| Literature DB >> 36042608 |
Mei-Hui Xia1, Ang Li2, Rui-Xue Gao3, Xiao-Ling Li4, Qinhong Zhang5, Xin Tong3, Wei-Wei Zhao6, Dan-Na Cao4, Ze-Yi Wei3, Jinhuan Yue5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multimodality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to detect vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). However, a bibliometric analysis of this issue remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the research hotspots and trends of multimodality MRI on VCI over the past 12 years based on the Web of Science core collection using CiteSpace Software (6.1R2).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36042608 PMCID: PMC9410608 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030172
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Detailed search strategy.
| Set | Result | Search query |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | 171,286 | Functional magnetic resonance imaging OR fMRI OR 3D-arterial spin labeling OR 3D-ASL OR diffusion tensor imaging OR DTI OR magnetic resonance spectroscopy OR MRS OR susceptibility weighted imaging OR SWI OR rest state functional magnetic resonance imaging OR rs-fMRI OR magnetic resonance perfusion weighted imaging OR MR PWI |
| #2 | 9106 | Vascular Cognitive Impairment*OR Vascular Cognitive Dysfunction* |
| #3 | 606 | #1AND#2 REFINING ELIMINATION engineering electrical electronic or optics or public environmental occupational health |
3D-ASL = 3-dimensional arterial spin labeling, DTI = diffusion tensor imaging, fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging, MR PWI = magnetic resonance perfusion weighted imaging, MRS = magnetic resonance spectroscopy, rs-fMRI = rest state fMRI, SWI = susceptibility weighted imaging.
Figure 1.Number of annual publications.
Figure 2.National cooperative network analysis.
Top 10 countries with the largest number of publications.
| Ranking | Country | Frequency | Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USA | 182 | 0.09 |
| 2 | Peoples R China | 145 | 0.04 |
| 3 | England | 68 | 0.10 |
| 4 | Germany | 61 | 0.09 |
| 5 | Netherlands | 56 | 0.08 |
| 6 | Canada | 52 | 0.13 |
| 7 | Italy | 47 | 0.09 |
| 8 | France | 31 | 0.05 |
| 9 | Australia | 28 | 0.01 |
| 10 | South Korea | 28 | 0.12 |
Figure 3.Institution collaboration network analysis.
Top 10 institutions with the largest number of publications.
| Ranking | Institution | Frequency | Centrality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Capital Medical University | 21 | 0.11 |
| 2 | Radboud University Nijmegen | 18 | 0.03 |
| 3 | University of Toronto | 18 | 0.10 |
| 4 | Harvard Medical School | 16 | 0.13 |
| 5 | University of Cambridge | 15 | 0.05 |
| 6 | Harvard University | 14 | 0.05 |
| 7 | University of California, San Francisco | 11 | 0.22 |
| 8 | Fudan University | 10 | 0.00 |
| 9 | German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, DZNE | 9 | 0.38 |
| 10 | Karolinska Institute | 8 | 0.16 |
Top 10 journals with the largest number of publications.
| Ranking | Journal | Frequency | IF (2020) | Quartile in category (2020) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 33 | 4.472 | Q2 |
| 2 |
| 32 | 5.750 | Q1 |
| 3 |
| 24 | 3.240 | Q2 |
| 4 |
| 21 | 6.200 | Q1 |
| 5 |
| 17 | 7.914 | Q1 |
| 6 |
| 16 | 4.673 | Q2 |
| 7 |
| 15 | 4.003 | Q2 |
| 8 |
| 14 | 9.910 | Q1 |
| 9 |
| 13 | 5.038 | Q1 |
| 10 |
| 13 | 4.881 | Q2 |
IF = impact factor.
IF in category according to Journal Citation Reports (2020).
Top 10 cited journals with the largest number of publications.
| Ranking | Journal | Frequency | Centrality | IF (2020) | Quartile in category (2020) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 492 | 0.14 | 9.910 | Q1 |
| 2 |
| 446 | 0.02 | 7.914 | Q1 |
| 3 |
| 421 | 0.02 | 6.556 | Q1 |
| 4 |
| 341 | 0.03 | 4.673 | Q2 |
| 5 |
| 334 | 0.09 | 13.501 | Q1 |
| 6 |
| 322 | 0.01 | 44.182 | Q1 |
| 7 |
| 293 | 0.00 | 10.154 | Q1 |
| 8 |
| 274 | 0.01 | 3.240 | Q2 |
| 9 |
| 271 | 0.05 | 4.419 | Q1 |
| 10 |
| 271 | 0.01 | 4.472 | Q2 |
IF = impact factor.
IF in category according to Journal Citation Reports (2020).
Figure 4.Co-cited journal network analysis.
Figure 5.Author collaboration visualization network analysis.
Top 10 authors with the largest number of publications.
| Ranking | Frequency | Author | Ranking | Centrality | Author |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | De Leeuw FE | 1 | 0.04 | De Leeuw FE (11) |
| 2 | 9 | Markus HS | 2 | 0.04 | Benno Gesierich (4) |
| 3 | 8 | Zhou Y | 3 | 0.03 | Alexander Leemans (3) |
| 4 | 8 | Tuladhar AM | 4 | 0.03 | Marco Duering (8) |
| 5 | 6 | Dichgans M | 5 | 0.02 | Marco Pasl (2) |
| 6 | 6 | Duering M | 6 | 0.02 | Anand Vlswanathan (3) |
| 7 | 6 | Norris DL | 7 | 0.02 | Yael D Reijmer (4) |
| 8 | 6 | Wang Y | 8 | 0.02 | Leonardo Pantoni (5) |
| 9 | 5 | Xu Q | 9 | 0.02 | Anil M Tuladhar (6) |
| 10 | 5 | Na DL | 10 | 0.01 | Alexander Thiel (1) |
Figure 6.Co-cited author collaboration visualization network analysis.
