| Literature DB >> 25923217 |
G Reynolds1, J R Gibbon1, A G Pratt1, M J Wood1, D Coady2, G Raftery2, A R Lorenzi3, A Gray3, A Filer4, C D Buckley4, M A Haniffa5, J D Isaacs1, C M U Hilkens1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A population of synovial inflammatory dendritic cells (infDCs) has recently been identified in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and is thought to be monocyte-derived. Here, we investigated the role and source of granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the differentiation of synovial infDC in RA.Entities:
Keywords: Autoimmunity; Cytokines; Inflammation; Rheumatoid Arthritis; T Cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25923217 PMCID: PMC4853576 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206578
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Rheum Dis ISSN: 0003-4967 Impact factor: 19.103
Figure 1CD4+ T cells are the main source of granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are primed to produce it. (A) RA synovial fluid (SF) mononuclear cell (MC) fractions (whole SFMC, SF CD4+ T cells and SFMC depleted of CD4+ T cells; 106 cells/mL) were left unstimulated or were stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; 10 ng/mL) and ionomycin (1 μg/mL) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 ng/mL) for 12 h. GM-CSF levels in supernatants were determined by ELISA. Data are represented as mean±SEM of six independent donors. Results below the limit of detection of the ELISA (4.7 pg/mL) are indicated by ‘
Figure 2Human CD4+ T cells optimally produce granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) under high stimulus Th1 conditions. (A) Peripheral blood (PB) CD4+ T cells (5×105 cells/mL) from healthy donors were stimulated with anti-CD2/CD3/CD28-coated beads without or with Th17 polarising cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1β, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and IL-23, all at 20 ng/mL) at a ratio of 1:10 beads:T cells for six days before being rested in IL-2 (10 U/mL) for a further 4 days. Cytokine production was analysed by flow cytometry. Results of four independent experiments are shown. Statistical analysis was performed by a paired two-tailed t test. (B) PB CD4+ T cells (5×105 cells/mL) from healthy donors were stimulated with anti-CD2/CD3/CD28-coated beads at indicated ratios of cells to beads for six days before being rested in IL-2 (10 U/mL) for a further 4 days. Cytokine production was analysed by flow cytometry. Results of four independent experiments are shown. Statistical analysis was performed by a paired two-tailed t test. (C and D) Naïve healthy donor PB CD4+ T cells (5×105 cells/mL) were stimulated with anti-CD2/CD3/CD28-coated beads in the presence of the indicated cytokines (all at a concentration of 20 ng/mL, added day 0 and refreshed on day 3) and on day 6 the cells were rested in IL-2 (10 U/mL) for a further 4 days before analysis of cytokine production by intracellular flow cytometry. Representative flow data are shown in (C) and data of seven independent donors per group are presented in (D) with the results analysed by one-way followed by post hoc analysis by Tukey's multiple comparison testing. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 or ***p<0.001.
Figure 3Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial CD4+ T cells promote CD14+ monocytes to differentiate into a CD1c+ population and this effect in granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) dependent. (A) CD4+ T cells were isolated from healthy donor peripheral blood (PB), non-RA inflammatory arthritis and RA synovial fluid (SF) and cultured together with allogeneic healthy donor CD14+ monocytes in a 24-well plate at a ratio of 1:2 monocytes:T cells (5×105 monocytes:106 T cells/mL) for 3 days. Cells were harvested and cell surface marker expression was analysed by flow cytometry using the gating strategy indicated (top) with representative examples of flow data (bottom). The proportion of CD16−CD1c+ cells within the CD2−CD11c+ fraction induced by different CD4+ T-cell donors was analysed. Results from four to seven donors per group are summarised in (B) with horizontal bars representing mean values. Data were analysed by ANOVA before post hoc analysis by Tukey's multiple comparison testing. (C) SF T cells were cocultured with allogeneic monocytes as above in the presence of a neutralising antibody to GM-CSF at 10 μg/mL. Representative results from two independent repeats are shown. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 or ***p<0.001.
Figure 4The CD1c+ population induced by rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid (SF) T cells have phenotypic and functional properties of dendritic cells. (A) CD16+CD1c− (‘CD16’) and CD16−CD1c+ (‘CD1c’) fractions were flow-sorted from 3-day cocultures of CD14+ monocytes and allogeneic SF CD4+ T cells and phenotype assessed by phase-contrast microscopy of cytospin slides. (B) The same flow-sorted fractions were placed in an allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR; 104 antigen presenting cells/well) in a 96-well plate with CD4+ T cells at a 1:10 ratio for 6 days. T-cell proliferation was analysed at this point by 3H-thymidine incorporation assay. Results are shown as mean±SEM of four independent donors (CPM = counts per minute). Data were analysed by a two-tailed t test. (C) CD4+ T cells from the same MLRs were harvested on day 6, counted to provide an absolute number and cytokine production analysed following restimulation with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate/ionomycin (106 cells/mL) by intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry. The percentage cytokine positive cells (top, n=5, top, horizontal lines represent mean values) and the absolute number of cytokine producing cells (bottom, n=4, results shown as mean±SEM) are shown. Analysis was performed by paired two-tailed t test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 or ***p<0.001. IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin.
Figure 5Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) synovial fluid (SF) is enriched for a population of CD1c+ cells within the macrophage/dendritic cell fraction. (A–C) Single cell suspensions were obtained from digested synovial tissue and compared with SF and blood using the strategy indicated in (A) to compare the proportions of CD16+CD1c− and CD16−CD1c+ cells within the lin−HLA-DR+CD11c+ fraction. Representative examples shown in (B) and a summary of two to six donors for each condition summarised in (C). Horizontal lines represent mean values. Groups were analysed by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis was performed using Tukey's multiple comparison test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 or ***p<0.001.