| Literature DB >> 25926596 |
Richard B Frobell1, Harald P Roos1, Ewa M Roos2, Frank W Roemer3, Jonas Ranstam1, L Stefan Lohmander4.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: In young active adults with an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, do patient reported or radiographic outcomes after five years differ between those treated with rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction and those treated with rehabilitation and optional delayed ACL reconstruction? SUMMARY ANSWER: At five years, patients assigned to rehabilitation plus early ACL reconstruction did not differ significantly in patient reported or radiographic outcomes from those assigned to initial rehabilitation with the option of having a later reconstruction if needed. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The relative efficacy of surgical reconstruction and rehabilitation for short and long term outcomes of ACL rupture is debated. Clinicians and young active adult patients should consider rehabilitation as a primary treatment option following an acute ACL tear. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25926596 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-f232rep
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Sports Med ISSN: 0306-3674 Impact factor: 13.800