Top 10 cited authors with the largest number of publications.
| Ranking | Frequency | Cited author | Ranking | Centrality | Cited author |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 123 | Wardlaw JM | 1 | 0.24 | Salat DH |
| 2 | 122 | Fazekas F | 2 | 0.23 | Hanyu H |
| 3 | 122 | Smith SM | 3 | 0.20 | Jack CR |
| 4 | 111 | Roman GC | 4 | 0.18 | Bastos-LEITE AJ |
| 5 | 109 | Pantoni L | 5 | 0.18 | Chao LL |
| 6 | 93 | Folstein MF | 6 | 0.15 | Awad IA |
| 7 | 81 | Obrien JT | 7 | 0.14 | Hachinski VC |
| 8 | 75 | Petersen RC | 8 | 0.13 | Alsop DC |
| 9 | 75 | Osullivan M | 9 | 0.13 | Dickerson BC |
| 10 | 72 | Gorelick PB | 10 | 0.13 | Gouw AA |
Figure 7.Keyword co-occurrence visualization network analysis.
List of co-occurrence keywords.
| Ranking | Frequency | Keyword | Centrality | Ranking | Centrality | Keyword | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 276 | Alzheimer’s disease | 0.01 | 1 | 0.13 | Cerebral blood flow | 88 |
| 2 | 249 | Vascular cognitive impairment | 0.02 | 2 | 0.10 | Mild cognitive impairment | 157 |
| 3 | 206 | White matter hyperintensity | 0.03 | 3 | 0.08 | Older adult | 25 |
| 4 | 195 | Cerebrovascular disease | 0.04 | 4 | 0.08 | Magnetic resonance spectroscopy | 38 |
| 5 | 179 | Dementia | 0.02 | 5 | 0.08 | Age | 54 |
| 6 | 162 | MRI | 0.04 | 6 | 0.08 | Brain | 105 |
| 7 | 157 | Mild cognitive impairment | 0.10 | 7 | 0.06 | Default mode network | 18 |
| 8 | 120 | Risk factor | 0.04 | 8 | 0.06 | Blood pressure | 23 |
| 9 | 105 | Diffusion tensor imaging | 0.06 | 9 | 0.06 | Atrophy | 26 |
| 10 | 105 | Brain | 0.08 | 10 | 0.06 | Diffusion tensor imaging | 105 |
MRI = magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 8.Keyword cluster network analysis.
List of keyword clusters.
| Cluster no. | Scale | Contour value | Year | Label (LLR) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #0 | 51 | 0.718 | 2012 | fMRI (17.1, 1.0E–4) |
| #1 | 43 | 0.753 | 2018 | Neurovascular coupling (14.35, 0.001) |
| #2 | 42 | 0.702 | 2015 | Acute ischemic stroke (11.95, 0.001) |
| #3 | 41 | 0.740 | 2016 | Depression (25.57, 1.0E–4) |
| #4 | 41 | 0.849 | 2012 | DTI (16.19, 1.0E–4) |
| #5 | 40 | 0.714 | 2016 | DTI (13.04, 0.001) |
| #6 | 40 | 0.715 | 2014 | Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (14.38, 0.001) |
| #7 | 38 | 0.717 | 2013 | Cerebral microbleeds (15.69, 1.0E–4) |
| #8 | 35 | 0.712 | 2012 | Cognitive performance (17.39, 1.0E–4) |
| #9 | 32 | 0.561 | 2015 | Arterial spin labeling (8.95, 0.005) |
| #10 | 31 | 0.796 | 2012 | Alzheimer’s disease (22.47, 1.0E–4) |
| #11 | 19 | 0.718 | 2014 | White matter integrity (11.25, 0.001) |
| #12 | 13 | 0.753 | 2012 | Cerebral blood flow (12.41, 0.001) |
DTI =diffusion tensor imaging, LLR = log-likelihood test, fMRI =functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Cited reference with top 5 centrality.
| Ranking | Cited reference | Representative author | Centrality | Journal | Publication year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Resting-state functional MR imaging: a new window to the brain | Barkhof F | 0.37 |
| 2014 |
| 2 | Pathoconnectomics of cognitive impairment in small vessel disease: a systematic review | Dey AK | 0.25 |
| 2016 |
| 3 | ASL perfusion MRI predicts cognitive decline and conversion from MCI to dementia | Chao LL | 0.25 |
| 2010 |
| 4 | Diffusion tensor changes in patients with amnesic mild cognitive impairment and various dementias | Chen TF | 0.15 |
| 2009 |
| 5 | Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer disease | Bartzokis G | 0.13 |
| 2004 |
Top 5 cited reference with highest frequency.
| Ranking | Cited reference | Representative author | Frequency | Journal | Publication year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration | Wardlaw JM. | 91 |
| 2013 |
| 2 | Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association | Gorelick PB | 48 |
| 2011 |
| 3 | Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges | Pantoni L | 36 |
| 2010 |
| 4 | Structural network efficiency is associated with cognitive impairment in small vessel disease | Lawrence AJ | 27 |
| 2014 |
| 5 | The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease | McKhann GM | 27 |
| 2011 |
Figure 9.Network analysis of keyword bursts.