Literature DB >> 19417585

Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): a clinicopathologic analysis of 16 cases.

Philip P C Ip1, Annie N Y Cheung, Philip B Clement.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current World Health Organization classification indicates that a uterine smooth muscle tumor that cannot be histologically diagnosed as unequivocally benign or malignant should be termed "smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential" (STUMP). STUMPs represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors that have been the subject of only a few published studies, some of which lack detailed clinicopathologic details and/or follow-up data. More recently, it has been suggested that immunohistochemical staining may be helpful in the diagnosis of STUMPs.
DESIGN: The clinicopathologic features of 16 cases of STUMP that exhibited usual smooth muscle differentiation, diagnosed between 1992 and 2006 from 11 hospitals, were studied and classified into 4 subgroups using terminology and criteria described by Stanford investigators. Immunohistochemical stains for p16, p53, MIB1 (ki-67), and estrogen and progesterone receptors were performed. The results were compared with those in the literature.
RESULTS: The tumors were classified as follows: 6 as "atypical leiomyoma with limited experience", 7 as "smooth muscle tumor of low malignant potential", 2 as "atypical leiomyoma, low risk of recurrence," and 1 as "mitotically active leiomyoma, limited experience." Follow-up was 21 to 192 months (mean, 80.8 and median, 51.5). Only 2 tumors recurred, at 15 and 51 months, respectively; both were atypical leiomyoma with limited experience (multifocal moderate-to-severe atypia, no tumor cell necrosis, and mitotic counts of 4 and 5 mitotic figures /10 high-power fields, respectively). Both tumors had areas that were indistinguishable from benign leiomyoma and both had diffuse immunoreactivity for p16 and p53. Six other tumors that had focal staining for these markers all had a benign outcome. Both patients with recurrence were alive at last follow-up (at 40 and 74 mo). All the other patients were alive and disease-free.
CONCLUSIONS: This and other studies suggest that uterine tumors classified as STUMPs using criteria proposed by Stanford investigators are usually clinically benign but should be considered tumors of low malignant potential because they can occasionally recur, in some cases, years after hysterectomy. After a mean follow-up of 80.8 months, only 2 of 16 tumors in this study recurred. Both of the latter tumors fulfilled the criteria for atypical leiomyoma with limited experience. Notably, the 2 recurrent tumors were the only ones that were strongly immunoreactive for p16 and p53, supporting earlier observations that these markers may be helpful in the prediction of the behavior of STUMPs. Patients diagnosed with STUMPs should receive long-term surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19417585     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181a02d1c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  40 in total

1.  Uterine smooth muscle tumor analysis by comparative genomic hybridization: a useful diagnostic tool in challenging lesions.

Authors:  Sabrina Croce; Agnes Ribeiro; Celine Brulard; Jean-Christophe Noel; Frederic Amant; Eberhard Stoeckle; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheborah; Anne Floquet; Laurent Arnould; Frederic Guyon; Florence Mishellany; Delphine Garbay; Tine Cuppens; Michal Zikan; Agnès Leroux; Eric Frouin; Pierre Duvillard; Philippe Terrier; Isabelle Farre; Isabelle Valo; Gaetan M MacGrogan; Frederic Chibon
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  [New features in the 2014 WHO classification of uterine neoplasms].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Criteria for Risk Stratification of Vulvar and Vaginal Smooth Muscle Tumors: An Evaluation of 71 Cases Comparing Proposed Classification Systems.

Authors:  Sadia Sayeed; Deyin Xing; Sarah M Jenkins; Paul S Weisman; Darya Buehler; Laura Warmke; Cora Uram-Tuculescu; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Brooke E Howitt; Cherise Cortese; Kay J Park; J Kenneth Schoolmeester
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  A clinicopathological study of atypical leiomyomas: Benign variant leiomyoma or smooth-muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential.

Authors:  Ioannis Kalogiannidis; Thomas Stavrakis; Themistoklis Dagklis; Stamatios Petousis; Christina Nikolaidou; Ioannis Venizelos; David Rousso
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Uterine smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP): pathology, follow-up and recurrence.

Authors:  Andrea Dall'Asta; Salvatore Gizzo; Andrea Musarò; Michela Quaranta; Marco Noventa; Costanza Migliavacca; Giulio Sozzi; Michela Monica; Daniele Mautone; Roberto Berretta
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

6.  Biomarker resolution of uterine smooth muscle tumor necrosis as benign vs malignant.

Authors:  Eric J Yang; George L Mutter
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Exploring chromosomal abnormalities and genetic changes in uterine smooth muscle tumors.

Authors:  Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Ellen Heitzer; Karin Flicker; Stephanie Müller; Peter Ulz; Ozlen Saglam; Fattaneh Tavassoli; Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran; Jochen Geigl; Farid Moinfar
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Diagnostic value of progesterone receptor, p16, p53 and pHH3 expression in uterine atypical leiomyoma.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Xiaofei Zhang; Xiaoduan Chen; Weiguo Lü
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-06-01

9.  Pulmonary Metastases of a Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumour with Undefined Malignancy Potential.

Authors:  M Esch; M Teschner; J-H Braesen
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 10.  Breast lesions of uncertain malignant nature and limited metastatic potential: proposals to improve their recognition and clinical management.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Sunil Badve; Vincenzo Eusebi; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Stephen B Fox; David J Dabbs; Thomas Decker; Zsolt Hodi; Shu Ichihara; Andrew H S Lee; José Palacios; Andrea L Richardson; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Fernando C Schmitt; Puay-Hoon Tan; Gary M Tse; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.