Literature DB >> 25931956

Description of a new species of Wormaldia from Sardinia and a new Drusus species from the Western Balkans (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae, Limnephilidae).

Simon Vitecek1, Ana Previšić2, Mladen Kučinić2, Miklós Bálint3, Lujza Keresztes4, Johann Waringer1, Steffen U Pauls3, Hans Malicky5, Wolfram Graf6.   

Abstract

New species are described in the genera Wormaldia (Trichoptera, Philopotamidae) and Drusus (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae, Drusinae). Additionally, the larva of the new species Drususcrenophylax sp. n. is described, and a key provided to larval Drusus species of the bosnicus-group, in which the new species belongs. Observations on the threats to regional freshwater biodiversity and caddisfly endemism are discussed. The new species Wormaldiasarda sp. n. is an endemic of the Tyrrhenian island of Sardinia and differs most conspicuously from its congeners in the shape of segment X, which is trilobate in lateral view. The new species Drususcrenophylax sp. n. is a micro-endemic of the Western Balkans, and increases the endemism rate of Balkan Drusinae to 79% of 39 species. Compared to other Western Balkan Drusus, males of the new species are morphologically most similar to Drususdiscophorus Radovanovic and Drususvernonensis Malicky, but differ in the shape of superior and intermediate appendages. The females of Drususcrenophylax sp. n. are most similar to those of Drususvernonensis, but differ distinctly in the outline of segment X. Larvae of Drususcrenophylax sp. n. exhibit toothless mandibles, indicating a scraping grazing-feeding ecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caddisfly; Europe; Mediterranean; conservation; hydropower; larval key; taxonomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 25931956      PMCID: PMC4410158          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.496.9169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The Mediterranean area is a flora and fauna biodiversity hot-spot. The Tyrrhenian islands and the Balkans, in particular, are noteworthy for their high number of plant endemics (Médail and Quezél 1997, 1999; Nikolić et al. 2008; Fenu et al. 2010; Bacchetta et al. 2012), and mammal and invertebrate endemics (Holdhaus 1924, Vigne 1992, Muccedda et al. 2002, Griffiths et al. 2004, Grill et al. 2007). Freshwater biodiversity has recently become a focus of attention throughout Europe, including the Mediterranean region with the Western Balkans and Sardinia (e.g., di Sabatino 2003, Zakšek et al. 2009, Tierno de Figueroa et al. 2013, Klobučar et al. 2013, Weiss et al. 2014). The genus currently comprises 204 species (Morse 2014) of which 36 species occur in Europe (Malicky 2005, Graf et al. 2008). Most species are widely distributed, but also several apparently highly endemic species have been described (Graf et al. 2008, Martínez-Menéndez and González 2011). Aquatic stages of the genus, with few exceptions, prefer crenal and rhithral sections of alpine to lowland streams, are caseless and behave as passive filter feeders using characteristic nets (Graf et al. 2008). Species in the genus exhibit characteristic male genitalia, but also comparatively high variability, particularly of the phallic structures (Malicky 2004, Martínez-Menéndez and González 2011, Neu pers. comm.), resulting in the description of several subspecies. The genus is in the subfamily Banks, and comprises 84 species (Malicky 2004, 2005; Kučinić et al. 2011a; Oláh 2010, 2011; Oláh and Kovács 2013). Larvae of the group prefer eucrenal to epirhithral sections of cold alpine or montane streams and brooks. Feeding ecology of larvae is complex, and three different feeding guilds can be distinguished based on the shape of larval mandibles and leg setation: filtering carnivores, omnivorous shredders, and scraping grazers (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009). Taxonomic richness of is particularly high in the Western Balkans, including a high number of micro-endemics (Malicky 2004; Graf et al. 2008; Oláh 2010, 2011; Kučinić et al. 2011a, b; Oláh and Kovács 2013, Previšić et al. 2014a, b). In this paper we describe a new species of and a new grazer species, including a key to the hitherto known larval stages of the -group, in which sp. n. belongs.

