Literature DB >> 32566380

PATIENTS FOCUS ON PERFORMANCE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, KNEE STABILITY AND ADVICE FROM CLINICIANS WHEN MAKING DECISIONS CONCERNING THE TREATMENT OF THEIR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY.

Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts, Joanna Kvist, Anne Fältström, Sofi Sonesson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When deciding medical treatment, patients' perspectives are important. There is limited knowledge about patients' views when choosing non-operative treatment or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) after ACL injury.
PURPOSE: To describe reasons that influenced patients' decisions for non-operative treatment or ACLR after ACL injury. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: This study recruited a total of 223 patients (50% men), aged 28 ± 8 years who had sustained ACL injury, either unilateral or bilateral. Subjects were, at different time points after injury, asked to fill out a questionnaire about their choice of treatment, where an ACLR treatment decision was made, some responded before and some after the ACLR treatment. A rating of the strength of 10 predetermined reasons in their choice of treatment graded as 0 (no reason) to 3 (very strong reason), was done.
RESULTS: Patients with unilateral ACL injury treated with ACLR (110 patients) rated "inability to perform physical activity at the same level as before the injury due to impaired knee function" (96%), "fear of increased symptoms during activity" (87%) and "giving way episodes" (83%) as strong or very strong reasons in their treatment decision. Patients with bilateral ACL injury treated with ACLR (109 knees) rated similar reasons as patients with unilateral ACLR and also "low confidence in the ability to perform at the preinjury activity level without ACLR" (80%) as strong or very strong reasons. Patients with unilateral ACL injury treated non-operatively (46 patients) rated "advice from clinician" (69%) as a strong or very strong reason. Patients with bilateral ACL injury treated non-operatively (25 knees) rated "absence of giving way episodes" (62%), and "no feeling of instability" (62%) as strong or very strong reasons.
CONCLUSION: Inability to perform physical activity, fear of increased symptoms, and giving way episodes were reasons that patients with ACL injury considered when making decisions about ACLR. When choosing non-operative treatment, patients considered the absence of instability or giving way symptoms, being able to perform physical activity, and advice from clinicians. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
© 2020 by the Sports Physical Therapy Section.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACL reconstruction; treatment decision

Year:  2020        PMID: 32566380      PMCID: PMC7297003     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  33 in total

1.  An epistemological shift: from evidence-based medicine to epistemological responsibility.

Authors:  Sophie van Baalen; Mieke Boon
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Who chooses anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and why? A 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  L R Swirtun; K Eriksson; P Renström
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 3.  Controversies in knee rehabilitation: anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Mathew J Failla; Amelia J H Arundale; David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 4.  Early Operative Versus Delayed or Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Kristina L Dunn; Kenneth C Lam; Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Patient-reported knee function, quality of life, and activity level after bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Anne Fältström; Martin Hägglund; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  Psychological Aspects of Recovery Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Melissa A Christino; Amanda J Fantry; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of meniscal lesions and isolated lesions of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in adults.

Authors:  P Beaufils; C Hulet; M Dhénain; R Nizard; G Nourissat; N Pujol
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 9.  Eight clinical conundrums relating to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in sport: recent evidence and a personal reflection.

Authors:  Per A Renström
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 10.  Clinical practice. Anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Treatment decision-making process after an anterior cruciate ligament injury: patients', orthopaedic surgeons' and physiotherapists' perspectives.

Authors:  Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts; Barbro Krevers; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.562

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.