Literature DB >> 25925241

Ancestries of a recombining diploid population.

R Sainudiin1, B Thatte2, A Véber3.   

Abstract

We derive the exact one-step transition probabilities of the number of lineages that are ancestral to a random sample from the current generation of a bi-parental population that is evolving under the discrete Wright-Fisher model with n diploid individuals. Our model allows for a per-generation recombination probability of r . When r = 1, our model is equivalent to Chang's (Adv Appl Probab 31:1002-1038, 1999) model for the karyotic pedigree. When r = 0, our model is equivalent to Kingman's (Stoch Process Appl 13:235-248, 1982) discrete coalescent model for the cytoplasmic tree or sub-karyotic tree containing a DNA locus that is free of intra-locus recombination. When 0 < r < 1 our model can be thought to track a sub-karyotic ancestral graph containing a DNA sequence from an autosomal chromosome that has an intra-locus recombination probability r . Thus, our family of models indexed by r ∈ [0, 1] connects Kingman's discrete coalescent to Chang's pedigree in a continuous way as r goes from 0 to 1. For large populations, we also study three properties of the ancestral process corresponding to a given r ∈ (0, 1): the time Tn to a most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the population, the time Un at which all individuals are either common ancestors of all present day individuals or ancestral to none of them, and the fraction of individuals that are common ancestors at time Un. These results generalize the three main results of Chang's (Adv Appl Probab 31:1002-1038, 1999). When we appropriately rescale time and recombination probability by the population size, our model leads to the continuous time Markov chain called the ancestral recombination graph of Hudson (Theor Popul Biol 23:183-201, 1983) and Griffiths (The two-locus ancestral graph, Institute of Mathematical Statistics 100-117, 1991).

Keywords:  Chang’s pedigree; Griffiths’ and Hudson’s ancestral recombination graphs; Kingman’s coalescent; Zygotic/karyotic/cytoplasmic/sub-karyotic ancestral graphs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25925241     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-015-0886-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  10 in total

1.  Gene genealogies within a fixed pedigree, and the robustness of Kingman's coalescent.

Authors:  John Wakeley; Léandra King; Bobbi S Low; Sohini Ramachandran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  To what extent does genealogical ancestry imply genetic ancestry?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Steven N Evans
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 4.  Revealing the hidden complexities of mtDNA inheritance.

Authors:  Daniel James White; Jonci Nikolai Wolff; Melanie Pierson; Neil John Gemmell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Three-parent in vitro fertilization: gene replacement for the prevention of inherited mitochondrial diseases.

Authors:  Paula Amato; Masahito Tachibana; Michelle Sparman; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  The relation between reproductive value and genetic contribution.

Authors:  Nicholas H Barton; Alison M Etheridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The existence and abundance of ghost ancestors in biparental populations.

Authors:  Simon Gravel; Mike Steel
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 8.  Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts.

Authors:  Gregory D D Hurst; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Inbreeding, pedigree size, and the most recent common ancestor of humanity.

Authors:  Joseph Lachance
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.691

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.