Materials and methods

Adults were collected using sweep nets and immature stages by handpicking. Collected specimens were stored in 70% and 96% EthOH, for morphological and molecular analyses, respectively. Male and female genitalia were examined after being cleared in either KOH or lactic acid. Nomenclature of male genitalia of PageBreak McLachlan follows Nielsen (1957, for Pictet), nomenclature of male genitalia of follows Nielsen (1957, for Fabricius) using the simplifying terms “superior appendages” for the lateral processes of segment X (cerci sensu Snodgrass 1935), and “intermediate appendages” for the sclerite and the anterior process of segment X (paraproct sensu Snodgrass 1935). Nomenclature of larval morphological features follows Wiggins (1998) and Waringer and Graf (2011), nomenclature of primary setae and setal areas follows Wiggins (1998). Illustrations were prepared according to Thomson and Holzenthal (2010) in which pencil drawings made with a camera lucida are digitized, edited and inked in Adobe Illustrator (v. 16.0.4, Adobe Systems Inc.). Molecular genetic sequence data were used to support larval association and assess relationships to previously described species. DNA extraction and amplification of a 541-bp-long fragment of the mtCOI gene using standard primers (forward primer: Jerry, Simon et al. 1994, reverse primer: S20, Pauls et al. 2006) was performed as outlined by Pauls et al. (2008) and Previšić et al. (2009b). Sequences were edited manually using Geneious version R7 (http://www.geneious.com, Kearse et al. 2012) and aligned using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013). Sequences were deposited in GenBank under Accession nos: KC881524, KP793081–KP793089 (Table 1). Inter- and intraspecific genetic distances (uncorrected p-distances) were calculated in Mega 4.0.1 (Tamura et al. 2007).
Table 1.

Detailed list of specimens used for mtCOI analysis. Abbreviations: M adult male, F female; L larva; U unknown.

SpeciesLocalitySpecimen ID/StageAccession #Collectors
Drusus crenophylax44°32.932'N, 17°23.562'EfDsp4501M/MKP793082Dmitrović, Šukalo
Drusus crenophylax44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'EfDsp4502L/LKP793083Dmitrović, Šukalo
Drusus crenophylax44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'EfDsp4503L/LKP793081Dmitrović, Šukalo
Drusus crenophylax44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'EfDsp3401F/FKP793084Dmitrović, Šukalo
Drusus crenophylax44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'EfDsp3402F/FKP793085Dmitrović, Šukalo
Drusus vernonensis41°0.887'N, 21°10.448'EDdphPEIM1/MKC881524Kučinić, Graf
Drusus vernonensis41°0.887'N, 21°10.448'EDdphPEIM2/MKP793087Kučinić, Graf
Drusus vernonensis41°0.887'N, 21°10.448'EDdphPEIM3/MKP793086Kučinić, Graf
Drusus discophorusMacedonia, Jablanica Mts.fDds0110M/MKP793089Kučinić
Drusus discophorusMacedonia, Jablanica Mts.fDds0112F/FKP793088Kučinić
Detailed list of specimens used for mtCOI analysis. Abbreviations: M adult male, F female; L larva; U unknown.

Taxonomy

Graf & Malicky sp. n. http://zoobank.org/F02C5CF5-9043-463F-809B-FCD5D2B8FBD2

Material examined.

Holotype. 1 male pupa, holotype: Sardinia, Gola di Gorruppo; 40°11.122'N, 9°30.104'E; 350 m a.s.l.; 28.03.2001; leg. Monika Hess, Ulrich Heckes; currently in coll. W. Graf, will deposited in the Biologiezentrum des Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseums, Linz, Austria.

Type locality.

Italy, Sardinia.

Diagnosis.

Morphology of the male terminalia suggests placement of the new species in PageBreak. The species is unique in the European fauna, and easily differentiated from all other species by the combination of the following characters: (1) presence of median subtriangular protrusion in the distal half of the harpago, (2) membraneous dorsoproximal portion and trilobate lateral portions of segment X, and (3) distinct sclerotized structures visible on the invaginated phallus.

