Literature DB >> 25933475

Effects of Carotid Endarterectomy on Cerebral Reperfusion and Cognitive Function in Patients with High Grade Carotid Stenosis: A Perfusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Q Wang1, M Zhou1, Y Zhou1, J Ji1, D Raithel2, T Qiao3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on cerebral perfusion and cognitive function in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis (ICA).
METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Shunted patients were excluded. Cerebral perfusion was measured by magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in 46 patients with >65% ICA (31 males, 64.5 ± 6.7 years) 1 week before and 6 weeks after CEA. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) 1 week before and 6 weeks after CEA.
RESULTS: After CEA, perfusion parameters from PWI decreased, including mean transit time (MTT) (21.07 ± 7.36 vs. 14.27 ± 6.22, p < .0001), time to peak (TTP) (28.69 ± 8.54 vs. 23.45 ± 4.25, p = .001), arrive time (T0) (19.89 ± 7.32 vs. 15.20 ± 3.51, p = .001), and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) (11.48 ± 3.50 vs. 7.53 ± 3.17, p < .0001). A significant improvement was observed in MoCA (20.48 ± 1.70 vs. 22.04 ± 1.48, p = .001). Spearman's rank correlation analysis between TTP and MoCA scores demonstrated a linear relationship with an excellent correlation coefficient (R = -.893, p < .001). Linear regression indicated that diabetes was a risk factor for cognitive improvement in patients with ICA (p = .014). Further analysis showed that patients with DM performed worse in MoCA after the procedure (with-DM 21.15 ± 1.28 vs. non-DM 22.4 ± 1.46, p = .010) while the baselines were similar (non-DM: 20.3 ± 1.8 vs. with-DM: 20.9 ± 1.4, p = .362).
CONCLUSION: CEA could improve the cerebral perfusion and the cognitive function in un-shunted ICA patients. Cerebral reperfusion was an important factor for cognitive improvement. Diabetes had a negative effect on cognitive improvement after CEA.
Copyright © 2015 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; Carotid stenosis; Cognitive function; Perfusion weighted imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25933475     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  9 in total

1.  Rationale and Design for the Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  Natalie D Sridharan; Darve Robinson; Partha Thirumala; Ali Arak; Oladipupo Olafiranye; Edith Tzeng; Efthymios Avgerinos
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  Flow-metabolism uncoupling in patients with asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis assessed by multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jens Göttler; Stephan Kaczmarz; Michael Kallmayer; Isabel Wustrow; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Claus Zimmer; Christian Sorg; Christine Preibisch; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Silent brain infarcts on diffusion-weighted imaging after carotid revascularisation: A surrogate outcome measure for procedural stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Traenka; Stefan T Engelter; Martin M Brown; Joanna Dobson; Chris Frost; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2019-01-15

4.  Revascularization for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis improves balance and mobility.

Authors:  Vicki L Gray; Sarasijhaa K Desikan; Amir A Khan; Dawn Barth; Siddhartha Sikdar; John D Sorkin; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.860

5.  Carotid artery calcification score and its association with cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Zhou Chu; Liu Cheng; Qiao Tong
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.458

6.  Dynamics of brain perfusion and cognitive performance in revascularization of carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Julian Schröder; Marlene Heinze; Matthias Günther; Bastian Cheng; Alina Nickel; Tanja Schröder; Felix Fischer; Simon S Kessner; Tim Magnus; Jens Fiehler; Axel Larena-Avellaneda; Christian Gerloff; Götz Thomalla
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Research hotspots and trends of multimodality MRI on vascular cognitive impairment in recent 12 years: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Mei-Hui Xia; Ang Li; Rui-Xue Gao; Xiao-Ling Li; Qinhong Zhang; Xin Tong; Wei-Wei Zhao; Dan-Na Cao; Ze-Yi Wei; Jinhuan Yue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis after carotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Rafał Badacz; Anna Kabłak-Ziembicka; Małgorzata Urbańczyk-Zawadzka; Robert P Banyś; Piotr Musiałek; Piotr Odrowąż-Pieniążek; Mariusz Trystuła; Jan Ścigalski; Krzysztof Żmudka; Tadeusz Przewłocki
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.426

9.  Effect of Carotid Artery Morphological Variations on Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Jialu Huang; Suxia Wang; Hong Ran; Lan Wen; Kangning Chen; Zhenhua Zhou
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.342

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.