David J Greenblatt1, Jerold S Harmatz1. 1. From the Program in Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Tufts University School of Medicine and Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: The regulatory prohibition of ketoconazole as a CYP3A index inhibitor in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies has compelled consideration of alternative inhibitors. METHODS: The biomedical literature was searched to identify DDI studies in which oral midazolam (MDZ) was the victim, and the inhibitory perpetrator was either ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin, or ritonavir. The ratios (RAUC ) of total area under the curve (AUC) for MDZ with inhibitor divided by MDZ AUC in the control condition were aggregated across individual studies for each inhibitor. RESULTS: Mean (± SE) RAUC values were: ketoconazole (15 studies, 131 subjects), 11.5 (±1.2); itraconazole (five studies, 48 subjects), 7.3 (±1.0); clarithromycin (five studies, 73 subjects), 6.5 (±10.9); and ritonavir (13 studies, 159 subjects), 14.5 (±2.0). Differences among inhibitors were significant (F = 5.31, P < 0.005). RAUC values were not significantly related to inhibitor dosage or to duration of inhibitor pre-exposure prior to administration of MDZ. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir produces CYP3A inhibition equivalent to or greater than ketoconazole, and is the best index CYP3A inhibitor alternative to ketoconazole. Cobicistat closely resembles ritonavir in structure and function, and can also be considered. Itraconazole and clarithromycin are not suitable alternatives since they do not produce inhibition comparable with ketoconazole or ritonavir, and have other significant disadvantages as well.
AIMS: The regulatory prohibition of ketoconazole as a CYP3A index inhibitor in drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies has compelled consideration of alternative inhibitors. METHODS: The biomedical literature was searched to identify DDI studies in which oral midazolam (MDZ) was the victim, and the inhibitory perpetrator was either ketoconazole, itraconazole, clarithromycin, or ritonavir. The ratios (RAUC ) of total area under the curve (AUC) for MDZ with inhibitor divided by MDZ AUC in the control condition were aggregated across individual studies for each inhibitor. RESULTS: Mean (± SE) RAUC values were: ketoconazole (15 studies, 131 subjects), 11.5 (±1.2); itraconazole (five studies, 48 subjects), 7.3 (±1.0); clarithromycin (five studies, 73 subjects), 6.5 (±10.9); and ritonavir (13 studies, 159 subjects), 14.5 (±2.0). Differences among inhibitors were significant (F = 5.31, P < 0.005). RAUC values were not significantly related to inhibitor dosage or to duration of inhibitor pre-exposure prior to administration of MDZ. CONCLUSIONS:Ritonavir produces CYP3A inhibition equivalent to or greater than ketoconazole, and is the best index CYP3A inhibitor alternative to ketoconazole. Cobicistat closely resembles ritonavir in structure and function, and can also be considered. Itraconazole and clarithromycin are not suitable alternatives since they do not produce inhibition comparable with ketoconazole or ritonavir, and have other significant disadvantages as well.
Authors: J A Barone; J G Koh; R H Bierman; J L Colaizzi; K A Swanson; M C Gaffar; B L Moskovitz; W Mechlinski; V Van de Velde Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Siamak Cyrus Khojasteh; Saileta Prabhu; Jane R Kenny; Jason S Halladay; Anthony Y H Lu Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: I E Templeton; K E Thummel; E D Kharasch; K L Kunze; C Hoffer; W L Nelson; N Isoherranen Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Jang-Ik Lee; Diego Chaves-Gnecco; Janet A Amico; Patricia D Kroboth; John W Wilson; Reginald F Frye Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Kerry E Culm-Merdek; Lisa L von Moltke; Lu Gan; Kelly A Horan; Robyn Reynolds; Jerold S Harmatz; Michael H Court; David J Greenblatt Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Ping Zhao; Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi; Lei Zhang; John M Strong; Kellie S Reynolds; Rene H Levy; Kenneth E Thummel; Shiew-Mei Huang Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Herbert Wiesinger; Matthias Berse; Stefan Klein; Simone Gschwend; Joachim Höchel; Frank S Zollmann; Barbara Schütt Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Gerd Mikus; Kathrin I Foerster; Theresa Terstegen; Cathrin Vogt; André Said; Martin Schulz; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 8.251
Authors: Maiko Nomoto; Cynthia A Zamora; Edgar Schuck; Peter Boyd; Min-Kun Chang; Jagadeesh Aluri; Y Amy Siu; W George Lai; Sanae Yasuda; Jim Ferry; Bhaskar Rege Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Robert Townsend; Albert Dietz; Christine Hale; Shahzad Akhtar; Donna Kowalski; Christopher Lademacher; Kenneth Lasseter; Helene Pearlman; Diane Rammelsberg; Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann; Takao Yamazaki; Amit Desai Journal: Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Date: 2016-07-25
Authors: Takao Yamazaki; Amit Desai; David Han; Kota Kato; Donna Kowalski; Shahzad Akhtar; Christopher Lademacher; Laura Kovanda; Robert Townsend Journal: Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Date: 2016-07-20