Description.

Adults (in pupa). Habitus dark, sclerites and tergites brown; cephalic and thoracic setal areas pale; cephalic, thoracic and abdominal setation dark brown; legs light brown, proximally darker; haustellum and intersegmental integument pale cream. Wings brown mottled with golden patches. Male maxillary palp 5-segmented. Spurformula 2–4–4 in males. Male genitalia (Fig. 1A–D). Segment IX in lateral view subrectangular, bulging anteriad; dorsal quarter reduced to a narrow transverse bridge, ventral 3/4ers broad (Fig. 1A). Segment X in lateral view trilobate: unpaired dorsal lobe strongly convex with a bicuspid apex, dorsoproximally membraneous; 1 lateromedian lobe, subovate, pointed on either side; 1 ventral lobe, posteriad, pointed on either side (Fig. 1A, B). Superior appendages suboval, curved dorsad in lateral view, flat with a rounded apex in dorsal and ventral view (Fig. 1A, C, D). Invaginated phallus terminally with a dorsal pair of sclerotized, laterad divergent tines and a ventral sclerotized plate; internally with 4 distinct tines (Fig. 1A, D). Coxopodite subovate in lateral view, ventrally with a sharp mediolaterad ridge (Fig. 1A, C). Harpago subovate in lateral view, in ventral view distally with a median subtriangular serrated protrusion flattened dorsoventrally (Fig. 1A, D).
Figure 1.

Male genitalia of sp. n. A right lateral view, intact B right lateral view, superior appendage removed C ventral view D dorsal view.

Male genitalia of sp. n. A right lateral view, intact B right lateral view, superior appendage removed C ventral view D dorsal view. Mature pupa (Fig. 2D–F). Mandibles tubular, dilated at the apex (Fig. 2E,F). Abdominal dorsal sclerites as in Fig. 2D.
Figure 2.

Pupal characteristics of sp. n., , and spp. A generalized pupal abdomen in dorsal view, depicting the position of the dorsal sclerites B dorsal sclerites of C dorsal sclerites of D dorsal sclerites of sp. n. E head of pupa in left lateral view F head of pupa in ventral view G pupal mandibles of in ventral view H pupal mandibles of in ventral view. Scale bars: 100 µm (B); 50 µm (C, D).

Pupal characteristics of sp. n., , and spp. A generalized pupal abdomen in dorsal view, depicting the position of the dorsal sclerites B dorsal sclerites of C dorsal sclerites of D dorsal sclerites of sp. n. E head of pupa in left lateral view F head of pupa in ventral view G pupal mandibles of in ventral view H pupal mandibles of in ventral view. Scale bars: 100 µm (B); 50 µm (C, D). Female and larva unknown.

Etymology.

The species epithet refers to the island of Sardinia, the type locality. Graf & Vitecek sp. n. http://zoobank.org/4FBB2D55-59BD-46AB-8E39-B34F2D892C79

Material.

