Literature DB >> 29374043

Targeting Bacteria and Methanogens To Understand the Role of Residual Slurry as an Inoculant in Stored Liquid Dairy Manure.

Jemaneh Habtewold1, Robert Gordon2, Vera Sokolov2, Andrew VanderZaag3, Claudia Wagner-Riddle1, Kari Dunfield4.   

Abstract

Microbial communities in residual slurry left after removal of stored liquid dairy manure have been presumed to increase methane emission during new storage, but these microbes have not been studied. While actual manure storage tanks are filled gradually, pilot- and farm-scale studies on methane emissions from such systems often use a batch approach. In this study, six pilot-scale outdoor storage tanks with (10% and 20%) and without residual slurry were filled (gradually or in batch) with fresh dairy manure, and methane and methanogenic and bacterial communities were studied during 120 days of storage. Regardless of filling type, increased residual slurry levels resulted in higher abundance of methanogens and bacteria after 65 days of storage. However, stronger correlation between methanogen abundance and methane flux was observed in gradually filled tanks. Despite some variations in the diversity of methanogens or bacteria with the presence of residual slurry, core phylotypes were not impacted. In all samples, the phylum Firmicutes predominated (∼57 to 70%) bacteria: >90% were members of ClostridiaMethanocorpusculum dominated (∼57 to 88%) archaeal phylotypes, while Methanosarcina gradually increased with storage time. During peak flux of methane, Methanosarcina was the major player in methane production. The results suggest that increased levels of residual slurry have little impact on the dominant methanogenic or bacterial phylotypes, but large population sizes of these organisms may result in increased methane flux during the initial phases of storage.IMPORTANCE Methane is the major greenhouse gas emitted from stored liquid dairy manure. Residual slurry left after removal of stored manure from tanks has been implicated in increasing methane emissions in new storages, and well-adapted microbial communities in it are the drivers of the increase. Linking methane flux to the abundance, diversity, and activity of microbial communities in stored slurries with different levels of residual slurry can help to improve the mitigation strategy. Mesoscale and lab-scale studies conducted so far on methane flux from manure storage systems used batch-filled tanks, while the actual condition in many farms involves gradual filling. Hence, this study provides important information toward determining levels of residual slurry that result in significant reduction of well-adapted microbial communities prior to storage, thereby reducing methane emissions from manure storage tanks filled under farm conditions.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy manure; greenhouse gas; methane; methanogen; residual slurry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29374043      PMCID: PMC5861833          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02830-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  52 in total

1.  The mcrA gene as an alternative to 16S rRNA in the phylogenetic analysis of methanogen populations in landfill.

Authors:  Philip E Luton; Jonathan M Wayne; Richard J Sharp; Paul W Riley
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Dairy Manure Total Solid Levels Impact CH Flux and Abundance of Methanogenic Archaeal Communities.

Authors:  J Habetwold; R J Gordon; J D Wood; C Wagner-Riddle; A C VanderZaag; K E Dunfield
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Dynamics of propionic acid degradation in a two-phase anaerobic system.

Authors:  Keke Xiao; Yan Zhou; Chenghong Guo; Yogananda Maspolim; Wun-Jern Ng
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Does Fall Removal of the Dairy Manure Sludge in a Storage Tank Reduce Subsequent Methane Emissions?

Authors:  Hambaliou Baldé; Andrew C VanderZaag; Stephen D Burtt; Robert J Gordon; Raymond L Desjardins
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Oxidation of 13C-labeled methane in surface crusts of pig- and cattle slurry.

Authors:  Per Ambus; Søren O Petersen
Journal:  Isotopes Environ Health Stud       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.675

Review 6.  Methanosarcina: the rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation.

Authors:  Jo De Vrieze; Tom Hennebel; Nico Boon; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 9.642

7.  Relationships between dairy slurry total solids, gas emissions, and surface crusts.

Authors:  J D Wood; R J Gordon; C Wagner-Riddle; K E Dunfield; A Madani
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  Eubacteria and archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Abendroth; Cristina Vilanova; Thomas Günther; Olaf Luschnig; Manuel Porcar
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure.

Authors:  Li Sun; Phillip B Pope; Vincent G H Eijsink; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Lessons learned from the microbial ecology resulting from different inoculation strategies for biogas production from waste products of the bioethanol/sugar industry.

Authors:  Athaydes Francisco Leite; Leandro Janke; Hauke Harms; Hans-Hermann Richnow; Marcell Nikolausz
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 6.040

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reduction in Methane Emissions From Acidified Dairy Slurry Is Related to Inhibition of Methanosarcina Species.

Authors:  Jemaneh Habtewold; Robert Gordon; Vera Sokolov; Andrew VanderZaag; Claudia Wagner-Riddle; Kari Dunfield
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.