Literature DB >> 25924123

The impact of adopting EHRs: how losing connectivity affects clinical reasoning.

Lara Varpio1, Kathy Day, Pat Elliot-Miller, James W King, Craig Kuziemsky, Avi Parush, Tyson Roffey, Judy Rashotte.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: As electronic health records (EHRs) are adopted by teaching hospitals, educators must examine how this change impacts trainee development.
OBJECTIVES: We investigate this influence by studying clinician experiences of a hospital's move from paper charts to an EHR. We ask: how does each chart modality present conceptions of time and data interconnections? How do these conceptions affect clinical reasoning?
METHODS: This two-phase, longitudinal study employed constructivist grounded theory. Data were collected at a paediatric teaching hospital before (Phase 1), during and after (Phase 2) the transition from a paper chart to an EHR system. Data collection consisted of field observations (146 hours involving 300 health care providers, 22 patients and 32 patient family members), think-aloud (n = 13) and think-after (n = 11) sessions, interviews (n = 39) and document retrieval (n = 392). Theories of rhetorical genre studies and visual rhetoric informed analysis.
RESULTS: In the paper flowsheet, clinicians recorded and viewed patient data in chronologically organised displays that emphasised data interconnections. In the EHR flowsheet, clinicians viewed and recorded individual data points that were largely chronologically and contextually isolated. Clinicians reported that this change resulted in: (i) not knowing the patient's evolving status; (ii) increased cognitive workload, and (iii) loss of clinical reasoning support mechanisms.
CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how patient data are interconnected is essential to clinical reasoning. The use of EHRs supports this goal because the EHR is a tool for collecting dispersed data; however, these collections often deconstruct data interconnections. Where the paper flowsheet emphasises chronology and interconnectedness, the EHR flowsheet emphasises individual data values that are largely independent of time and other patient data. To prepare trainees to work with EHRs, the ways of thinking and acting that were implicitly learned through the use of paper charts must be made explicit. To support clinical reasoning, medical educators should provide lessons in connectivity – the chronologically framed data interconnections upon which clinicians rely to provide patient care.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25924123     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  9 in total

Review 1.  A Survey of the Literature on Unintended Consequences Associated with Health Information Technology: 2014-2015.

Authors:  K Zheng; J Abraham; L L Novak; T L Reynolds; A Gettinger
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

2.  The Electronic Medical Record and Nephrology Fellowship Education in the United States: An Opinion Survey.

Authors:  Christina M Yuan; Dustin J Little; Eric S Marks; Maura A Watson; Rajeev Raghavan; Robert Nee
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Diagnostic Reasoning of Resident Physicians in the Age of Clinical Pathways.

Authors:  Morgan Congdon; Caitlin B Clancy; Dorene F Balmer; Hannah Anderson; Naveen Muthu; Christopher P Bonafide; Irit R Rasooly
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

4.  Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Automated Assessment of Resident Clinical Reasoning Documentation.

Authors:  Verity Schaye; Benedict Guzman; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Marina Marin; Ilan Reinstein; David Kudlowitz; Louis Miller; Jonathan Chun; Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Development of a Clinical Reasoning Documentation Assessment Tool for Resident and Fellow Admission Notes: a Shared Mental Model for Feedback.

Authors:  Verity Schaye; Louis Miller; David Kudlowitz; Jonathan Chun; Jesse Burk-Rafel; Patrick Cocks; Benedict Guzman; Yindalon Aphinyanaphongs; Marina Marin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  The Value of Electronic Health Records Since the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shikha Modi; Sue S Feldman
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-09-27

7.  Digital Care in Epilepsy: A Conceptual Framework for Technological Therapies.

Authors:  Rupert Page; Rohit Shankar; Brendan N McLean; Jane Hanna; Craig Newman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  The impact of computerised physician order entry and clinical decision support on pharmacist-physician communication in the hospital setting: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah K Pontefract; Jamie J Coleman; Hannah K Vallance; Christine A Hirsch; Sonal Shah; John F Marriott; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using electronic patient records: defining learning outcomes for undergraduate education.

Authors:  S K Pontefract; K Wilson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.