Literature DB >> 25926694

Night-time lighting alters the composition of marine epifaunal communities.

Thomas W Davies1, Matthew Coleman2, Katherine M Griffith2, Stuart R Jenkins2.   

Abstract

Marine benthic communities face multiple anthropogenic pressures that compromise the future of some of the most biodiverse and functionally important ecosystems in the world. Yet one of the pressures these ecosystems face, night-time lighting, remains unstudied. Light is an important cue in guiding the settlement of invertebrate larvae, and altering natural regimes of nocturnal illumination could modify patterns of recruitment among sessile epifauna. We present the first evidence of night-time lighting changing the composition of temperate epifaunal marine invertebrate communities. Illuminating settlement surfaces with white light-emitting diode lighting at night, to levels experienced by these communities locally, both inhibited and encouraged the colonization of 39% of the taxa analysed, including three sessile and two mobile species. Our results indicate that ecological light pollution from coastal development, shipping and offshore infrastructure could be changing the composition of marine epifaunal communities.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  anthropogenic disturbance; artificial light pollution; epifaunal communities; larval recruitment; light-emitting diodes; marine ecosystems

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25926694      PMCID: PMC4424621          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  6 in total

1.  Light-induced bird strikes on vessels in Southwest Greenland.

Authors:  Flemming Ravn Merkel; Kasper Lambert Johansen
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds.

Authors:  Bart Kempenaers; Pernilla Borgström; Peter Loës; Emmi Schlicht; Mihai Valcu
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Shading facilitates sessile invertebrate dominance in the rocky subtidal Gulf of Maine.

Authors:  Robert J Miller; Ron J Etter
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Artificial light pollution: are shifting spectral signatures changing the balance of species interactions?

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Richard Inger; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Cascading effects of artificial light at night: resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem.

Authors:  Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; David Cruse; Richard Inger; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

  6 in total
  12 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Enric Frago; Rachel Kehoe; Christophe Patterson; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Artificial light at night causes reproductive failure in clownfish.

Authors:  Emily K Fobert; Karen Burke da Silva; Stephen E Swearer
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Artificial light at night decreases metamorphic duration and juvenile growth in a widespread amphibian.

Authors:  Kacey L Dananay; Michael F Benard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Artificial light at night as an environmental pollutant: An integrative approach across taxa, biological functions, and scientific disciplines.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-10

6.  Wavelength-dependent effects of artificial light at night on phytoplankton growth and community structure.

Authors:  Christina Diamantopoulou; Eleni Christoforou; Davide M Dominoni; Eirini Kaiserli; Jakub Czyzewski; Nosrat Mirzai; Sofie Spatharis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Use of an Autonomous Surface Vehicle reveals small-scale diel vertical migrations of zooplankton and susceptibility to light pollution under low solar irradiance.

Authors:  Martin Ludvigsen; Jørgen Berge; Maxime Geoffroy; Jonathan H Cohen; Pedro R De La Torre; Stein M Nornes; Hanumant Singh; Asgeir J Sørensen; Malin Daase; Geir Johnsen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  The spectral and spatial distribution of light pollution in the waters of the northern Gulf of Aqaba (Eilat).

Authors:  Raz Tamir; Amit Lerner; Carynelisa Haspel; Zvy Dubinsky; David Iluz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Biologically important artificial light at night on the seafloor.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; David McKee; James Fishwick; Svenja Tidau; Tim Smyth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  How ecological communities respond to artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.