CONTEXT: Metastatic metaplastic breast carcinoma (MPBC) is an uncommon, but aggressive, tumor resistant to conventional chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To learn whether next-generation sequencing could identify potential targets of therapy for patients with relapsed and metastatic MPBC. DESIGN: Hybridization capture of 3769 exons from 236 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 19 genes commonly rearranged in cancer was applied to a minimum of 50 ng of DNA extracted from 20 MPBC formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens and sequenced to high uniform coverage. RESULTS: The 20 patients with MPBC had a median age of 62 years (range, 42-86 years). There were 9 squamous (45%), 9 chondroid (45%), and 2 spindle cell (10%) MPBCs, all of which were high grade. Ninety-three genomic alterations were identified, (range, 1-11) with 19 of the 20 cases (95%) harboring an alteration that could potentially lead to a targeted treatment option. The most-common alterations were in TP53 (n = 69; 75%), PIK3CA (n = 37; 40%), MYC (n = 28; 30%), MLL2 (n = 28; 30%), PTEN (n = 23; 25%), CDKN2A/B (n = 19; 20%), CCND3 (n = 14; 15%), CCNE1 (n = 9; 10%), EGFR (n = 9; 10%), and KDM6A (n = 9; 10%); AKT3, CCND1, CCND2, CDK4, FBXW7, FGFR1, HRAS, NF1, PIK3R1, and SRC were each altered in a single case. All 16 MPBCs (100%) that were negative for ERBB2 (HER2) overexpression by immunohistochemistry and/or ERBB2 (HER2) amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization were also uniformly (100%) negative for ERBB2 amplification by next-generation sequencing-based copy-number assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing can identify clinically meaningful alterations that have the potential to guide targeted treatment decisions in most patients with metastatic MPBC.
CONTEXT: Metastatic metaplastic breast carcinoma (MPBC) is an uncommon, but aggressive, tumor resistant to conventional chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To learn whether next-generation sequencing could identify potential targets of therapy for patients with relapsed and metastatic MPBC. DESIGN: Hybridization capture of 3769 exons from 236 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 19 genes commonly rearranged in cancer was applied to a minimum of 50 ng of DNA extracted from 20 MPBCformalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens and sequenced to high uniform coverage. RESULTS: The 20 patients with MPBC had a median age of 62 years (range, 42-86 years). There were 9 squamous (45%), 9 chondroid (45%), and 2 spindle cell (10%) MPBCs, all of which were high grade. Ninety-three genomic alterations were identified, (range, 1-11) with 19 of the 20 cases (95%) harboring an alteration that could potentially lead to a targeted treatment option. The most-common alterations were in TP53 (n = 69; 75%), PIK3CA (n = 37; 40%), MYC (n = 28; 30%), MLL2 (n = 28; 30%), PTEN (n = 23; 25%), CDKN2A/B (n = 19; 20%), CCND3 (n = 14; 15%), CCNE1 (n = 9; 10%), EGFR (n = 9; 10%), and KDM6A (n = 9; 10%); AKT3, CCND1, CCND2, CDK4, FBXW7, FGFR1, HRAS, NF1, PIK3R1, and SRC were each altered in a single case. All 16 MPBCs (100%) that were negative for ERBB2 (HER2) overexpression by immunohistochemistry and/or ERBB2 (HER2) amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization were also uniformly (100%) negative for ERBB2 amplification by next-generation sequencing-based copy-number assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing can identify clinically meaningful alterations that have the potential to guide targeted treatment decisions in most patients with metastatic MPBC.
Authors: Vinothini Govindarajah; Yuet-Kin Leung; Jun Ying; Robin Gear; Robert L Bornschein; Mario Medvedovic; Shuk-Mei Ho Journal: J Nutr Biochem Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Clinton Yam; Nour Abuhadra; Ryan Sun; Beatriz E Adrada; Qing-Qing Ding; Jason B White; Elizabeth E Ravenberg; Alyson R Clayborn; Vicente Valero; Debu Tripathy; Senthilkumar Damodaran; Banu K Arun; Jennifer K Litton; Naoto T Ueno; Rashmi K Murthy; Bora Lim; Luis Baez; Xiaoxian Li; Aman U Buzdar; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Alistair M Thompson; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gaiane M Rauch; Rosalind P Candelaria; Lei Huo; Stacy L Moulder; Jeffrey T Chang Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Lon Phan; Jeffrey Hsu; Le Quang Minh Tri; Michaela Willi; Tamer Mansour; Yan Kai; John Garner; John Lopez; Ben Busby Journal: F1000Res Date: 2016-04-13
Authors: Nike Beaubier; Robert Tell; Robert Huether; Martin Bontrager; Stephen Bush; Jerod Parsons; Kaanan Shah; Tim Baker; Gene Selkov; Tim Taxter; Amber Thomas; Sam Bettis; Aly Khan; Denise Lau; Christina Lee; Matthew Barber; Marcin Cieslik; Casey Frankenberger; Amy Franzen; Ali Weiner; Gary Palmer; Robert Lonigro; Dan Robinson; Yi-Mi Wu; Xuhong Cao; Eric Lefkofsky; Arul Chinnaiyan; Kevin P White Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-05-25