| Literature DB >> 25928412 |
Siana N Mtatiro1,2,3,4, Josephine Mgaya5, Tarjinder Singh6, Harvest Mariki7, Helen Rooks8, Deogratius Soka9, Bruno Mmbando10,11, Swee Lay Thein12, Jeffrey C Barrett13, Julie Makani14, Sharon E Cox15,16, Stephan Menzel17,18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Common genetic variants residing near upstream regulatory elements for MYB, the gene encoding transcription factor cMYB, promote the persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) into adulthood. While they have no consequences in healthy individuals, high HbF levels have major clinical benefits in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) or β thalassemia. Here, we present our detailed investigation of HBS1L-MYB intergenic polymorphism block 2 (HMIP-2), the central component of the complex quantitative-trait locus upstream of MYB, in 1,022 individuals with SCD in Tanzania.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25928412 PMCID: PMC4422446 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-015-0148-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Figure 1Association of common genetic variation with HbF levels across the intergenic region on chromosome 6q23.3. Shown are LOP (−log10 [P-value]) scores for 1,022 patients, tested for association of ln[%HbF] with 109 common variants from a combination of Illumina Human Omnichip 2.5 data and PCR-based genotyping. A: Genetic association is present over the entire interval, but reaches genome-wide significance only at HMIP-2, whereas the other two LD blocks detected in Europeans (HMIP-1 and HMIP-3,[8]) display only low-level association in our dataset. B: HbF association at HMIP-2. The six SNPs showing strong association are indicated. In addition to un-conditioned analysis (black dots), the presence two partially independent association signals (sub-loci HMIP-2A and HMIP-32B) is shown by conditioning analysis on rs66650371 (tagging HMIP-2A, black diamonds) and rs9494145 (tagging HMIP-2B, open diamonds, see also Table 1).
Association of variants with fetal-hemoglobin levels (ln[HbF%]) in Tanzanian patients with SCA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 135,411,228 | T → C | 0.01 | 0.78 | 2.02x 10−4 | 0.17 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.02 | −0.09 | 0.71 | |
|
| 135,412,636 | T → C | 0.18 | −0.16 | 3.74x 10−4 | −0.14 | 1.28x 10−3 | −0.13 | 3.35x 10−3 | −0.12 | 6.07x 10−3 | |
|
| 135,414,850 | G → A | 0.21 | −0.16 | 1.65x 10−4 | −0.15 | 4.85x 10−4 | −0.13 | 1.79x 10−3 | −0.13 | 2.68x 10−3 | |
|
| 135,415,004 | C → T | 0.11 | 0.15 | 6.84x 10−3 | 0.15 | 5.04X 10−3 | 0.17 | 1.73x 10−3 | 0.17 | 1.68x 10−3 | |
|
| 135,417,460 | G → T | 0.19 | −0.16 | 1.87x 10−4 | −0.15 | 7.52x 10−4 | −0.14 | 1.78x 10−3 | −0.13 | 3.58x 10−3 | |
|
|
| 135,418,635 | I → D | 0.02 | 0.69 | 4.06 x 10−8 | 0.59 | 3.94x 10−6 | ||||
|
|
| 135,419,018 | T → C | 0.02 | 0.63 | 3.65 x 10−7 | 0.14 | 0.6 | 0.54 | 1.87x 10−5 | 0.13 | 0.61 |
|
| 135,419,038 | I → D | 0.14 | 0.12 | 1.36x 10−2 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.26 | |
|
|
| 135,419,042 | G → A | 0.02 | 0.69 | 5.07 x 10−8 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 0.61 | 2.44x 10−6 | 0.37 | 0.16 |
|
| 135,423,412 | G → A | 0.13 | −0.19 | 3.09x 10−4 | −0.18 | 5.22x 10−4 | −0.17 | 1.11x 10−3 | −0.16 | 1.37x 10−3 | |
|
|
| 135,426,573 | A → G | 0.05 | 0.30 | 1.53x 10−4 | 0.23 | 4.06x 10−3 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.35 |
|
|
| 135,427,159 | T → C | 0.03 | 0.48 | 1.11x 10−6 | 0.37 | 2.76x 10−4 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.22 |
|
|
| 135,427,817 | G → A | 0.03 | 0.49 | 1.57x 10−6 | 0.36 | 6.51x 10−4 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.28 |
|
| 135,432,061 | A → G | 0.34 | −0.10 | 8.67x 10−3 | −0.09 | 0.01 | −0.06 | 0.12 | −0.06 | 0.11 | |
|
|
| 135,432,552 | T → C | 0.05 | 0.38 | 4.97 x 10−7 | 0.31 | 3.45x 10−5 | ||||
|
| 135,435,171 | G → A | 0.39 | −0.11 | 1.74x 10−3 | −0.11 | 2.77x 10−3 | −0.08 | 0.04 | −0.08 | 0.04 | |
|
| 135,443,212 | A → G | 0.33 | 0.09 | 1.44x 10−2 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 0.54 | |
|
| 135,451,580 | C → T | 0.15 | −0.12 | 1.25x 10−2 | −0.11 | 0.02 | −0.10 | 0.04 | −0.09 | 0.06 | |
|
| 135,454,027 | C → A | 0.49 | 0.11 | 2.35x 10−3 | 0.09 | 6.64x 10−3 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.09 |
linear regression analysis: *conditioned for rs66650371, **conditioned on rs9494145, ***conditioned on rs66650371and rs9494145. (Residual association extends upstream of HMIP-2 and overlaps with the previously reported (Thein et al., PNAS 2007) HMIP-1 signal.).
