| Literature DB >> 25925007 |
Daniel Llywelyn Strachan1, Karin Källander2,3, Maureen Nakirunda4, Sozinho Ndima5, Abel Muiambo6, Zelee Hill7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly being used in low-income countries to address human resources shortages, yet there remain few effective, evidence-based strategies for addressing the enduring programmatic constraints of worker motivation, retention and performance. This paper describes how two interventions were designed by the Innovations at Scale for Community Access and Lasting Effects (inSCALE) project to address these constraints in Uganda and Mozambique drawing on behavioural theory and formative research results.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25925007 PMCID: PMC4426548 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-015-0020-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Resour Health ISSN: 1478-4491
Process of identification and development of interventions
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 1 | Identify interventions with the potential to improve the motivation, retention and performance of CHWs in Uganda and Mozambique by reviewing theoretical and empirical evidence, consulting with key stakeholders in the field and exploring the political and programmatic operating context |
| 2 | Conduct formative research with the key personnel targeted by and tasked with implementation of the proposed interventions to explore their feasibility and acceptability. Use the data generated to reduce the number of possible interventions |
| 3 | With the same personnel, explore the barriers and facilitators to CHW motivation, retention and performance and incorporate these lessons into intervention design |
| 4 | Design interventions to be implemented in Uganda and Mozambique and their implementation strategies drawing on theoretical and empirical evidence and the formative research data |
Respondent groups, methods and number and content of research encounters
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Uganda | IDIs (5), FGDs (3) | Ministry of Health personnel at national and district levels | Ranking of a long list of possible interventions and discussion of their acceptability and feasibility in context |
| Mozambique | IDIs (6), FGDs (4) | Ministry of Health personnel at national, district and provincial levels | |
| Uganda | IDIs (61) | CHWs (31), CHW supervisors (6), NGO and district personnel with experience in CHW programme implementation (6), local community leaders (6), caregivers of children below 5 years (6) and male heads of household (6) | CHW motivation and issues related to their retention, performance and interaction with their community |
| Mozambique | IDIs (26) | CHWs (12), supervisors (6), community leaders (4), district- and province-level personnel with experience in CHW programme implementation (4) | |
| Uganda | FGDs (15) | CHWs (7), supervisors (3), district personnel with experience in CHW programme implementation (2), local community leaders (1), caregivers of children below 5 years (1) and male heads of household (1) | Acceptability and feasibility of possible interventions |
| Mozambique | FGDs (4) | Mothers of children below 5 years (4) | |
Emphases from the theoretical review and formative research that support the key components of the community intervention
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Participatory village health club (VHC) facilitated by a CHW that is open to all, fun and focused on local health improvement | • Reinforcement and validation of CHW role value to CHWs through facilitation of the VHC and receiving community feedback | • CHWs want a greater sense of connectedness to their community. Community groups established to monitor and provide feedback to CHWs may improve motivation and performance by bringing CHWs closer to their community |
| • By directly seeing and receiving feedback on impact of their work, CHWs will more readily recognise the value of their work to the community and CHW collective | • Promoting the positive work that CHWs do in their community is reportedly motivating for CHWs and may engender greater community trust and standing/status of the CHWs | |
| • Working directly with community members as they identify, prioritise and find solutions to local health challenges will reinforce a sense of connectedness between CHWs and their community | • CHWs value community feedback | |
| • By operating in an interactive local forum, community expectations around what it is within the CHWs’ power to deliver can be explained and managed | • Locally meaningful activities are more likely to be sustained by the community with community groups highlighting the positive role played by CHWs, improving community esteem for CHWs | |
Emphases from the theoretical review and formative research that support the key components of the technology intervention
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
| Closed user groups | Potentially stimulate a feeling of shared experience and collective identity among CHWs. | Considered feasible and acceptable by Ministry of Health personnel | |
| Phone as a signifier of role—may increase the status and standing of CHWs in their community | |||
| Increase ease of communication with supervisors and promote a sense of connectedness to health system | |||
| Specifically, by promoting interaction with peers and supervisors, CHWs may: | Aid prompt CHW reporting of stock outs and other challenges | ||
| No need for CHWs to use own phone—cost saving plus potential to earn from solar charger | |||
| CHWs already meet informally so formalises an existing structure that is valued | |||
| • Gain a greater sense of the correspondence between CHW goals and those of the programme | Need for guidance on who initiates calls as CHWs can find unscheduled calls stressful | Concerns around supervisor workload led to recommendation that supervisors be available for contact at certain times only potentially leading to the provision of more efficient and targeted feedback through managing supervisor workload | |
| • Understand the value of achieving programme goals to the community and CHW collective | |||
| • Understand and normalise positive, appropriate and distinguishing actions of ‘good’ CHWs | |||
| CHW electronic data submission and feedback and targeted supervision | Through targeted feedback delivered by supervisors: | Feeling valued and linked to the health system | |
| Feeling encouraged by positive local gains/improved community health and their role | |||
| • Gain a greater sense of the correspondence between own goals and those of the programme • Understand and normalise positive, appropriate and distinguishing actions of good CHWs • Promote realistic actions of CHWs that are within their power to deliver | Strong desire among CHWs for feedback and more supervision—targeted supervision welcome | ||
| Concerns about supervisor speed of responsiveness—needs to be sufficiently prompt to avoid CHW discouragement | Tone of messages key with need for polite and respectful language emphasised in order to be motivating with no admonishments for poor performance | ||
| Monthly motivational SMS | Through contextually appropriate and regular messages: | Positive, encouraging, polite and respectful tone with emphasis on the value CHWs bring to their community | |
| Important to feel valued, supported and linked to the health system | |||
| • Promote the correspondence between CHW goals and those of the programme | Receiving messages that are locally relevant and address key challenges promotes a sense of CHW relevance and importance to the health system | ||
| If the message resonates with data submitted, then will be perceived as performance-related feedback which was considered motivating by CHWs | |||
| • Promote the shared experience of CHWs | |||
| • Promote the value of achieving programme goals to the CHW collective | |||
| • Validate and normalise positive, appropriate and distinguishing actions of ‘good’ CHWs | |||
| • Promote realistic actions of CHWs that are within their power to deliver | |||
Figure 1A social identity model of work motivation and performance (van Knippenberg, 2000) [48]. © International Association for Applied Psychology, 2000d.