Holotype. 1 male: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cvrcka river; 44°32.932'N 17°23.562'E; 393 m a.s.l.; 01.10.2014; leg. Dejan Dmitrović, Goran Šukalo; specimen identifier: fDsp4501M. Paratypes: 2 females: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Spring of Cvrcka river, Vilenjska vrela; 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E; 456 m a.s.l.; 12.09.2012; leg. Dejan Dmitrović; specimen identifiers: fDsp3401F, fDsp3402F. 4 males, 3 females, 19 larvae: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Spring of Cvrcka river, Vilenjska vrela; 44°33.003'N, 17°23.580'E 456 m a.s.l.; 12.09.2012; leg. Dejan Dmitrović, Goran Šukalo; specimen identifiers for 3 larvae: fDsp4502L, fDsp4503L, fDsp4504L. Holotype and paratypes currently in coll. W. Graf, will deposited in the Biologiezentrum des Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseums, Linz, Austria. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republika Srpska, Cvrcka River. Males of the new species are most similar to PageBreak Radovanovic and Malicky, but exhibit (1) subtriangular superior appendages in lateral view, (2) subtriangular, low tip of the intermediate appendage in lateral view, and (3) simple, rounded tips of intermediate appendages in caudal view. males have suboval superior appendages and a high round tip of the intermediate appendage in lateral view; males have round superior appendages in lateral view and trilobate tips of intermediate appendages in caudal view. Females of the new species show the reduced median lobe of the vaginal sclerite and high base of the lateral lobe of segment IX as typical for Balkan , and are most similar to , but exhibit (1) a sharp dorsal notch of segment X in lateral view, and (2) segment X with 2 round median lobes in dorsal view. females have a rounded dorsal outline of segment X and lack the median lobes of segment X. Larvae of the new species are most similar to Marinković-Gospodnetić and Marinković-Gospodnetić, but exhibit (1) a semicircular area dorsomedially on the pronotum anterior the pronotal ridge void of white recumbent setae, (2) lateral gills, and (3) a subtriangular pronotal ridge in lateral view. Larvae of have white recumbent setae covering the whole pronotum, and larvae of lack lateral gills and have an annular pronotal ridge. Adults. Habitus dark; sclerites and tergites brown; cephalic and thoracic setal areas pale; cephalic, thoracic and abdominal setation blond; legs light brown to fawn, proximally darker; haustellum and intersegmental integument pale, whitish. Wings smoky, with dark setae. Male maxillary palp 3-segmented. Forewing length 11–13.2 mm, spur formula 1–3–3 in males; forewing length 13–14.5 mm, spur formula 1–3–3 in females. Male genitalia (Fig. 3A–E). Tergite VIII dark brown, in dorsal view cranially distinctly incised, with lighter areas around fused alveoli; setation concentrated at laterocranial borders of spinate areas; spinate area as two ± triangular laterocaudal lobes medially connected by a band of spines, embracing a medial, indent less sclerotized area (translucent in cleared specimens) with scarce spines. Ninth abdominal segment (IX) ventrally wider than dorsally in caudal view; in lateral view medially with a sharp caudad protrusion and a ventral protrusion, embracing the base of the inferior appendices. Superior appendages in lateral view subtriangular, somewhat Y-shaped with a shorter dorsal and a longer ventral protrusion separated by a slight indentation. Intermediate appendages in lateral view blocky with 2 tips, the proximal sharp, the distal high, rounded, rough; in dorsal view the tips parallel, extending laterally: a bar-shaped, laterally rounded distal tip and a sharp proximal tip, separated by a rounded excision with round edges; in caudal view approximately triangular, tips rounded. Inferior appendages (gonopods sensu Snodgrass 1935) in lateral view proximally wide, medially slightly constricted with a slight dorsal triangular protrusion, curved dorsadly in the slender posterior third; in dorsal, ventral and caudal view proximal part laterad, distal part approximately straight in dorsoventral plane, curved dorsad; in caudal view tips distinctly slender; setal alveoli fused, creating a rugged, less sclerotized ventral area. Parameres simple, with a distinct medial thorn-like spine and 2 proximal spines in the proximal half.
Figure 3.