The chromosomal position is given in hg19 coordinates, derived using UCSC Genome Browser version February 2009.
MAF: Minor allele frequency of the patient cohort; I: inserted allele, D: deleted allele (Δ ‘TAY’). ß, the un-standardized regression co-efficient is given as a measure of the effect of the allele change on ln[%HbF].
Shown are all directly genotyped markers with nominally significant association at p < 0.01.
Figure 2African-specific association with HbF at in Tanzanian SCD patients. Association analysis was performed with the same individuals as in Figure 1, but 15 patients with Eurasian-type high-HbF haplotypes (‘A – B’, carrying the ancestry-informative allele rs1376090-C) were excluded. Data for 54 markers imputed from 1000 Genomes YRI (Yoruba, Ibadan, Nigeria) sequence were added to the analysis. While the exclusion of selected individuals resulted in a weaker overall association signal, the potential to map African-specific variants at higher resolution was considered more important at this stage. Association scores are shown; unconditioned (black dots) and conditioned on the first three principal components derived from genome-wide SNP data (open circles) [25]. Shown also is the location of the conserved MYB upstream regulatory elements −71 and −63 [13].
Figure 3haplotypes detected in Tanzanian SCD patients. Nine critical variants at HMIP-2 were used to investigate haplotypes present at the locus (alignment by Phase v. 2.1). Haplotypes were assigned to the principal clades described previously [18], dependent on whether they contain HbF-increasing alleles (shaded in gray) at HMIP-2A (capital ‘A’) or HMIP-2B (capital ‘B’). a-b: ancestral haplotype present in all human populations, composed entirely of low-HbF associated alleles; A-b: HbF increasing alleles at HMIP-2A, but lacking the European/Asian-specific allele rs9376090-C; a-B: a-B1: one HbF-increasing allele at HMIP-2B, rs4895441-G, a-B2: HbF-increasing alleles across HMIP-2B; a-B3: two HbF-increasing alleles at HMIP-2B, rs9494145-C and rs9483788-C, A-B: Eurasian haplotype, HbF-increasing alleles across all of HMIP-2; Rare haplotypes (frequency < 0.5%) are not shown. *imputed
Figure 4HbF levels according to haplotype combination. %HbF of total hemoglobin was measured by HPLC in patients carrying one copy of the ancestral haplotype, with diverse haplotypes on the sister chromosome. Boxes show median and inter-quartile range. Relative effects of these haplotypes are shown in Table 2.
Relative effects of haplotypes on the ln[HbF%] trait
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a-B1 vs. a-b | 0.029 | −0.35 | 0.40 | 1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A-B vs. a-b | 0.638 | −0.10 | 1.38 | 0.13 |
| a-B1 vs. a-B2 | −0.401 | −0.10 | 0.90 | 0.20 |
| a-B1 vs. a-B3 | −0.303 | −0.79 | 0.18 | 0.47 |
| a-B2 vs. a-B3 | 0.098 | −0.37 | 0.56 | 0.99 |
| a-B1 vs. A-b | −0.607 | −1.25 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| a-B2 vs. A-b | −0.205 | −0.84 | 0.43 | 0.94 |
| a-B3 vs. A-b | −0.304 | −0.92 | 0.32 | 0.73 |
| A-B vs. A-b | 0.002 | −0.91 | 0.91 | 1.00 |
| a-B1 vs. A-B | −0.609 | −1.43 | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| a-B2 vs. A-B | −0.208 | −1.02 | 0.60 | 0.98 |
| a-B3 vs. A-B | −0.306 | −1.10 | 0.49 | 0.88 |
“Difference” represents the difference in effect size between the two haplotypes on log-transformed HbF levels; negative difference values indicates that the effect size of the second haplotype is bigger than that of the first. ‘lower’ and ‘upper’ represent boundaries for family-wise 95% confidence intervals. ‘p adjusted’ is the P-value adjusted for age, sex as well as multiple testing.
Three haplotypes (shown in bold) have significant HbF-boosting effects at the 0.05 level.