Literature DB >> 25931674

Feasibility of a pedometer-based walking program for survivors of breast and head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy.

Pantea Amin Javaheri1, Cheryl Nekolaichuk2, Robert Haennel3, Matthew B Parliament4, Margaret L McNeely5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a pedometer-based walking program for people with breast cancer and head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiation therapy treatment.
METHODS: Participants were given a pedometer and prescribed a home-based walking program that included an individualized weekly step-count goal during the 3- to 5-week course of radiation therapy. Feasibility was determined by calculating recruitment rate, completion rate, and rate of adherence. Secondary outcomes included 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, step count, physical activity level, and psychological outcomes of depression, happiness, self-esteem, and sleep quality.
RESULTS: A total of 21 participants were recruited. All participants completed the study; adherence to prescribed step counts was 91% at follow-up. Analysis found a significant improvement in happiness, as measured by the Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (mean difference 0.3, p=0.003), and a borderline significant improvement in 6MWT distance (mean difference 35 m, p=0.008).
CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a pedometer-based walking program for survivors of breast cancer and HNC undergoing radiation therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; head and neck cancer; physical activity; radiation therapy; walking

Year:  2015        PMID: 25931674      PMCID: PMC4407117          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2014-24O

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  34 in total

1.  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Validation of a 3-factor scoring model for the Pittsburgh sleep quality index in older adults.

Authors:  Jason C Cole; Sarosh J Motivala; Daniel J Buysse; Michael N Oxman; Myron J Levin; Michael R Irwin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  The evolving definition of "sedentary".

Authors:  Russell R Pate; Jennifer R O'Neill; Felipe Lobelo
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 4.  Physical activity among cancer survivors: a literature review.

Authors:  Ewa A Szymlek-Gay; Rosalina Richards; Richard Egan
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2011-06-24

Review 5.  Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Ruud Knols; Neil K Aaronson; Daniel Uebelhart; Jaap Fransen; Geert Aufdemkampe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Effects of exercise on fatigue, physical functioning, and emotional distress during radiation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  V Mock; K H Dow; C J Meares; P M Grimm; J A Dienemann; M E Haisfield-Wolfe; W Quitasol; S Mitchell; A Chakravarthy; I Gage
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise.

Authors:  Carol Ewing Garber; Bryan Blissmer; Michael R Deschenes; Barry A Franklin; Michael J Lamonte; I-Min Lee; David C Nieman; David P Swain
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.

Authors:  V Mor; L Laliberte; J N Morris; M Wiemann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Physical activity in patients with COPD.

Authors:  H Watz; B Waschki; T Meyer; H Magnussen
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Fong; Judy W C Ho; Bryant P H Hui; Antoinette M Lee; Duncan J Macfarlane; Sharron S K Leung; Ester Cerin; Wynnie Y Y Chan; Ivy P F Leung; Sharon H S Lam; Aliki J Taylor; Kar-keung Cheng
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-30
View more
  5 in total

1.  Prescribing fitness apps for people with cancer: a preliminary assessment of content and quality of commercially available apps.

Authors:  R Martín Payo; J Harris; J Armes
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 2.  Promise of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Oncology Practice.

Authors:  Muhammad S Beg; Arjun Gupta; Tyler Stewart; Chad D Rethorst
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  CanWalk: a feasibility study with embedded randomised controlled trial pilot of a walking intervention for people with recurrent or metastatic cancer.

Authors:  Vicki Tsianakas; Jenny Harris; Emma Ream; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Arnie Purushotham; Lorelei Mucci; James S A Green; Jacquetta Fewster; Jo Armes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Tracking steps in oncology: the time is now.

Authors:  Juhi M Purswani; Nitin Ohri; Colin Champ
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Acceptance of physical activity monitoring in cancer patients during radiotherapy, the GIROfit phase 2 pilot trial.

Authors:  S Boeke; F Hauth; S G Fischer; H Lautenbacher; V Bizu; D Zips; C Gani
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.