Genitalia of sp. n. A–E male genitalia: A right lateral view B paramere in right lateral view C ventral view D caudal view E dorsal view F–I female genitalia: F right lateral view G ventral view H caudal view I dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Genitalia of sp. n. A–E male genitalia: A right lateral view B paramere in right lateral view C ventral view D caudal view E dorsal view F–I female genitalia: F right lateral view G ventral view H caudal view I dorsal view. Scale bar: 1 mm. Female genitalia (Fig. 3F–I). Segment IX setation abundant, concentrated in the caudal half; lateral lobe of segment IX membraneous, in lateral view oblique triangular, the ventral edge about twice as long as the dorsal edge, with a dorsal sclerotized setose part protruding caudally; in dorsal and ventral view slender, projecting lateradly; in caudal view dorsal sclerotized setose part somewhat triangular. Segment X in lateral view with a proximal and a distal part, defined by a sharp dorsal notch; in dorsal view trapezoidal, with rounded shoulders, 2 small dorsal median lobes, and distally with 2 triangular, sharp-tipped lateral lobes, each with a lateral rounded setose and a small median rounded protrusion; ventrally unsclerotized, open. Supragenital plate in lateral view sinuously-edged quadrangular with a small, rounded dorsal protrusion, caudal line slightly indent; in ventral view quadrangular, in caudal view quadrangular, dorsally slightly wider than ventrally. Vulvar scale in lateral view triangular, rather straight, longer than the supragenital plate; in ventral view slender with 3 lobes: 2 lateral lobes, digitiform, roundly oval, straight; 1 median, short (reduced), of greater width than length: length approximately 1/6th of that of lateral lobes. Fifth instar larva (Fig. 4A–I). Head capsule hypognathous, finely granulated with a field of microspinules dorsal to each eye, dark brown dorsally, fading to yellow ventrally; 18 pairs of primary setae present: #1, 4, 6, 10, 12, 13 yellow and #6, 13 short, inconspicuous, the rest dark brown, long (Fig. 4A); antennae located on high carinae, each carina about as high as long, both strongly curved mediad (Fig. 4B); mandibles toothless. Pronotum dark brown, coarsely granulated; distinct medial ridge present, rounded, steeper anteriorly in lateral view; recumbent white setae present, but lacking in a semicircular area anterior the pronotal ridge (Fig. 4C); pronotal horn present. Mesonotum completely covered by 2 sclerites, dark brown, with darker apodemes; edges black; sa1 comprising 4–6 setae, sa2 and sa3 connected, comprising 28–34 setae in total on each sclerite (Fig. 4D). Metanotum with 3 pairs of sclerites: anteriomedian sclerites subtriangularly ovoid, dark brown with 11–19 setae; posteromedian sclerites rhomboid, pale brown, with 13–15 setae; lateral sclerites long, curved dorsally in lateral view, pale brown fading to yellow ventrally with a dark median spot and 21–25 setae (Fig. 4E). Legs yellow-light brown, dorsally and distally darker (Fig. 4F–H). Abdomen white (Fig. 4G), dorsal gills from II praesegmental position to VI praesegmental position, lateral gills from II praesegmental position to IV praesegmental position, ventral gills from II prasegmental position to VII postsegmental position; lateral line from last quarter of II to first quarter of VIII (Fig. 4I); abdomen I with 1 dorsal and 2 lateral protuberances, posterior sclerites absent on lateral protuberances, setal areas sa1–3 fused dorsally and ventrally (Fig. 4D, E), sternum bearing 2 setae with distinct basal plates; abdomen VIII with 2 long and 2–4 short posterodorsal setae on either side; abdomen IX with 1 posterodorsal seta on either side, dorsal sclerite IX semicircular, pale brown with 7 long and several shorter setae. Case simple, constructed of mineral particles.
Figure 4.

Larval characteristics of sp. n. A head, frontal view B head, left lateral view C pronotum dorsal view D meso- and metathorax with abdominal segment I, dorsal view E abdominal segments I-V, left lateral view F left thoracic leg I, frontal view G left thoracic leg II; frontal view H left thoracic leg III, frontal view; bottom, gill and lateral line diagram, positions of gills are depicted as black circles, position of lateral line bold.

Larval characteristics of sp. n. A head, frontal view B head, left lateral view C pronotum dorsal view D meso- and metathorax with abdominal segment I, dorsal view E abdominal segments I-V, left lateral view F left thoracic leg I, frontal view G left thoracic leg II; frontal view H left thoracic leg III, frontal view; bottom, gill and lateral line diagram, positions of gills are depicted as black circles, position of lateral line bold.

Molecular species delimitation and larval affiliation.

