Literature DB >> 23525562

The senses of force and heaviness at the human elbow joint.

Jack Brooks1, Trevor J Allen, Uwe Proske.   

Abstract

The present-day view of the neural basis for the senses of muscle force and heaviness is that they are generated centrally, within the brain, from copies of motor commands. A corollary of the motor discharge generates a sense of effort which underlies these sensations. In recent experiments on force and heaviness sensations using thumb flexor muscles, a rather different explanation has been invoked: Subjects were proposed to rely predominantly on inputs of a peripheral origin, in particular, the signals of muscle spindles. The present experiments have been carried out at the elbow joint to determine whether these new ideas apply more widely. The effects of fatigue of elbow flexor muscles have been studied in force and heaviness matching tasks using three exercise regimes, a sustained maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), a maintained contraction of 35 % MVC, and a maintained contraction of 35 % MVC combined with muscle vibration at 80 Hz. In force-matching experiments, subjects were required to contract both arms and while the reference arm generated the target force under visual control, it was matched by the indicator arm without visual feedback. During the 100 % MVC exercise, force in the exercising reference arm fell rapidly to almost a half of its original value over 90 s while force in the indicator did not fall, leading to a significant overestimation of the reference force. During the 35 % MVC exercise, subjects also overestimated the reference force and this persisted at 5 and 10 min after the exercise. When 35 % MVC was combined with vibration, the amount by which the indicator arm overestimated the reference force was significantly reduced. In heaviness matching experiments, subjects could move their arms through a small range. The reference arm was loaded with a weight, and weights were added or removed from the indicator until heaviness felt the same in the two arms. There was a small, but significant fall in the matching weight used after 100 % MVC exercise, that is, the weight held by the fatigued arm felt lighter. The 35 % exercise did not alter heaviness sensation while 35 % MVC exercise with vibration led to a significant reduction in perceived heaviness. To conclude, while the results of these experiments on elbow flexors are not as clear cut as for thumb flexors, the central effort hypothesis falls short, in a number of respects in explaining the data which are able to be interpreted in terms of a peripheral afferent contribution to the senses of force and heaviness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23525562     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3476-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Vibration sensitivity of human muscle spindles and Golgi tendon organs.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Lower limb force production and bilateral force asymmetries are based on sense of effort.

Authors:  Ann M Simon; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The responses of Golgi tendon organs to stimulation of different combinations of motor units.

Authors:  J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Sense of effort determines lower limb force production during dynamic movement in individuals with poststroke hemiparesis.

Authors:  Ann M Simon; Brian M Kelly; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position.

Authors:  F J Clark; R C Burgess; J W Chapin; W T Lipscomb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Blockade of intrafusal neuromuscular junctions of cat muscle spindles with gallamine.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; D L Morgan; J E Gregory; U Proske
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  Proprioceptive movement illusions due to prolonged stimulation: reversals and aftereffects.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Janette L Smith; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  The senses of active and passive forces at the human ankle joint.

Authors:  G Savage; T J Allen; U Proske
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Muscle spindle thixotropy affects force perception through afferent-induced facilitation of the motor pathways as revealed by the Kohnstamm effect.

Authors:  Florian Monjo; Nicolas Forestier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The sensory origin of the sense of effort is context-dependent.

Authors:  Florian Monjo; Jonathan Shemmell; Nicolas Forestier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Proprioceptive afferents differentially contribute to effortful perception of object heaviness and length.

Authors:  Madhur Mangalam; Nisarg Desai; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The Influence of External Forces on Wrist Proprioception.

Authors:  Francesca Marini; Sara Contu; Chris W Antuvan; Pietro Morasso; Lorenzo Masia
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Relationship between Joint Position Sense, Force Sense, and Muscle Strength and the Impact of Gymnastic Training on Proprioception.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Niespodziński; Andrzej Kochanowicz; Jan Mieszkowski; Elżbieta Piskorska; Małgorzata Żychowska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Fatigue induces long-lasting detrimental changes in motor-skill learning.

Authors:  Meret Branscheidt; Panagiotis Kassavetis; Manuel Anaya; Davis Rogers; Han Debra Huang; Martin A Lindquist; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Force perceptual bias caused by muscle activity in unimanual steering.

Authors:  Yusuke Kishishita; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Yuichi Kurita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interaction between position sense and force control in bimanual tasks.

Authors:  Giulia Ballardini; Valentina Ponassi; Elisa Galofaro; Giorgio Carlini; Francesca Marini; Laura Pellegrino; Pietro Morasso; Maura Casadio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The Neurobiology of Pathological Fatigue: New Models, New Questions.

Authors:  Annapoorna Kuppuswamy
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 7.235

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.