Literature DB >> 25929549

The senses of active and passive forces at the human ankle joint.

G Savage1, T J Allen, U Proske.   

Abstract

The traditional view of the neural basis for the sense of muscle force is that it is generated at least in part within the brain. Recently it has been proposed that force sensations do not arise entirely centrally and that there is a contribution from peripheral receptors within the contracting muscle. Evidence comes from experiments on thumb flexor and elbow flexor muscles. Here we have studied the sense of force in plantar flexor muscles of the human ankle, looking for further evidence for such a mechanism. The active angle-torque curve was measured for muscles of both legs, and for each muscle, ankle angles were identified on the ascending and descending limbs of the curve where active forces were similar. In a plantar flexion force matching task, subjects were asked to match the force in one foot, generated on the ascending limb of the curve, with force in the other foot, generated on the descending limb. It was hypothesised that despite active forces being similar, the sensation generated in the more stretched muscle should be greater because of the contribution from its peripheral stretch receptors, leading to an overestimation of the force in the stretched muscle. It was found that provided that the comparison was between active forces, there was no difference in the forces generated by the two legs, supporting the central hypothesis for the sense of force. When total forces were matched, including a component of passive force due to muscle stretch, subjects seemed to ignore the passive component. Yet subjects had an acute sense of passive force, provided that the muscles remained relaxed. It was concluded that subjects had two senses, a sense of active force, generated centrally, and a sense of passive force, or perhaps muscle stretch, generated within the muscle itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25929549     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4287-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation.

Authors:  Sukhwinder S Shergill; Paul M Bays; Chris D Frith; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Changes in passive tension after stretch of unexercised and eccentrically exercised human plantarflexor muscles.

Authors:  Simone Reisman; Trevor J Allen; Uwe Proske
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Kinesthetic sensibility.

Authors:  D I McCloskey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man.

Authors:  S C Gandevia; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  A quantitative analysis of sensations of tension and of kinaesthesia in man. Evidence for a peripherally originating muscular sense and for a sense of effort.

Authors:  P E Roland; H Ladegaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  The fusimotor and reafferent origin of the sense of force and weight.

Authors:  Billy L Luu; Brian L Day; Jonathan D Cole; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint.

Authors:  Jack Brooks; Trevor J Allen; Uwe Proske
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The responses of secondary endings of cat soleus muscle spindles to succinyl choline.

Authors:  A Taylor; D L Morgan; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Relationship between Joint Position Sense, Force Sense, and Muscle Strength and the Impact of Gymnastic Training on Proprioception.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Niespodziński; Andrzej Kochanowicz; Jan Mieszkowski; Elżbieta Piskorska; Małgorzata Żychowska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Interaction between position sense and force control in bimanual tasks.

Authors:  Giulia Ballardini; Valentina Ponassi; Elisa Galofaro; Giorgio Carlini; Francesca Marini; Laura Pellegrino; Pietro Morasso; Maura Casadio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Finger Posture and Finger Load are Perceived Independently.

Authors:  Brendan Prendergast; Jack Brooks; James M Goodman; Maria Boyarinova; Jeremy E Winberry; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Diverse and complex muscle spindle afferent firing properties emerge from multiscale muscle mechanics.

Authors:  Kyle P Blum; Kenneth S Campbell; Brian C Horslen; Paul Nardelli; Stephen N Housley; Timothy C Cope; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Age-related deficit in a bimanual joint position matching task is amplitude dependent.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.