Analysis of the genetic distance of mtCOI between PageBreakPageBreak sp. n. and the in the adult stage morphologically most similar species, and , clearly supports the recognition of the new species. Uncorrected p-distances recorded in a fragment of the mtCOI gene (ranging from 2–8%; Fig. 5), agree with the interspecific distances commonly recorded in (e.g., Graf et al. 2005; Kučinić et al. 2011a; Previšić et al. 2014a, b) and other caddisfly families (e.g., ; Pauls et al. 2010). Also, all haplotypes of sp. n. adults were completely identical to another and those of undescribed -larvae collected at the locus typicus, enabling confident affiliation of larvae and adults of sp. n.
Figure 5.

Distance matrix (lower left) and colour heat map (upper right) showing uncorrected inter- and intraspecific p-distances of the partial mtCOI sequence (541 bp) between sp. n., and . For detailed information on the haplotypes, see Table 1.

Distance matrix (lower left) and colour heat map (upper right) showing uncorrected inter- and intraspecific p-distances of the partial mtCOI sequence (541 bp) between sp. n., and . For detailed information on the haplotypes, see Table 1.

Ecology and distribution.

species typically are members of crenal species communities, and mainly inhabit crenal sections of cold streams. Larval were collected at eucrenal sections of the Cvrcka River (Fig. 6A, B) and behave as epilithic grazers, as indicated by mandible morphology (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009). Based on regional collection data, we assume that the species is a micro-endemic restricted to the watershed of the Cvrcka river.
Figure 6.

Habitat of sp. n. at the type locality. A collection site of the larval paratypes B collection site of the male holotype.

Habitat of sp. n. at the type locality. A collection site of the larval paratypes B collection site of the male holotype. The species epithet is a compound name, combining κρηνον (‘well, spring, fountain’ in Ancient Greek) and φυλαξ (‘guard, keeper, protector’ in Ancient Greek), terms that reflect the high degree of niche specificity of species, the majority of which inhabit crenal sections of streams (Graf et al. 2008).

Key to larvae of the -group

have evolved into three distinct subclades reflecting feeding ecology of larvae (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009). The grazer clade sensu Pauls et al. 2008 represents the largest clade, comprising over 70 species in several subclades (Malicky 2004, 2005; Kučinić et al. 2011a; Oláh 2010, 2011; Oláh and Kovács 2013). Larvae of scraping grazers species characteristically develop toothless mandibles (Pauls et al. 2008, Graf et al. 2009, Waringer and Graf 2011). In the Western Balkans, the grazing -group represents a group of morphologically similar endemics and comprises according to Marinković-Gospodnetić (1976)  Klapálek, Marinković-Gospodnetić, Marinković-Gospodnetić, Radovanović, (Marinković-Gospodnetić), Marinković-Gospodnetić, (Marinković-Gospodnetić) and Marinković-Gospodnetić (Kučinić et al. 2011a). Larvae of the -group also develop, with the exception of (Kučinić et al. 2010), a field of microspinules close to each eye (Kučinić et al. 2011a, b; Waringer et al. 2015). Further, carinae of , , and are high and curved mediad. Larvae of sp. n. share those characters and can be integrated in the following dichotomous key (Waringer et al. 2015):

Discussion

Systematic significance of sp. n.

