Literature DB >> 25933644

The CIRSE Retrievable IVC Filter Registry: Retrieval Success Rates in Practice.

M J Lee1, D Valenti2, M A de Gregorio3, J Minocha4, U Rimon5, O Pellerin6.   

Abstract

CIRSE established a registry of retrievable filter use with the primary aim of determining the success of IVC Filter retrieval and associated complications. Secondary endpoints included filter indications, imaging strategies before retrieval, filter dwell times, and anticoagulation status. A web-based electronic registry was hosted between 01/12/2010 and 30/06/2012. Data entry occurred at the date of IVC filter retrieval and included items such as filter type, indication for filter insertion, access route, dwell time, retrieval success, complications, reasons for failed retrieval, and anticoagulation status. 671 filter retrievals were entered (male:female 333:295, mean age 55, median 57). Retrieval data were not entered in 43/671 leaving 628 patients for analysis. The 4 commonest retrievable filters used were the Celect in 182 patients, the OPTEASE in 161, ALN in 120, and Gunther Tulip in 98. Filters were inserted for absolute indications 40%, relative indications in 31%, and prophylactic in 24%, with 5% missing. Mean filter dwell time was 90 days. Filters were successfully retrieved in 576/628 patients (92%). The mean dwell time for successful retrievals was 85 days versus 145 days for unsuccessful retrievals (p = 0.001). Major complications occurred in 2 patients (0.03%). In summary, the CIRSE retrievable filter registry demonstrates a retrieval rate of 92% across a range of filter types, with a low major complication rate, reflecting current practice. There is an increase in trend of retrievable filter use for relative and prophylactic indications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inferior vena cava filter (IVC) placement; Pulmonary embolism (PE); Vena cava; Venous intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25933644     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1112-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

Review 1.  Permanent versus Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Rethinking the "One-Filter-for-All" Approach to Mechanical Thromboembolic Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christine E Ghatan; Robert K Ryu
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Ten-year experience of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  George Tse; Trevor Cleveland; Stephen Goode
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Feasibility and Acute Safety Study of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery to the Vena Caval Wall via an IVC Filter in Swine.

Authors:  Reza Seifabadi; William F Pritchard; Shelby Leonard; Ivane Bakhutashvili; David L Woods; Juan A Esparza-Trujillo; John W Karanian; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 4.  Back to the Basics: Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

Authors:  Brian Covello; Martin Radvany
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.780

5.  An analysis of factors associated with increased fluoroscopy time or the need for complex techniques at IVC filter retrieval.

Authors:  Mark Kleedehn; Kelli Moore; Katherine Longo; Kaitlin Woo; Paul Laeseke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Interventional radiology treatment for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Miguel A De Gregorio; Jose A Guirola; Celia Lahuerta; Carolina Serrano; Ana L Figueredo; William T Kuo
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28

7.  Ibero-American Society of Interventionism (SIDI) and the Spanish Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) Standard of Practice (SOP) for the Management of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Miguel A De Gregorio; Jose A Guirola; Sergio Sierre; Jose Urbano; Juan Jose Ciampi-Dopazo; Jose M Abadal; Juan Pulido; Eduardo Eyheremendy; Elena Lonjedo; Guadalupe Guerrero; Carolina Serrano-Casorran; Pedro Pardo; Micaela Arrieta; Jose Rodriguez-Gomez; Cristina Bonastre; George Behrens; Carlos Lanciego; Hector Ferral; Mariano Magallanes; Santiago Mendez; Mercedes Perez; Jimena Gonzalez-Nieto; William T Kuo; David Jimenez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  A single center 9-year experience in IVC filter retrieval - the importance of an IVC filter registry.

Authors:  Mark Sheehan; Kristopher Coppin; Cormac O'Brien; Andrew McGrath; Mark Given; Aoife Keeling; Michael J Lee
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2022-03-05

Review 9.  Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; David C Rotzinger; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03

10.  Spanish multicenter real - life registry of retrievable vena cava filters (REFiVeC).

Authors:  Miguel A De Gregorio; Jose A Guirola; Jose Urbano; Ignacio Díaz-Lorenzo; Jose J Muñoz; Elena Villacastin; Antonio Lopez-Medina; Ana L Figueredo; Javier Guerrero; Sergio Sierre; Javier Blazquez Sanchez; William T Kuo; David Jimenez
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2020-05-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.