Literature DB >> 25932961

Uterine smooth muscle tumor analysis by comparative genomic hybridization: a useful diagnostic tool in challenging lesions.

Sabrina Croce1, Agnes Ribeiro2, Celine Brulard2, Jean-Christophe Noel3, Frederic Amant4, Eberhard Stoeckle5, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheborah6, Anne Floquet7, Laurent Arnould8, Frederic Guyon5, Florence Mishellany9, Delphine Garbay7, Tine Cuppens4, Michal Zikan10, Agnès Leroux11, Eric Frouin12, Pierre Duvillard13, Philippe Terrier13, Isabelle Farre14, Isabelle Valo15, Gaetan M MacGrogan2, Frederic Chibon1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis and management of uterine smooth muscle tumors with uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) is often challenging, and genomic data on these lesions as well as on uterine smooth muscle lesions are limited. We tested the hypothesis that genomic profile determination by array-CGH could split STUMP into a benign group with scarce chromosomal alterations akin to leiomyoma and a malignant group with high chromosomal instability akin to leiomyosarcoma. Array-CGH genomic profile analysis was conducted for a series of 29 cases of uterine STUMP. A group of ten uterine leiomyomas and ten uterine leiomyosarcomas served as controls. The mean age was 50 years (range, 24-85) and the follow-up ranged from 12 to 156 months (average 70 months). Since STUMP is a heterogenous group of tumors with genomic profiles that can harbor few to many chromosomal alterations, we compared genomic indices in leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas and set a genomic index=10 threshold. Tumors with a genomic index <10 were classified as nonrecurring STUMPs and those with a genomic index >10 represented STUMPs with recurrences and unfavorable outcomes. Hence, the genomic index threshold splits the STUMP category into two groups of tumors with different outcomes: a group comparable to leiomyomas and another similar to leiomyosarcomas, but more indolent. In our STUMP series, genomic analysis by array-CGH is an innovative diagnostic tool for problematic smooth muscle uterine lesions, complementary to the morphological evaluation approach. We provide an improved classification method for distinguishing truly malignant tumors from benign lesions within the category of STUMP, especially those with equivocal morphological features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25932961     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  21 in total

Review 1.  Uterine smooth muscle tumors other than the ordinary leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas: a review of selected variants with emphasis on recent advances and unusual morphology that may cause concern for malignancy.

Authors:  Philip P C Ip; Ka Yu Tse; Kar Fai Tam
Journal:  Adv Anat Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.875

2.  Ki-67 expression in patients with uterine leiomyomas, uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) and uterine leiomyosarcomas (LMS).

Authors:  Klaus Mayerhofer; Plamen Lozanov; Klaus Bodner; Barbara Bodner-Adler; Oliver Kimberger; Klaus Czerwenka
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Genome-wide analysis of loss of heterozygosity and copy number amplification in uterine leiomyomas using the 100K single nucleotide polymorphism array.

Authors:  Kellen L Meadows; Danica M K Andrews; Zongli Xu; Gleta K Carswell; Shannon K Laughlin; Donna D Baird; Jack A Taylor
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.362

4.  "Low-grade leiomyosarcoma" and late-recurring smooth muscle tumors of the uterus: a heterogenous collection of frequently misdiagnosed tumors associated with an overall favorable prognosis relative to conventional uterine leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  Emanuela Veras; Oliver Zivanovic; Lindsay Jacks; Daniel Chiappetta; Martee Hensley; Robert Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Uterine leiomyosarcomas: tumor size, mitotic index, and biomarkers Ki67, and Bcl-2 identify two groups with different prognosis.

Authors:  Emanuela D'Angelo; Inigo Espinosa; Rola Ali; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Cheng-Han Lee; Jaime Prat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Analysis of Ki-ras, p53, and MDM2 genes in uterine leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas.

Authors:  K L Hall; M G Teneriello; R R Taylor; S Lemon; M Ebina; R I Linnoila; J H Norris; R C Park; M J Birrer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases.

Authors:  S W Bell; R L Kempson; M R Hendrickson
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Interobserver variability in the interpretation of tumor cell necrosis in uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Diana Lim; Teresa Alvarez; Marisa R Nucci; Blake Gilks; Teri Longacre; Robert A Soslow; Esther Oliva
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  p53 alterations in uterine leiomyosarcomas versus leiomyomas.