The Tyrrhenian islands and Sardinia in particular have been renowned for their relictual fauna and flora for a long time (Holdhaus 1924) and represent one of the Mediterranean biodiversity hotspots (Grill et al. 2007). sp. n. represents an addition to the distinct Sardinian biodiversity. As no species similar to sp. n. are recorded from neither northern Africa nor mainland Europe, it is likely that this species is restricted to Sardinia, as are several other species such as Curtis, Malicky or Tobias (Graf et al. 2008). However, the geological history and geographic proximity of the Tyrrhenian islands – Sardinia and Corsica in particular (Vigliotti et al. 1990) – suggest that some species may occur on both islands. For instance, Ulmer or Hagen occur also on Corsica, or other Mediterranean islands (Graf et al. 2008). The distinct apomorphic characters, particularly the modified segment X and the very different pupal characters (mandibles, dorsal abdominal sclerites; Fig. 2D–F), might warrant establishing a new genus for this species. The pupal characteristics alone are strikingly different from those of either PageBreak or (Lepneva 1964; Fig. 2). However, since pupae of only three species of are described (Nielsen 1942, Lepneva 1964) the range of genus-level pupal characters remains unknown. Further, modifications of segment X are common in southeast Asian species of (Malicky 2010). Tooth-like structures on segment X similar to the ones observed in sp. n. are present in species from Thailand (e.g., Malicky & Chantaramongkol, Malicky & Chantaramongkol, Malicky & Chantaramongkol), or Sulawesi ( Neboiss). Nevertheless, species with a phallus shaped as in sp. n. have not yet been described. Since the whole genus is in need of revision (Malicky 2005, Malicky unpubl. data), we refrain, in the interest of taxonomic stability, from creating a new genus.

Aquatic diversity of the Western Balkans under threat

Endemic freshwater species are particularly vulnerable to global change and (anthropogenic) habitat degradation (Hering et al. 2009, Tierno de Figueroa et al. 2010, Bálint et al. 2011, Conti et al. 2014). The Balkans is rich in apparently endemic freshwater species (Griffiths et al. 2004). Recent taxonomic efforts in the Western Balkans increased the number of endemic taxa to 31 of 39 described species (Previšić et al. 2014b, Vitecek et al. unpubl. data). Further, several endemic species of were recently described from the Western Balkans (Oláh et al. 2012, Kučinić et al. 2013) indicating the need for further systematic investigations on an underestimated diversity of southeastern Europe. The construction of hydropower dams in emerging economies is currently one of the greatest threats to freshwater biodiversity (Zarfl et al. 2014). Small hydropower plants fed by small cold-water mountain rivers such as the Cvrcka River are currently under construction throughout the Western Balkans (Freyhof 2012, Schwarz 2012), and gravely threaten the habitats that harbour endemic highland caddisflies such as (Previšić et al. 2014a, Vitecek et al. unpubl. data, this study), or species (Kučinić et al. 2013). The description of sp. n. highlights the importance of biodiversity research in southern Europe, and demonstrates that the currently prevailing energy policy will likely result in the loss of known and unknown biodiversity.
1Head with flat vertexDrusus bosnicus (Kučinić et al. in press)
Vertex evenly rounded2
2Pronotum with thin long, yellow setationDrusus radovanovici (fig. 17 in Kučinić et al. 2011a)
Pronotum without thin long, yellow setation3
3Pronotum with numerous short, white, recumbent setae4
Pronotum without numerous short, white, recumbent setaeDrusus septentrionis (figs 4, 5 in Kučinić et al. 2008)
4Dorsal pronotal hump smoothly roundedDrusus medianus (fig. 43 in Kučinić et al. 2010, figs 20–22 in Kučinić et al. 2011b)
Dorsal pronotal hump with distinct ridge5
5Anterior metanotal sclerites narrowly subtriangular (width / length ratio ≥ 2.0)Drusus vespertinus (Previšić et al. 2009a)
Anterior metanotal sclerites broadly subtriangular (width / length ratio < 2.0)6
6In lateral view, dorsal pronotal ridge annular, posterior section sharply descendingDrusus serbicus (Waringer et al. 2015)
In lateral view, posterior section of dorsal pronotal ridge gently descending7
7White recumbent setae cover the entire pronotumDrusus klapaleki (Kučinić et al. 2011b)
White recumbent setae lacking in a semicircular area anterior to the pronotal ridgeDrusus crenophylax sp. n.
  12 in total

1.  Phylogeography of the montane caddisfly Drusus discolor: evidence for multiple refugia and periglacial survival.

Authors:  Steffen U Pauls; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Peter Haase
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Joel Dudley; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Pleistocene divergence of Dinaric Drusus endemics (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) in multiple microrefugia within the Balkan Peninsula.

