2.35%), Coprococcus (2.29%), and Succiniclasticum (2.28%). The bacterial microbiota between the first and second lactation cycles were highly similar, but with a significant correlation between total community composition by ruminal phase and specific bacteria whose relative sequence abundances displayed significant positive or negative correlation with GFE or RFI. These data suggest that the ruminal bacterial community is dynamic in terms of membership and diversity and that specific members are associated with high and low milk production efficiency over two lactation cycles.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25934629      PMCID: PMC4551193          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00720-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  38 in total

1.  Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle.

Authors:  Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Zhiquan Wang; Obioha N Durunna; Stephen S Moore; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Correlation between composition of the bacterial community and concentration of volatile fatty acids in the rumen during the transition period and ketosis in dairy cows.

Authors:  Xiaoxu Wang; Xiaobing Li; Chenxu Zhao; Pan Hu; Hui Chen; Zhaoxi Liu; Guowen Liu; Zhe Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Prediction of the energy value of cow's milk.

Authors:  H F Tyrrell; J T Reid
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 5.  Triennial Lactation Symposium: Opportunities for improving milk production efficiency in dairy cattle.

Authors:  E E Connor; J L Hutchison; K M Olson; H D Norman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Dominance of Prevotella and low abundance of classical ruminal bacterial species in the bovine rumen revealed by relative quantification real-time PCR.

Authors:  David M Stevenson; Paul J Weimer
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; David A Kenny; Sukkyan Han; Matthew S McCabe; Sinead M Waters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Composition and similarity of bovine rumen microbiota across individual animals.

Authors:  Elie Jami; Itzhak Mizrahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Next generation sequencing to define prokaryotic and fungal diversity in the bovine rumen.

Authors:  Derrick E Fouts; Sebastian Szpakowski; Janaki Purushe; Manolito Torralba; Richard C Waterman; Michael D MacNeil; Leeson J Alexander; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Dirk Gevers; Sarah L Westcott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  78 in total

1.  Validating the Use of Bovine Buccal Sampling as a Proxy for the Rumen Microbiota by Using a Time Course and Random Forest Classification Approach.

Authors:  Juliana Young; Joseph H Skarlupka; Madison S Cox; Rafael Tassinari Resende; Amelie Fischer; Kenneth F Kalscheur; Jennifer C McClure; John B Cole; Garret Suen; Derek M Bickhart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Buccal swabbing as a noninvasive method to determine bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic microbial community structures in the rumen.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Michelle R Kirk; Arjan Jonker; Alan McCulloch; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Zinc AA supplementation alters yearling ram rumen bacterial communities but zinc sulfate supplementation does not.

Authors:  Suzanne L Ishaq; Chad M Page; Carl J Yeoman; Thomas W Murphy; Megan L Van Emon; Whit C Stewart
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Response of Beef Cattle Fecal Microbiota to Grazing on Toxic Tall Fescue.

Authors:  Ryan S Mote; Nicholas S Hill; Joseph H Skarlupka; Zachary B Turner; Zachary P Sanders; Dean P Jones; Garret Suen; Nikolay M Filipov
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Effect of cattle breed and basal diet on digestibility, rumen bacterial communities, and eating and rumination activity.

Authors:  Pedro H V Carvalho; Ana C J Pinto; Danilo D Millen; Tara L Felix
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Targeting Bacteria and Methanogens To Understand the Role of Residual Slurry as an Inoculant in Stored Liquid Dairy Manure.

Authors:  Jemaneh Habtewold; Robert Gordon; Vera Sokolov; Andrew VanderZaag; Claudia Wagner-Riddle; Kari Dunfield
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Metagenomic analysis exploring taxonomic diversity of rumen microbial communities in Vechur and crossbred cattle of Kerala state, India.

Authors:  Tina Sadan; T V Aravindakshan; G Radhika; Lali F Anand; K Ally
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.

Authors:  Ursula M McCormack; Tânia Curião; Stefan G Buzoianu; Maria L Prieto; Tomas Ryan; Patrick Varley; Fiona Crispie; Elizabeth Magowan; Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli; Donagh Berry; Orla O'Sullivan; Paul D Cotter; Gillian E Gardiner; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Analysis of the Gut Microbial Diversity of Dairy Cows During Peak Lactation by PacBio Single-Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) Sequencing.

Authors:  Weicheng Li; Qiangchuan Hou; Yanjie Wang; Huimin Ma; Yahua Liu; Feiyan Zhao; Jing Li; Lai-Yu Kwok; Jie Yu; Zhihong Sun; Tiansong Sun
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Use of a Fluorescent Analog of Glucose (2-NBDG) To Identify Uncultured Rumen Bacteria That Take Up Glucose.

Authors:  Junyi Tao; Courtney McCourt; Halima Sultana; Corwin Nelson; John Driver; Timothy J Hackmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.