Authors:  S de Vos; S P Wilczynski; M Fleischhacker; P Koeffler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases.

Authors:  Philip P C Ip; Annie N Y Cheung; Philip B Clement
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  12 in total

1.  Genome profiling is an efficient tool to avoid the STUMP classification of uterine smooth muscle lesions: a comprehensive array-genomic hybridization analysis of 77 tumors.

Authors:  Sabrina Croce; Agnès Ducoulombier; Agnès Ribeiro; Tom Lesluyes; Jean-Christophe Noel; Frédéric Amant; Louis Guillou; Eberhard Stoeckle; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran; Nicolas Penel; Anne Floquet; Laurent Arnould; Frédéric Guyon; Florence Mishellany; Camille Chakiba; Tine Cuppens; Michal Zikan; Agnès Leroux; Eric Frouin; Isabelle Farre; Catherine Genestie; Isabelle Valo; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Frédéric Chibon
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Clinical and Histopathological Predictors of Recurrence in Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumor of Uncertain Malignant Potential (STUMP): A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of Tertiary Centers.

Authors:  Fulvio Borella; Stefano Cosma; Domenico Ferraioli; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Nicolas Chopin; Pierre Meeus; Vincent Cockenpot; Giorgio Valabrega; Giulia Scotto; Margherita Turinetto; Nicoletta Biglia; Luca Fuso; Luca Mariani; Dorella Franchi; Ailyn Mariela Vidal Urbinati; Ida Pino; Gianluca Bertschy; Mario Preti; Chiara Benedetto; Isabella Castellano; Paola Cassoni; Luca Bertero
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Exploring chromosomal abnormalities and genetic changes in uterine smooth muscle tumors.

Authors:  Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Ellen Heitzer; Karin Flicker; Stephanie Müller; Peter Ulz; Ozlen Saglam; Fattaneh Tavassoli; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran; Jochen Geigl; Farid Moinfar
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  Reasons to Reconsider Risk Associated With Power Morcellation of Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Burkhard Helmke; Joern Bullerdiek; Carsten Holzmann; Wolfgang Kuepker; Birgit Rommel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Genomic, Epigenomic, and Transcriptomic Profiling towards Identifying Omics Features and Specific Biomarkers That Distinguish Uterine Leiomyosarcoma and Leiomyoma at Molecular Levels.

Authors:  Tomoko Miyata; Kenzo Sonoda; Junko Tomikawa; Chiharu Tayama; Kohji Okamura; Kayoko Maehara; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Norio Wake; Kiyoko Kato; Kenichiro Hata; Kazuhiko Nakabayashi
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2015-12-28

Review 6.  Uterine fibroids - what's new?

Authors:  Alistair R W Williams
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-07

7.  Uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: fertility and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Hanifi Şahin; Funda Karatas; Gonca Coban; Özlem Özen; Özlem Erdem; Mehmet Anıl Onan; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  Molecular and clinicopathologic characterization of intravenous leiomyomatosis.

Authors:  Zehra Ordulu; Hongyan Chai; Gang Peng; Anna G McDonald; Michele De Nictolis; Eugenia Garcia-Fernandez; David Hardisson; Jaime Prat; Peining Li; Pei Hui; Esther Oliva; Natalia Buza
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Clinical and reproductive outcomes of uterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Chengcheng Ning; Lihong Zhang; Chenyan Zhao; Xiaojun Chen; Xiaoxia Liu; Chao Gu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Cytogenomic Profile of Uterine Leiomyoma: In Vivo vs. In Vitro Comparison.

Authors:  Alla S Koltsova; Olga A Efimova; Olga V Malysheva; Natalia S Osinovskaya; Thomas Liehr; Ahmed Al-Rikabi; Natalia Yu Shved; Iskender Yu Sultanov; Olga G Chiryaeva; Maria I Yarmolinskaya; Nikolai I Polenov; Vladislava V Kunitsa; Maka I Kakhiani; Tatyana G Tral; Gulrukhsor Kh Tolibova; Olesya N Bespalova; Igor Yu Kogan; Andrey S Glotov; Vladislav S Baranov; Anna A Pendina
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-11-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.