Authors:  Ana Previsić; Catherine Walton; Mladen Kucinić; Petar T Mitrikeski; Mladen Kerovec
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  The limits of cryptic diversity in groundwater: phylogeography of the cave shrimp Troglocaris anophthalmus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Atyidae).

Authors:  Valerija Zakšek; Boris Sket; Sanja Gottstein; Damjan Franjević; Peter Trontelj
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Cryptic diversity of caddisflies in the Balkans: the curious case of Ecclisopteryx species (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae).

Authors:  Ana Previšić; Wolfram Graf; Simon Vitecek; Mladen Kučinić; Miklós Bálint; Lujza Keresztes; Steffen U Pauls; Johann Waringer
Journal:  Arthropod Syst Phylogeny       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data.

Authors:  Matthew Kearse; Richard Moir; Amy Wilson; Steven Stones-Havas; Matthew Cheung; Shane Sturrock; Simon Buxton; Alex Cooper; Sidney Markowitz; Chris Duran; Tobias Thierer; Bruce Ashton; Peter Meintjes; Alexei Drummond
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Chaetopteryx bucari sp. n., a new species from the Chaetopteryx rugulosa group from Croatia (Insecta, Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) with molecular, taxonomic and ecological notes on the group.

Authors:  Mladen Kučinić; Ildikó Szivák; Steffen U Pauls; Miklós Bálint; Antun Delić; Ivan Vučković
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Larval morphology and phylogenetic position of Drusus balcanicus, Drusus botosaneanui, Drusus serbicus and Drusus tenellus (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae: Drusinae).

Authors:  Johann Waringer; Wolfram Graf; Miklós Bálint; Mladen Kučinić; Steffen U Pauls; Ana Previšić; Lujza Keresztes; Halil Ibrahimi; Ivana Živić; Katarina Bjelanović; Vladimir Krpač; Simon Vitecek
Journal:  Eur J Entomol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.225

10.  Grazers, shredders and filtering carnivores--the evolution of feeding ecology in Drusinae (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae): insights from a molecular phylogeny.

Authors:  Steffen U Pauls; Wolfram Graf; Peter Haase; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Johann Waringer
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 4.286

View more
  5 in total

1.  Morphological features of larvae of Drusus plicatus Radovanović (Insecta, Trichoptera) from the Republic of Macedonia with molecular, ecological, ethological, and distributional notes.

Authors:  Mladen Kučinić; Ana Previšić; Iva Mihoci; Vladimir Krpač; Ivana Živić; Katarina Stojanović; Ana Mrnjavčić Vojvoda; Luka Katušić
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  Integrative taxonomy by molecular species delimitation: multi-locus data corroborate a new species of Balkan Drusinae micro-endemics.

Authors:  Simon Vitecek; Mladen Kučinić; Ana Previšić; Ivana Živić; Katarina Stojanović; Lujza Keresztes; Miklós Bálint; Felicitas Hoppeler; Johann Waringer; Wolfram Graf; Steffen U Pauls
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Larval morphology of the Western Balkans endemic caddisflies Drusus krusniki Malicky 1981, D. vernonensis Malicky 1989, and D. vespertinus Marinković 1976 (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae, Drusinae).

Authors:  Johann Waringer; Ana Previšić; Mladen Kučinić; Wolfram Graf; Simon Vitecek; Lujza Keresztes; Miklós Bálint; Steffen U Pauls
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.091

4.  Description of two new filtering carnivore Drusus species (Limnephilidae, Drusinae) from the Western Balkans.

Authors:  Simon Vitecek; Mladen Kučinić; János Oláh; Ana Previšić; Miklós Bálint; Lujza Keresztes; Johann Waringer; Steffen U Pauls; Wolfram Graf
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  Drusus sharrensis sp. n. (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae), a new species from Sharr National Park in Kosovo, with molecular and ecological notes.

Authors:  Halil Ibrahimi; Simon Vitecek; Ana Previšić; Mladen Kučinić; Wolfram Graf; Miklós Balint; Lujza Keresztes; Steffen U Pauls
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.